Attribute-value system

knowledge representation comprising a table with columns designating "attributes" and rows designating "objects", such that each cell designates the value (or "state") of a particular attribute of a particular object

An attribute-value system is a basic knowledge representation framework comprising a table with columns designating "attributes" (also known as "properties", "predicates," "features," "dimensions," "characteristics" or "independent variables" depending on the context) and rows designating "objects" (also known as "entities," "instances," "exemplars," "elements" or "dependent variables."). Each table cell therefore designates the value (also known as "state") of a particular attribute of a particular object.

Example of attribute-value system Edit

Below is a sample attribute-value system. It represents 10 objects (rows) and five features (columns). In this example, the table contains only integer values. In general, an attribute-value system may contain any kind of data, numeric or otherwise. An attribute-value system is distinguished from a simple "feature list" representation in that each feature in an attribute-value system may possess a range of values (e.g., feature   below, which has domain of {0,1,2}), rather than simply being present or absent (Barsalou & Hale 1993)

Sample Attribute-Value System
  1 2 0 1 1
  1 2 0 1 1
  2 0 0 1 0
  0 0 1 2 1
  2 1 0 2 1
  0 0 1 2 2
  2 0 0 1 0
  0 1 2 2 1
  2 1 0 2 2
  2 0 0 1 0

Other terms used for "attribute-value system" Edit

Attribute-value systems are pervasive throughout many different literatures, and have been discussed under many different names:

  • Flat data
  • Spreadsheet
  • Attribute-value system (Ziarko & Shan 1996)
  • Information system (Pawlak 1981)
  • Classification system (Ziarko 1998)
  • Knowledge representation system (Wong & Ziarko 1986)
  • Information table (Yao & Yao 2002)
  • Object-predicate table (Watanabe 1985)
  • Aristotelian table (Watanabe 1985)
  • Simple frames (Barsalou & Hale 1993)
  • First normal form database

Related pages Edit

References Edit

  • Barsalou, Lawrence W. & Christopher R. Hale (1993), "Components of conceptual representation: From feature lists to recursive frames", in Iven Van Mechelen, James Hampton, Ryszard S. Michalski, & Peter Theuns, Categories and Concepts: Theoretical Views and Inductive Data Analysis, London: Academic Press
  • Pawlak, Zdzisław (1991). Rough sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Wong, S.K.M.; Ziarko, Wojciech; Ye, R.Li (1986). "Comparison of rough-set and statistical methods in inductive learning". International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 24: 53–72. doi:10.1016/S0020-7373(86)80033-5.
  • J. T., Yao (2002). "Induction of classification rules by granular computing". Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing (TSCTC'02). London, UK: Springer-Verlag. pp. 331–338. {{cite conference}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  • Watanabe, Satosi (1985). Pattern Recognition: Human and Mechanical. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Ziarko, Wojciech (1998). "Rough sets as a methodology for data mining". In Polkowski, Lech and Skowron, Andrzej (ed.). Rough Sets in Knowledge Discovery 1: Methodology and Applications. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag. pp. 554–576.{{cite conference}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link)