Talk:Aurornis
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Macdonald-ross in topic About the science
About the science change
As originally put up, this article gave the false impression that the issue of the fossil's provenance was settled. It is not. It was bought from a dealer, who had a vested interest in claiming it came from the earlier site. It is quite wrong of an editor to leave out this fact and to present the doubted source as a certain fact. In the introduction, the editor changed the word "dinosaur" to "bird", which increased the deception. That is why I have brought over much more from the English wiki article than is normal. It is essential that we do not present science in a dishonest way. If something's doubtful, then it's doubtful. Macdonald-ross (talk) 16:24, 15 October 2013 (UTC)