Talk:Ancient Australia

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Macdonald-ross in topic Explaining a change

Explaining a change change

I will take out the reference to 70K years ago because the sources are not appropriate for such a claim. One individual member of a team made the claim, and not in a refereed source. That is not proper scientific practice. The 50K year claim is well sourced, and should stay. Another source is a dead link. We need to be careful not to present speculation as fact. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:38, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Return to "Ancient Australia" page.