Wikipedia:Editor review/Razorflame 7

Razorflame (talk · contribs) Hello there all. This is my seventh editor review, and I definitely feel like I could use another one since my last editor review was back in January of this year. Basically, I will make this a short request: Please tell me what I do right and what I do wrong in a constructive way so that I can modify these behaviors to make me a better editor here on the Simple English Wikipedia. Since coming back from my extended Wikibreak, I feel that I have come back a changed editor, as is evidenced by my recent acceptance of the deletion of a good 80% of the article work that I have done here on the Simple English Wikipedia. Those two RfDs have changed my perspective of things here on the Simple English Wikipedia, and I definitely believe that it is a positive change for the better. Please let me know how I am doing :). Thanks!Razorflame 22:46, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    The edits that I am most particularly pleased with are my huge expansions of the articles Romania and Wisconsin, and the promotion of Romania from a PGA to a GA to a PVGA to a VGA, which I never thought I would be able to do ever. I also am pleased with my earlier GA, Lenzburg. Furthermore, I am particularly pleased with my attitude towards the deletion of nearly 80% of the articles that I have written for the Simple English Wikipedia.
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    There have been many situations that have caused me stress in the past, but I have overcome them all with strategicly placed wikibreaks and I believe that my actions done during these times were the right ones at this time.