Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. This is vandalism which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to you being blocked from changing Wikipedia. If you would like to try out changing Wikipedia again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Barras (talk) 11:40, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Quick deletion of YabasicEdit

The page you wrote, Yabasic, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was a page that had little or no meaning. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Ruy Pugliesi 14:04, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Gran Turismo 5Edit

An editor has requested deletion of Gran Turismo 5, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2011/Gran Turismo 5 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much.

RfD nomination of Ferrari F50Edit

An editor has requested deletion of Ferrari F50, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2011/Ferrari F50 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much.

Redirecting to the English WikipediaEdit

Hi. I saw you redirected some articles to the version in the English Wikipedia. Since redirecting to a different Wikipedia is not allowed, I have deleted the articles. If an article does not exist, you can create it (based on its English Wikipedia counterpart) here. If it's based on the English Wikipedia, please see WP:CFW. Thanks. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 17:16, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Quick deletion of Gran Turismo 5Edit

The page you wrote, Gran Turismo 5, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was copied from another Wikipedia. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Auntof6 (talk) 20:59, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Quick deletion of Sim racingEdit

The page you wrote, Sim racing, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was a page that had no content. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Auntof6 (talk) 15:45, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Quick deletion of Game RankingsEdit

The page you wrote, Game Rankings, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was a page that had no content. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Auntof6 (talk) 15:54, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Quick deletion of World Rally ChampionshipEdit

The page you wrote, World Rally Championship, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was a page that had no content. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Auntof6 (talk) 15:56, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Quick deletion of Polyphony DigitalEdit

The page you wrote, Polyphony Digital, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was a page that had little or no meaning. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Auntof6 (talk) 15:56, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Quick deletion of Kazunori YamauchiEdit

The page you wrote, Kazunori Yamauchi, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was a page that had little or no meaning. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Auntof6 (talk) 15:57, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Quick deletion of Rev limiterEdit

The page you wrote, Rev limiter, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was a page that had little or no meaning. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Auntof6 (talk) 15:57, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Quick deletion of Red or blackEdit

The page you wrote, Red or black, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was a page that had little or no meaning. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Auntof6 (talk) 15:58, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

helpmeEdit

{{helpme|Why do my pages get removed in spite of the {{wait}} templates? HELPME!!!!!}}

There were different issues with different articles. Some of the issues were:

  • Some of the pages were just links to the English Wikipedia. This is not allowed. Pages here on Simple English Wikipedia should be separate articles, not references to someplace else.
  • At least one of the articles had been copied directly from English Wikipedia. This is one of the specific things that can get a page here quickly deleted. Pages here should be in Simple English -- most pages on English Wikipedia are too complex to be copied here directly.
  • Other pages had sentence fragments that weren't informative or weren't proper encyclopedia articles. Even "stub" articles should be in complete sentences and have some meaningful information.

If you want to continue creating articles here, I suggest that you create one on a subpage of your user page and have someone review it before you put it in the regular article area. If you continue to create a lot of articles with the issues above, you might lose your ability to edit here at all. --Auntof6 (talk) 17:45, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

September 2011Edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you made may not meet our rules for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about changing. Thank you. DJSasso (talk) 19:09, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

  This is the last warning you will get for making changes, such as the one you made to "Feces", to Wikipedia articles that make no sense or have wrong information. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from changing Wikipedia. --GoblinBot4 (talk) 10:42, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

HelpEdit

{{helpme}} Why does GoblinBo undo my edits and say it's vandalism? HELP!

Probably because you are vandalizing. You need to STOP, look at the policies here and ask yourself "What rules have I broken?". If you do that you will realize you have broken quite a few and need to calm down and think before you edit! If an edit is undone ask yourself why it was undone and rectify the cause before doing the same edit again! Barts1a (talk) 11:19, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

{{helpme}} What does wikify mean?

The following is from Wikipedia:Glossary:
Wikify
To format using Wiki markup (as opposed to plain text or HTML) and add internal links to material, incorporating it into the whole of Wikipedia. Noun: Wikification. See Category:Articles that need to be wikified
  — Jeff G. ツ 13:29, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Quick deletion of Gran Turismo 5Edit

The page you wrote, Gran Turismo 5, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was a copy of a page that was deleted by RfD. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Auntof6 (talk) 09:14, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

RfDEdit

I have a feeling you are posting several times in RfD's such as this one to make it look like you are several different people and therefore more than one vote. Please keep comments to one posting. We can tell you are the same person so do not do it again please. Normandy (talk) 12:41, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

  • Also, can I suggest registering and logging in? Things go so much easier if you have a login. Its not required (obviously) but it may help. Normandy (talk) 12:54, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

STOP adding unncessary comments on RfD. The RfD will be open until the closing date or unless an admin closes it. You do not need to advertise it everywhere and keep asking the same question and keep making your point. You've said you think IE is a copy-paste from en. While I agree with you we need to wait until other people have their say. I've told you about this more than once. Consider this a warning. Normandy (talk) 13:15, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Also, please remember to include all your RfD requests like you did here. If you forget one no-one will know you've nominated it for deletion. Normandy (talk) 13:21, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Enough with the RfD. Gotanda (talk) 13:24, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Quick deletion of Mind readingEdit

The page you wrote, Mind reading, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was a page that had little or no meaning. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Auntof6 (talk) 13:37, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make useful changes to Wikipedia. However, at least one of your changes, such as the one you made to "Gran Turismo 5", did not appear to be useful and has been automatically reverted by GoblinBot4. If you want to try out changing Wikipedia to learn more about how it works, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Bad warning? Please report it here then remove this warning. --GoblinBot4 (talk) 13:38, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | unblock | changes) asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason.

Request reason: "You provided no reason. Why am I bocked?"

Decline reason: "For being purposefully disruptive. You are lucky it is for only as short a time as it is. I would have blocked longer. -- DJSasso (talk) 15:16, 12 September 2011 (UTC)"

September 2011Edit

I would strongly encourage you to create a signon. It will facilitate communication with you. Also, when you leave a message, please type ~~~~ after it so that people can easily see who wrote the message. If you have a signon you can create user subpages where you can develop articles before moving them into the encyclopeida. Best wishes, Racepacket (talk) 15:39, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Quick deletion of Gran Turismo 2Edit

The page you wrote, Gran Turismo 2, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was copied from another Wikipedia. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Auntof6 (talk) 21:26, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

UnblockEdit

This blocked user (block log | unblock | changes) asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason.

Request reason: "What did I do wrong, that warrants a block? I did simplify Gran Turismo 2, and I did it the best I can. How can I improve on it? I'm not doing anything wrong? What did I do wrong? It just says no reason given. I'm here to help Wikipedia, and will do no harm."

Decline reason: "Looks like the block expired already. -- Barras (talk) 09:17, 16 September 2011 (UTC)"

What's the point of unblock, if by the time someone gets here, the block expired?--213.107.74.132 (talk) 09:19, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
If we'd declined it, it would've been the same. No one bothers to do this when not needed. -Barras (talk) 09:21, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

{{helpme|Why can't I get the unblock to work?}}

Some commentsEdit

You seem to be trying to be a good contributor here, so I have some comments for you.

  1. First, thank you for signing your posts. That is very helpful. :)
  2. When you nominate a page for deletion, as you did with Www.gaganjatt.com, you don't need to use both the quick delete and request for deletion processes. Also, when using quick delete, you only need to specify one reason, not every reason that applies.
  3. On some of the articles you created, you used an edit summary like "Note: This is a stub. Do not QD it, it's just the start, and will expand over time." Articles do not get deleted because they are stubs. There is a difference between a stub article and an article that fits quick delete A1 (little or no meaning) or A2 (no content). Besides that, asking people not to QD an article will not prevent someone from QDing it.
  4. On a similar note, you put a note on Talk:Gran Turismo 4 saying "This is a stub. Anyone want to expand it?". You created that article. If you aren't interested enough to expand it, why would someone else be?

I think that's enough for now. Keep up the good work! --Auntof6 (talk) 21:29, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

The reason why I put "Note: This is a stub. Do not QD it, it's just the start, and will expand over time." is because some-one may QD it because it's small or has little meaning, but if they wait, it will becoe bigger. This has happend to me before with pages like Gran Turismo 5, Rev limiter and Red or black where I create small stubs, and people don't give me chance to make it bigger and better, and just QD it and there it goes in a blink of an eye. As for the last note, is Wikipedia not a community project? Everyone works together.--213.107.74.132 (talk) 07:19, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

PlayStation VitaEdit

Hi there, I have a suggestion for you. Instead of creating very short articles, why not just look at its English Wikipedia page and use that information, but just make it simple English. Please DO NOT copy and paste it though... --Orashmatash 12:23, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

YabasicEdit

Hey there. Just wanted to let you know that if you want to move a page, like you want to do with Yabasic, you can do two things. Either make an account for wikipedia, and then you will be able to move pages, or post a request on the talk page of the article. If you take a look here, I have posted about the move on the talk page, and then we can talk about whether or not we want to make the move. Hopefully that helps!--Gordonrox24 | Talk 14:38, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make helpful changes to the encyclopedia. However, please do not attack other editors, as you did on List of bus models. If you disagree with changes, please talk about the changes and not the editors who made them. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about changing Wikipedia. Thank you.

Bad warning? Please report it here then remove this warning. --GoblinBot4 (talk) 09:15, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

HELPME!Edit

{{helpme}}--213.107.74.132 (talk) 09:19, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Fixed, I think. Cheers! sonia 09:35, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Quick deletion of Deal or No Deal (UK game show)Edit

The page you wrote, Deal or No Deal (UK game show), has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was copied from another Wikipedia. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Auntof6 (talk) 10:38, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Quick deletion of Red bull X2010Edit

The page you wrote, Red bull X2010, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was a page that had little or no meaning. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Auntof6 (talk) 10:41, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

ArchiveEdit

{{helpme}}

Yes, but you need to tell us what you need help with.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 13:15, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
You are an IP so we don't generally archive the talk page until we have to. Perhaps you should create an account if you want to take advantage of archiving talk pages. -DJSasso (talk)

Request deletionEdit

You put the article Velar consonant up for deletion request but I have already fixed the broken links. I will now remove the tag. Minor or Prime 09:51, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Done it for you!--213.107.74.132 (talk) 09:51, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
ok thx a lot Minor or Prime 09:52, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Quick deletion of Jeff MillsEdit

The page you wrote, Jeff Mills, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was a page that didn't say why the subject was notable. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Auntof6 (talk) 10:49, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

TalkbackEdit

Hello, 213.107.74.132. You have new messages at Auntof6's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

An idea:Edit

Okay I have an idea. When you think you want to create an article write it here in my sandbox. I'll let you use mine as you're not allowed one of your own if you're an IP. It will never be deleted there. Once I, or another editor, thinks its good enough we can move it into its proper place. This way you can work on it and it won't be deleted. Does that sound good? :) Normandy (talk) 11:28, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Don't you think thats a good idea? It means you can work an article until its good enough to stay in its proper place. I've asked an admin to undelete the article and put it in my sandbox where we can both work on it. Normandy (talk) 12:06, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
The sandbox is still blank:(--213.107.74.132 (talk) 12:08, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
We'll give the admin a few minutes to do it, should be there soon. Normandy (talk) 12:10, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Why is there QD's on the sandbox page?--213.107.74.132 (talk) 12:11, 19 September 2011 (UTC)UPDATE: fine now--213.107.74.132 (talk) 12:12, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Its because when Barras undeleted the article its what it was like last. It was the QD that you put on the article before it was deleted. I've fixed it now. It will be fine where it is, no-one will delete it and you can work on it. Normandy (talk) 12:14, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Blocked AgainEdit

You have been blocked from changing Wikipedia for 1 week for For blatant disruption of the wiki..

Once the block has ended you can make helpful changes. Please read Wikipedia's blocking policy and remember that adding spam, making changes that do not have a neutral point of view, making personal attacks on others, not respecting other people's privacy, and vandalizing pages are not allowed. If you do any of these things, you will be blocked again.

If you think this block is unfair, you can ask to be unblocked by adding {{Unblock|your reason here}} below. If you cannot do this or the reason is private please send an e-mail to simple-admins-l@lists.wikimedia.org and an administrator will look at your reason and reply. You may want to consider reading our guide to unblock requests before requesting to be unblocked. DJSasso (talk) 14:48, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | unblock | changes) asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason.

Request reason: "Please provide a diff as proof of any bad edits."

Decline reason: "There are various diffs like this one that, are ok if made once or twice, however I am seeing these kind edits in many places. I also see you re-creating articles that have been deleted, only to have them deleted again as not much had been improved. Please take the week off, and come back next week with the mindset that when we criticize your articles, it's not because we don't like or want you, it's because we want to make the best articles possible. When you come back, I hope you will be willing to work with us, and take our advice when writing articles. User:Normandy's idea is a good one. Creating pages in a sandbox, making sure they are up to scratch, and then moving them into mainspace is a good way to write quality articles. We need to make sure that all articles we create are good before we start working on other articles. I look forward to working with you when you come back in a weeks time. Thanks. -- Gordonrox24 | Talk 15:04, 19 September 2011 (UTC)"

British vs. American EnglishEdit

There is nothing wrong with British English, and there is nothing wrong with American English. Both are acceptable here, but you should not change from one to the other without a specific reason. An example of a reason is to use British English in an article that is about a British topic. The topics you changed, Irrational number and Color blindness, are not specifically British so the spelling does not need to be changed. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:02, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Are they specifically American?--213.107.74.132 (talk) 21:05, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
No, they are not specifically either one. In such cases, the spelling should be left as it was. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:07, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

BlockedEdit

What did I do wrong? Diffs please. I got no warning. --213.107.74.132 (talk) 17:32, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

You were warned last time you continuously recreated pages that were deleted. You have been blocked 3 times already, you are past the point of warnings. Each time you do something that you have been warned about in the past the blocks will just keep getting longer. -DJSasso (talk) 17:34, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | unblock | changes) asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason.

Request reason: "What did I do wrong? Diffs please. I got no warning. Proof that DoND UK is uncommon typo? Since I thought it is a common typo, I reverted it. It was good faith. I am sorry, and made a mistake. I want you to understand why I did it. Please tell me why not to unblock me? I promise it's in good faith. It's not fair that I made a mistake trying to edit in good faith. I'm upset about this block, as I promise I meant it to be good. I can understand the previous blocks, but now I know what I'm doing. See here."

Decline reason: "See below. -- Chenzw  Talk  07:07, 30 September 2011 (UTC)"

I've updated my unblock request.

This blocked user (block log | unblock | changes) asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason.

Request reason: "What did I do wrong? Diffs please. I got no warning. Proof that DoND UK is uncommon typo? Since I thought it is a common typo, I reverted it. It was good faith. I am sorry, and made a mistake. I want you to understand why I did it. Please tell me why not to unblock me? I promise it's in good faith. It's not fair that I made a mistake trying to edit in good faith. I'm upset about this block, as I promise I meant it to be good. I can understand the previous blocks, but now I know what I'm doing. I've relised how it's bad to recreate articles. I now know if a page gets deleted, not to recreate even if I think it's best to recreate. I previously thought it's okay to recreate if I got a good reason. I guess not. I really want you to know that I meant it to be a good faith edit, but too late I relised it's wrong. I'm distressed. You blocked an innocent person. See here."

Decline reason: "The evidence is all over the place, and so are the warnings. Further abuse of the unblock process will result in the protection of your talk page. -- Chenzw  Talk  07:07, 30 September 2011 (UTC)"

I'm really worried I will not get unblocked, I meant to be innocent.--213.107.74.132 (talk) 18:10, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
If I was unblocked, I would of reverted this edit:http://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Computer_science&curid=110&diff=3066180&oldid=2825566. I am innocent. Shame. 213.107.74.132 (talk) 18:27, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
And this one: http://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Leonardo_da_Vinci&curid=4654&diff=3066187&oldid=3051587. --213.107.74.132 (talk) 18:30, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
I now know what I did wrong, and will NEVER make this mistake ever again. I regret making a mistake. It's not fair.