User talk:Eptalon/Archive 14

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Racepacket in topic Quick help



Why lowercase letters? And why did you remove my comment? :p --Bsadowski1 09:53, 6 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

We are trying not to feed it.. --Bsadowski1 09:54, 6 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
lcase returns the argument in lowercase; giving it something in uppercase will therefore never match... --Eptalon (talk) 09:58, 6 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Okay. You should of said something in the filter comments... --Bsadowski1 09:59, 6 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
How come you put tagging on and now it's disabled? I am trying to prevent a persistent vandal from vandalizing. --Bsadowski1 15:00, 6 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

(<-) I haven't touched the state (disabled/enabled) of the filter before; now I ticked the "enabled" box... --Eptalon (talk) 15:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Strange because I thought I had enabled it. --Bsadowski1 16:31, 6 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Move requested


Could you move Erosion to Soil erosion? Its content is soil-erosion-specific, and I want to create a general account of erosion, as in enWP. I can't make these moves, apparently. Thanks. Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:27, 8 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Soil erosion on enWP redirects to erosion, so is the move necessary? Peterdownunder (talk) 07:02, 8 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
  1. Erosion is the main concept, Soil erosion is a sub-concept. If both are treated on the same page, the page name should be 'Erosion'.
  2. On Simple, I would plan to keep the Soil erosion page separate. It is primarily a problem of human farming methods, and has its own social history angle. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:41, 8 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
I moved the page, and left a redirect (from Erosion, to Soil erosion). I trust Macdonald-ross. When both pages are there, we can still discuss merging them, if the concepts are "closely related". Note however, that in the contexts of material science, medicine, and computer graphics one can also talk about "erosion"; these concepts have nothing to do with the erosion of soil which is geological. --Eptalon (talk) 14:45, 8 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Some help, please


Hi there, Mr. Admin. Some dude called IanP had a brief chat with me on both of our talk pages and he's changed his signature to I am a bassist, which he claims to be a parody of mine. I think he's misusing the signature function and treating WP like a social network, and most important of all, I don't want him to be my meatpuppet. Can you ask him to stop this non-constructive behaviour? P.S. keep me anonymous. I am a violinist (talk) 11:31, 21 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

(tps) I shall have a word on his talk page and also bring this up over at WP:AN, unless someone else sees this first. I've given him several warnings with regards to using the site as a social network, enough is enough. Thanks, Goblin 12:35, 21 January 2011 (UTC) I ♥ The Rambling Man!Reply
Agreed. I think it is a good idea to bring it up at AN. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 12:36, 21 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Although, to be honest, I actually think a straight disruption block wouldn't be out of order indefinitely. Though I haven't got the magic button. Goblin 12:39, 21 January 2011 (UTC) I ♥ S3CR3T!Reply
The user has received several warnings recently, so I blocked him for one week. Kansan (talk) 15:22, 21 January 2011 (UTC)Reply



Feeling a bit negative today... I don't think the importance & uses section could be enlarged much with any benefit. Also, I'm not anxious to spend time on PGAs because it interfers with time I spend on new articles.

I'm distressed by the low standard of GAs and VGAs on this wiki; most of them seem not even worth proposing. Halophile is an OK page, but nothing more. The standard of English is dreadful (I'm not talking about its simplicity, but its lack of style and flow). Personally, I wouldn't have dreamed of putting up a page in this condition, but I won't say so on the PGA page.

I'd most like to see an upgrade of the criteria to include (as enWP does) a clear statement that articles must be well written. Again, I won't propose changes in the system because it's pointless. Certain people always vote against change, and nothing I've supported has ever got through.

The big plus of Simple is that good pages once put up are much more stable than in enWP, though of course much less read. Sorry for being negative, I appreciate your asking. Macdonald-ross (talk) 11:22, 24 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

I cannot change the crowd, and you see yourself how much effort is currently put into the GA/VGA process. Even if we can "re-adjust" the criteria (and find some way of saying "well-written" that is quantifiable/verifiable), I doubt the community will put much effort in producing "GA/VGA"-quality articles. I will start discussion what we do regarding these articles (probably on WP:ST), but I can imagine what the outcome will be....--Eptalon (talk) 18:37, 24 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Name change


Can I rename my account from "User:Slipknot1" to "User:a7x"? I don't want to simply create a new account since my current one has over 6800+ edits. Thanks, —stay (sic)! 16:36, 1 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

I have renamed you, but please note that due to technical limitation the first letter of a username is uppercase. --Eptalon (talk) 19:42, 1 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Lolz, thank you.  :) —stay (sic)! 19:45, 1 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

A tireless contributor

  The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For Eptalon, who has now been editing on the Simple English Wikipedia for more than five years, and has made an amazing 35,000 edits. Wow! Peterdownunder (talk) 12:22, 5 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

IP deletion


First of all, I will probably not respond again as I am away for long periods of time. We have several computers on the IP side so it doesn't matter if people know my IP. After all, I edited quite a lot as an IP. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 20:01, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

That's not what my intent was; User pages are only edited by the user itself, usually. Leaving your IP would allow people to connect a link easily (hence the oversight). Do ont worry about it too much; continue editing as an IP if you like, but don't edit your user page as one; this was the reason for the oversight. --Eptalon (talk) 22:08, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply



Hi! I haven't done much on Simple, I started Dejima and wanted some feedback. Am I on the right track? What is the main pointer you can give me? (FYI, I'm familiar with the wikipedia family, so know the basics (see primarily Commons:User:Deadstar etc.)). Thanks for your help. Deadstar (talk) 11:23, 16 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

As far as I can tell the article looks good, there are certain issues (references get their own section; generally, punctuation is before the ref tag, perhaps use the {{cite book}},{{cite web}} templates) but they are very small. We do have a template, {{enwp based}} for attribution, where we copied most from enwp, and then simplified it. I cannot comment on the content, as I am not familiar with it, but I'd say the article is a good start. You can look at Good and Very good articles for examples; these are the two categories we have of "better-quality" articles, in English, they call them "featured article", I think. Anyway, I think that article is a good start, and I look forward to your contributions... - No one will tell you, but first and foremost, this Wikipedia needs editors. Anyway, I hope you have fun editing here.... --Eptalon (talk) 11:54, 16 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for that - as I am mainly active on Commons, I have very little experience with references and tags etc. so will have to learn. Will keep your comments in mind. Kind regards, Deadstar (talk) 12:04, 16 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposal. for GoogleTrans-Speak to be a gadget on simple Wikipedia


As one of the aims for the simple English wiki is to help people learn English, I propose my GoogleTrans-Speak gadget for the wiki.

Using GoogleTrans a popup will appear near the cursor, having a foreign language translation of the word (or selected text < 500 characters), when the cursor is over a word in a web page and the SHIFT key is pressed.

The help file on the enwiki for the gadget is at:


The gadget has been running on the enwiki for around 18 months now and has had around 8500 installs (after 6 months of use). It is currently running on 12 wikis.

It can be run on the simple enwiki by including the following javascript in your vector.js file:


This version has the following text to speech addition:

   if you select some text (<4000 characters), put the cursor within that text, and hold the ESCape key down for a second, then a sound bar will appear. By clicking on the play bar of the sound bar, you will then hear the text selected.

The idea is that people wishing to learn English may not just want the translation of a word or two (or a sentence or two) they don't know, but also may wish to hear the sentence to train their ears (and thus learn to listen to English as well as read it).

I use the gadget (on my private test system) to read French and Spanish webpages, including the eswiki and the frwiki, since I can read those languages but cannot understand spoken speech of those tongues.

The Text To Speech is actually done on my LINUX box in Canberra Australia, so I would like to try out the feature on a small wiki (like the Simple wiki) so the number of requests isn't too large.

Open Source Text to Speech systems are used:

   Festival for English and Spanish
   Espeak for the other languages
   Mbrola contributes the voices for espeak in French and some other languages.

On Firefox 3.5+ a HTML5 audio tag plays an OGG sound file. On IE9 a HTML5 audio tag plays an MP3 sound file On other systems, Flash is needed, a Flash sound bar will play an MP3 sound file.

I think some people learning English may like to play a computer voice of some text in wiki articles. It's a good way to learn to listen to English. You can have the translation into your native language, and then you can listen to the English text selected right in front of you. Listening to the radio and TV is often difficult because the native speakers speak too fast. Festival TTS does not speak too quickly.

You can play the sound bar more than once if you need to listen several times.

It's a good language learning tool and I thought it would be a good gadget for the simple English wiki, which is a language learning wiki.

Endo999 (talk) 07:41, 21 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Patroller right


Hi! I've remove the flag you've given to yourself. I saw in a deletion entry something like "admins aren't autopatrolled", but this is wrong. The patroll right is part of the admin bit, so patroller is unneeded. See Special:ListGroupRights. -Barras (talk) 15:02, 8 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Elisa von wallis


Thanks for deleting Elisa von wallis. I tried QD as an obvious hoax (50th in line...) but my laptop kept crashing --Bärliner 14:59, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

No worries, it was pretty obvious. :) Even though Kufstein has a long history, less than 20k people live there today; the only university in Tyrol is in its capital, Innsbruck.--Eptalon (talk) 15:09, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Troublesome edits


Can you get the User:Morgankevinj person off my back? He's doing some silly things, probably with a bot. Attributions on talk pages are not signed. See sample on my talk page. Macdonald-ross (talk) 20:07, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Glad its not just my attributions he's {{subst:unsigned}} :) Bärliner 20:55, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
He was warned for it. Kansan (talk) 22:19, 19 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Random Fat Guy


Toboar? Should the ban be extended, or investigated further first? Wikipedia:Simple_talk#Unban_me_please Bärliner 20:55, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Toboar asked for community input (a review). The community is able to review his ban without the need of unblocking him. Besides if he is really socking all the time, this probably won't be favorable on a review. --Eptalon (talk) 22:27, 19 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

'Problem' article


Hello - I've expanded the 'Problem' article you created. I hope you will take a look. I hope it can be more of an encyclopaedic article, but things i have writen may seem contraversial. I am not sure about how putting sources into Simple English Wikipedia works - but I will find out soon. I am just working backwards from an artcile I created on Makaton - which had seemed like a huge omission. Kathybramley (talk) 09:44, 30 March 2011 (UTC)Reply



Would you care to review your 'complex' flag on Jean-Baptiste de Lamarck? I'm probably too close to it to judge. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:54, 1 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

I have added some sentences concerning his life, and created a few red links (to scientists of the time). As to his parents, I am unable to decide whether they merit a link. I have removed the complex tag, the remaining issues are probably a matter of personal judgement and do not warrant it any more. --Eptalon (talk) 09:18, 1 April 2011 (UTC)Reply



Is there a "possible BLP issue or vandalism" edit filter? If not, can you use the source and enable one here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SEPTActaMTA8235 (talkcontribs) --Eptalon (talk) 20:27, 7 April 2011 (UTC)I keep forgetting to sign  Reply

Edit filters are rather simple. Unless you know what makes a "possible BLP issue" and can formulate that in 2-3 sentences, I don't see a way to write an edit filter to detect this.--Eptalon (talk) 20:27, 7 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Are you an EFM on en? You can try copying the source. --SEPTActaMTA8235 (talk) 20:36, 7 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
I do have access to most edit filters, give me the number on en, and I'll try and copy? --Eptalon (talk) 21:02, 7 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
It's #189; 39, 46, 135, 172, 225, 260, and 273 might also be of interest. --SEPTActaMTA8235 (talk) 21:09, 7 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
An emoticon/internet slang filter that catches ":D", ":P", ":)", etc also might be helpful. --SEPTActaMTA8235 (talk) 21:10, 7 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

be careful


please be careful. you created the page Sweat shop, but we already have one called Sweatshop. If you keep doing this ur gonna get blocked. (talk) 15:26, 8 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I should probably have checked first. Should I start a discussion to get a community ban then? --Eptalon (talk) 15:29, 8 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
ban from what? I said block not ban. read up. (talk) 15:30, 8 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
From editing SimpleWP. I could easily re-offend; only a ban will offer a protection in the long run...--Eptalon (talk) 15:31, 8 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Uh ya then. you's dont no a thing about this place . i am an admin here. (talk)
HELLO RESPOND TO ME. (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
NO you are NOT, you are just an IP address. IPs can't be admins!</rant> --SEPTActaMTA8235 (talk) 15:50, 8 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
That's a school IP. --SEPTActaMTA8235 (talk) 15:50, 8 April 2011 (UTC)Reply



I meant to type "secondary", but I typed "primary". Thanks for the fix! --—SEPTActaMTA8235— (t c l) 20:16, 27 April 2011 (UTC)Reply



Hallo Eptalon, bitte schaue kurz auf deiner de-Seite vorbei. Gruß --Gleiberg (talk) 11:45, 5 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Question about titles


Hi, Eptalon, i have a question, is there any policy with regards to titles? I saw this and was trying to make it better adding the taxobox, but i'm not sure if in here they use species name or the common name. Greetings.--Jcaraballo (talk) 19:38, 17 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello there, I have no idea what to use there; checks of a few pages seems to show the common name is used more often though (even if that's probably a bad idea). See Scallop, Gastropoda, Dormouse, rat as examples. But to my knowledge there is no policy, or guideline. --Eptalon (talk) 21:19, 17 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
I read this while on Ep's page. enWP uses both methods, so there is no general rule. If using a common name, the name must really be common: 'sparrow', 'mouse' etc. It may be best to use the words which our typical younger users would search for. Redirecting alternative titles is an absolute must: never forget to do this. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:06, 24 May 2011 (UTC)Reply



I want to make something clear. It shows on Volunteer that it will be copied to the Simple English Wiktionary. Will it be deleted from here? Thanks! Crazymonkey1123 (talk) 00:53, 19 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

The problem with the article, in its current form is that it is a "dictionary definition"; look for example at the EnWP article to see the difference. The article can be changed, so it no longer is that dictionary definition though...--Eptalon (talk) 07:29, 19 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
I don't know how to fix it up so it is not a dictionary definition. If it is imported to the Wiktionary, will the history be merged during the import? Crazymonkey1123 (talk) 00:13, 20 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
Just a note, the volunteer page already exists on Wiktionary. So, if we don't want to expand it, we can always add {{Wi}}.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 03:46, 20 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Someone needs help


Would you please read the last item on my talk page, where a person asks for help. Can we find him a mentor? His article has multiple problems (not wikified, not simplified, poss copyright violation), but he seems a polite young person who wants to improve. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:57, 24 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Eptalon. You have new messages at Soumit ban's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.



Is it just me, or this is the same as this?--Jcaraballo (talk) 20:07, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Active users


Ep, you are very important to this wiki, and should definitely be on the list of WP:Active users. Regards, Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:41, 24 June 2011 (UTC)Reply



I just saw you have chnaged my membership of nothing to patroller and I want thank you for your trust. --Faramarzreply 17:47, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome. I hope you continue to contribute here as you did in the past. The patroller flag means that the new pages you create no longer get highlited in the patrol log. --Eptalon (talk) 19:20, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

User Racepacket


Just alerting you to a discussion. The pages this user has put up are beyond anything else on this wiki for incomprehensibility. I think we have a problem. See my comments on his talk page and mine. Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:07, 25 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

I am aware of the complexity of the articles; but I was under the impression that in time they'd be sipmlified. If they aren't we canm still delete as "complex article form another wp..."...--Eptalon (talk) 20:00, 25 July 2011 (UTC)Reply



I like very much your new article on Siméon Denis Poisson. Thank you for creating it. Racepacket (talk) 18:37, 7 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Joseph Fourier


I transferred material to Joseph, and edited it. Jean Fourier is now a redirect. Thank you for the suggestion. Macdonald-ross (talk) 04:43, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Same content on two articles


Hi Eptalon. I've come across the article Aude and simplified it a little. But then I noticed the content of the article Tautavel man was nearly the same. Either the second page should be expanded, or the first page should be summarized. And if we summarize Aude then we should copy the simplified/corrected content over. Thoughts? Yottie =talk= 15:13, 13 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I think it would probably be better to expand "Tautavel man", you'll find resp. material on the French page, which seems to be themost complete. Today, the French departement is known for wine-growing, you will probably have come across the sparkling wine "Blanquette de Limoux"; there is also some tourism (Caracassonne started as a Bastide, there are probably other medieval towns). AFAIK historic tourism is focused on the "Cathars". There is some industry (brick-making). In that context, the "Tautavel Man" is probably only of marginal importance. So, if we can't expand Tautavel man, we could reomve the section from "Aude", and mention it in a sentence, with a link. --Eptalon (talk) 10:43, 14 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Sounds good. I'll try to work on both. Thanks, Yottie =talk= 11:20, 14 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Muammar al-Gaddafi


Hi Eptalon...I have opened a discussion at Talk:Muammar al-Gaddafi regarding a current dispute over the article. Since you have been involved in the dispute, your comments are welcome at the page to make an acceptable version of this article. Thanks, Either way (talk) 04:02, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Germanic (P|p)aganism


I came across two articles, Germanic Paganism (upper-case P) and Germanic paganism (lower-case P). You created the one with the lower-case P, so I was wondering if you would take a look at them both and see if they're the same thing. Thanks! --Auntof6 (talk) 04:59, 25 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

As a quick look, the lowercase p version seems to be what was practiced beforehand, and what was later replaced by Christianity. The version with the uppecase P should be merged to Asatru, as inicated. Asatru is the attempt to revive the old (lowercase p) version. Asatru is a religion that does not rely on revelations. Asatru has been a religion since 1972 in Iceland, in most other nordic countries since the mid 1990s. --Eptalon (talk) 20:47, 25 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
OK, thanks. :) --Auntof6 (talk) 00:08, 27 August 2011 (UTC)Reply



ntmu --Seaca (talk) 22:26, 4 September 2011 (UTC)Reply



I went thru your last comment and did typo fixes, I hope you did not mind :) Jon@talk:~$ 01:42, 11 September 2011 (UTC)Reply



Hi Eptalon. I just wanted your opinion on this article. I think it should be deleted but I can't find a reason... Let me know if you think it should be deleted. (I did not create that article) Orashmatash 19:30, 8 October 2011 (UTC) I like... Computer science!Reply

Pretty much likes a start at getting en:Iðunn, no? - So what would be your reason for deleting it? --Eptalon (talk) 19:34, 8 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
The reason is actually why I came to you... I can't find one. It doesn't really give us any useful information on the subject, because the article doesn't tell us anything about the "Asgardians" that Idun supposedly kept young... The article doesn't look encyclopaedic in any way whatsoever, but I can't find a deletion reason in the criteria. Should it actually even be deleted, or just heavily improved? Orashmatash 19:49, 8 October 2011 (UTC) I like... Computer science!Reply
Deleted, and redirected to Iðunn (Housekeeping). As this is an encyclopedia anyone can change feel free to improve the article...--Eptalon (talk) 22:31, 8 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Okay, thanks. I know absolutely nothing about "Iðunn", I just came across the article when I was patrolling Special:NewPages. --Orashmatash 21:02, 9 October 2011 (UTC) I like... History!Reply

Template:Infobox Tea


While going through the list of unused templates, I found this one that you created in 2007. Do you have plans to use it, or can I QD it? --Auntof6 (talk) 00:20, 16 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Teamwork Barnstar

  The Teamwork Barnstar
For Eptalon, who took part in the big biography weekend in October 21-26, 2011. With help from 15 other editors, 48 new biography articles were created. Thanks for being part of the team. Peterdownunder (talk) 23:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quick deletion of Template:CephBase Family and Template:CephBase Genus


The page you wrote, Template:CephBase Family, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was deprecated or replaced by a newer template and are completely unused and not linked to. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Auntof6 (talk) 23:00, 28 October 2011 (UTC)Reply


The page you wrote, Template:CephBase Genus, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was deprecated or replaced by a newer template and are completely unused and not linked to. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Auntof6 (talk) 23:01, 28 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Eptalon. I just wanted to let you know that these two templates no longer work, so I took them out of the articles (one each) that used them and have QD'd them. --Auntof6 (talk) 23:03, 28 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Abuse Filter


Could you take a look at rule 12. It gave me a false positive while I was doing a simple edit. Best, Jon@talk:~$ 03:13, 9 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

... because all the letters were lowercase. πr2 (talk • changes) 03:15, 9 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
I know why it was triggered. :) I just wanted Eptalon to take a look and perhaps make a modification to it. However, since my last writing, a change was committed the the rule that assuages multiple issues. So we are good now. Regards, Jon@talk:~$ 03:20, 9 November 2011 (UTC)Reply



Perhaps you are more of an expert than I am on Mormonism. (I have only taken the tour in Salt Lake City.) An IP added a comment about the status of the King James Bible in the LDS church. Although his edit was problematic, the idea of adding this to the article is valid. Perhaps you can come up with a simple sentence? Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 14:00, 12 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Three Body Problem


Hi Eptalon! Just letting you know that since there was already a page called Three-body problem, I have merged your new article with that one. You can find it by clicking here. Thanks! --Orashmatash 22:29, 15 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

New page filter


Hello Eptalon. You're the only person I've seen editing the filters, and I just wanted to let you know that I saw something incorrect. Patrick Murphy and Frank Drake were tagged as "(one-case-only article)" and in neither case was that correct. Just wanted to let you know if you wanted to make the filter work properly. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:16, 17 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

I know that filter 12 is not working as it should; that is why I have posted a respective heading on the admin noticepboard, and changed the filter action from disallowing to simply tagging. When I have time this week-end I will look into making the filter work; ideas include:
  • Separate filters for uppercase and lowercase articles
I need to familiarize myself more with the regular expression syntax used. And yes, I am one of perhaps three people editing the filters.--Eptalon (talk) 08:24, 18 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Update: I have changed the filter, and hope it is running as expected; at the moment, it is only tagging, to see if it works as expected.--Eptalon (talk) 09:51, 21 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Samuels vandal.


is vandalizing a lot of pages. Just a heads up. --Crobau (talk) 09:45, 21 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Capital City Weekend


Please take part in the Capital City Weekend challenge. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 21:26, 26 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

New user that may be trying to impersonate you


Are you User:Emre002? His or her brand new user page was just created from scratch with user boxes that say he/she is an admin, bureaucrat, checkuser, and a few other things that look a bit fishy. The reason I'm asking you is that when I click on the "verify" link in the checkuser userbox, it comes up with a page with your userid. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:25, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

No, I am not. I will take care of it, though. --Eptalon (talk) 10:31, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quick help


Could you please move User:Racepacket/System of linear equations on top of the Inuse at System of linear equations? Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 21:07, 18 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Many thanks! Racepacket (talk) 21:19, 18 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Return to the user page of "Eptalon/Archive 14".