In psychology and the cognitive sciences, perception is the process of taking in, picking, organizing, and understanding sensory information. It includes collecting data from sense organs and interpreting it in the brain. Consider this: Light enters our eyes, and the brain works on this information to build up a mental picture of what is going on "out there". Perception is a lot more than just "information coming in". It is an active process.
There are many ways to study perception. There are biological or physiological approaches, psychological approaches through the philosophy of mind and experiments. There are studies by philosophers such as David Hume, John Locke, George Berkeley.
History of the study of perceptionEdit
The study of perception started with the study of sight. This makes sense because humans understand the world largely by looking at it.
The first studies of perception happened in the years 460-371 BC by the Greek philosopher Democritus. He believed the shapes we see were pictures which flew to our eyes, where our soul would then recognize them. The philosopher Plato (427- 348 BC) later came up with a new idea, he believed the eyes worked by first making light and then scanning the world. Another Greek philosopher and student of Plato called Aristotle (384 to 322 BC) did not agree with these ideas. He presented a new theory :
- Light can only come from bright objects, like fire and the sun.
- Light is not something you can touch
- Light hits objects and then bounces off the object to hit our eyes
- Light moves through something that humans can't see
Aristotle's ideas were accepted for hundreds of years to follow.
10th & 11th CenturyEdit
Kepler explained what is inside of the eye. Descartes said that the way our physical senses see the world does not affect how we think about the world. Locke and Descartes both thought humans saw color because of the senses.
Kant suggested that humans can't know about things which our senses don’t see. Because of this he stated that a god and a soul were not possible.
New techniques were created and used to study the brain and perception. Many of these studies were paired with data on human behavior. The psychologist Wundt stated that perception could not just be explained by the way the body works and that psychology was needed too.
Process of PerceptionEdit
Bruner's model of perceptionEdit
- When we see someone we don't know, we are looking for signs which will tell us things about them.
- As we pick up on some signs, we match this person to a group we have seen before.
- The search for signs that tell us about who they are becomes less broad.
- We now only search for signs that put this person into the group we have matched them to. 
Saks and Johns model of perceptionEdit
- The perceiver : This is the person doing the observing and perceiving. There are three things that can have an effect on someone's perception. These are : How much experience someone has, how motivated this person is, and how they are feeling. Also, in some situations someone can use a "perceptual defense", this is when they only see what they want to see.
- The person who is being watched and perceived : The least the other person knows about them the more they will try to guess.
- The time and place this situation is happening at : This affects the amount of attention the perceiver gives to a situation. 
Types of perceptionEdit
Touch is what you feel with your skin. The skin's top layer has receptors that take information in when touched. These receptors can sense pain, how hot or cold something is and how heavy something is. Receptors then send this information to our nervous system. 
Taste is the flavor of things we eat or drink. Our tongue has many little bumps which take in our food's flavor. These bumps then send a message to our brain for us to taste.
Theories of PerceptionEdit
Theories of perception can be sorted into two groups. The first group believes in Bottom-Up processing. This approach means that to perceive, humans only needs information from their senses. For example : light enters the eye, this light is sent to the brain and the brain turns it into something we see.
The second group is Top-Down processing. In this approach, perception starts off with something general and becomes specific. What we already know or expect has a big effect here. For example : if you see half of a cat, you will have an idea of what it looks like even though half of it is hidden. This is because you have seen a cat before. Top down processing helps humans quickly make sense of their environment without having to think too much.
Gibson's Ecological TheoryEdit
James Gibson (1904-1979) states that perception happens because of our human instincts. This means it can't be learned. He suggests that perception is needed for humans to stay alive. Neanderthals would have needed perception to escape danger, suggesting perception is the result of evolution. Gibson's theory is known as the "Ecological Theory" , because he says that perception can only be explained by our environment. To Gibson, Sensation = perception. 
Stephen E. PalmerEdit
Palmer states that people have ideas about how the world looks like, and they use that knowledge to figure out what things are. He did a study in 1975 to show this. In his study, people were shown groups of 4 pictures. One picture was a location, a kitchen for example. The other three pictures were one object you would find in a kitchen (bread) , and two pictures that had no ties to the kitchen (an instrument and a mailbox). This was repeated with many different places and objects. His findings showed that people found it harder to recognize the objects that had no relationship to the location. 
References and more readingEdit
Find more about
at Wikipedia's sister projects
|Definitions from Wiktionary|
|Media from Commons|
|News stories from Wikinews|
|Quotations from Wikiquote|
|Source texts from Wikisource|
|Textbooks from Wikibooks|
|Learning resources from Wikiversity|
- The word perception comes from the Latin perception-, percepio and means "receiving, collecting, action of taking possession, apprehension with the mind or senses."—OED.com.
- Simm (2016). "Der Sehsinn – Ein kleines Wunder von Auge bisCortexhes Wunder". www.dasgehirn.info. Retrieved 2021-02-17.
- Kramer (2016). "Sehen: Philosophie und Wissenschaftsgeschichte". www.dasgehirn.info. Retrieved 2021-02-17.
- Smelser, N.J (2001). International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences. Amsterdam: Pergamon. pp. 11202–11205.
- "Bruner's Model of the Perceptual Process Bruner Model of the Perceptual Process". StuDocu. Retrieved 2021-02-17.
- Morrow (2013). "What is our Perception?". Retrieved 2021-02-17.
- "How the Eyes Work | National Eye Institute". www.nei.nih.gov. Retrieved 2021-02-17.
- "How Do We Hear?". NIDCD. 2015-08-18. Retrieved 2021-02-17.
- McGurrin, Patrick (2016-03-31). "How Do We Sense Touch?". askabiologist.asu.edu. Retrieved 2021-02-17.
- Information, National Center for Biotechnology; Pike, U. S. National Library of Medicine 8600 Rockville; MD, Bethesda; Usa, 20894 (2016-08-17). How does our sense of taste work?. Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG).CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
- "Smell Disorders". NIDCD. 2015-08-18. Retrieved 2021-02-17.
- Démuth (2013). "(PDF) Perception Theories". ResearchGate. Retrieved 2021-02-17.
- Palmer, Stephen E. (1975). "(PDF) The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects". ResearchGate. Retrieved 2021-02-17.
- Arnheim R. 1969. Visual thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-24226-5.
- Flanagan J.R., Lederman S.J. 2001.Neurobiology: Feeling bumps and holes, News and Views, Nature, 412(6845):389–91.
- Gregory R.L. 1966. Eye and Brain: the psychology of seeing. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson; 5th edition 1997, Oxford University Press/Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-04837-1
- Gregory R.L. 1981. Mind in Science: a history of explanations of psychology and physics. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson; USA: CUP. Paperback, Peregrine.
- Popper A.N. & Platt C. 1993. Inner ear and lateral line of bony fishes. In Evans D.H. The Physiology of Fishes. CRC Press. pp. 99–136. ISBN 978-0-8493-8042-6
- Robles-De-La-Torre, G. The importance of the sense of touch in virtual and real environments Archived 2014-01-24 at the Wayback Machine. IEEE Multimedia 13(3), Special issue on Haptic User Interfaces for Multimedia Systems, pp. 24–30 (2006).
- Online papers on perception Archived 2007-03-19 at the Wayback Machine, by various authors, compiled by David Chalmers
- Paradoxical haptic objects Archived 2016-03-03 at the Wayback Machine. An example of touch illusions of shape. See also the MIT Technology Review article:
- The Cutting Edge of Haptics, by Duncan Graham-Rowe.
- Theories of Perception Archived 2006-12-23 at the Wayback Machine