This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

If you find this page on a site that is not Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. The page may be old and the owner of this page may not have a relationship with sites that are not Wikipedia. The original page is located at http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Fr33kman.

Wikimedia Foundation
Wikimedia Foundation
This is the User talk page for Fr33kman, where you can send messages and comments to Fr33kman.








oh brother mr. IP address is breaking out the sockpuppets change

aw shit 𝕂𝕖𝕣𝕠𝕡𝕡𝕚𝕂𝕚𝕕 (talk) 17:54, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

just revert them. Don't talk to them or warn them as it'll just make you a target fr33kman 18:03, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

RFDs closed as keep change

Are you going to remove the RFD template and add the {{Oldrfd}} to the RFDs you close as keep? Kk.urban (talk) 17:16, 29 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, forgot, old brain. Thanks for the nudge :) fr33kman 17:17, 29 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Help! change

Hey I created a page 'Derna' which is about a 'City in Libya' but in it's short description it shows 'river in Belarus'.

Can you tell me whats the problem or How can I change it/can you change it? Faraz Sualeh (talk · contribs) 04:10, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

fixed the infobox fr33kman 22:42, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Since I was here.. The Wikidata was pointed to the wrong article. I fixed that. I also moved the page the Derna, Libya and cleaned up the inbound links. None were to the river, but there was one to place in Romania. The main page should need to be either the most common name or a disambig page, but Ill leave that as a redirect for now. Pure Evil (talk) 23:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
thx fr33kman 23:46, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks to both of you... Faraz Sualeh (talk) 04:14, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks change

Appreciate, but I have been in the position here already for a spell (as well as others) and have no interest in doing it again. There are only rare times it could be useful but I just toss those up for others (to often ignore.. but oh well, I did my part) Pure Evil (talk) 23:32, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

ok, no problems. It can be a pain in the ass, lol fr33kman 23:33, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Signing when closing RfDs.. change

Hello, don't forget to sign when you close RfDs... Eptalon (talk) 07:48, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

I know, I've missed a few, but I've usually gone back and signed them although I might have missed a couple. Getting back into the swing of things :) fr33kman 09:48, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Also, remember to remove the in progress template and the tags around it. That was one of the reasons the count was out of synch earlier. Thanks! -- Auntof6 (talk) 09:52, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, I replied tothat on WP:AN. fr33kman 09:55, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sundar Pichai change

Would you please undelete the good revisions of this page, but not the bad ones? Kk.urban (talk) 16:48, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sure thing, my bad! :) fr33kman 16:51, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
What I meant is this: [1] as Ferien did, which only restored the revisions up to 08:25, 19 August 2023‎ and left out the vandalism (which seems to be all from one person under different IPs) and the reversions of this vandalism. Kk.urban (talk) 16:56, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Is it not just easier for you to select what revision you wish from the history and save it as the current version?? fr33kman 16:58, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

bro revert my talk page change

it aint letting me 𝕂𝕖𝕣𝕠𝕡𝕡𝕚𝕂𝕚𝕕 (talk) 16:34, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Done Next time, hit "History", choose the most recent good revision and then save that as a new page. :) fr33kman 16:37, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
The issue was that the Burger King image covered the History button. 𝕂𝕖𝕣𝕠𝕡𝕡𝕚𝕂𝕚𝕕 (talk) 16:46, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
It appeared to have covered it, if you hovered your cursor over the history button you could click on it. That is what I did. :) fr33kman 16:48, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Talkback change

 
Hello, Fr33kman. You have new messages at WP:AN.
Message added 11:54, 5 October 2023 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

MathXplore (talk) 11:54, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Arrowsmith school change

The article was being edited when you suddenly deleted it. The citations are from Google scholar making it WP:GNG and already has had an entry on other Wikis going back years. I don't know what you're doing. Serener (talk) 23:53, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

I didn't see anything that claimed it was notable. You must explain why it is notable, not just write about it. fr33kman 23:56, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

I put in citations as required and these are third party citations besides 2 from the founder itself. I ensured to keep out promotional stuff and had numerous citations arguing the opposite. How do you suddenly delete a fully cited article without discussion? It's beyond me.--Serener (talk) 00:01, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

You can add hundreds of citations without explaining HOW it is notable. Citations from the founder are not neutral and not reliable. What notable alumni has there been, what MAJOR awards has the school received. What has been written abut it in newspapers, journals, books, TV programmes etc... fr33kman fr33kman 00:09, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
This is a well-written article about a notable school. What you wrote was not. fr33kman 00:18, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
BTW: do not just copy and pste from enwiki to here. Read and follow WP:CW first. fr33kman 00:24, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
It really should be pointed out that Serener has been a contributor to the En. wiki article you point out is a well written article about a notable school (the school that is the subject of this article under construction). Their contributions to that article go back to 2019 with no administrative actions and only a welcome message on their talk page. Not coming across as a trouble maker. Pure Evil (talk) 00:49, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Never claimed they were a trouble maker, only that the article as it was made on this wiki did not meet A4. That's why I pointed it out to them and how to change it to fit our needs. fr33kman 01:01, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Which they said they were doing ("The article was being edited ") when you deleted it only 5 minutes after its creation (23:49, October 5, 2023 from 23:44, October 5, 2023). Just saying, you could have given them a little more time to address the issues. especially as it does seem they were not given the opportunity for a wait template between it being tagged, them being alerted to the issue and your deletion of the article. Pure Evil (talk) 02:09, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
There was no QD tag placed, I simply deleted it. There was no {{in progress}} template and the entire aricle was 90% about the founder and her life with no mention of anything claiming notability. If they were a major author of the enwiki article they could have brought it over in a much better format than the disorganised mess it was in. When I create an article I don't do it in bits and pieces, I keep working and pressing preview until I'm 90% happy with it. Then I save it. If an in progress template was placed this could all have been avoided. fr33kman 02:17, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
If you bothered looking at the sources, you'd see there is much more than the subject itself and the majority were secondary sources, mostly critical of the subject but from an academic perspective. Instead of messaging me or raising objections on the talk page or reading through the sources, you got trigger-happy and just deleted all that hardwork. It must be more fun hitting the deletion button than making an effort to bring up any legit objections -none of which there were if anyone bothered to check. No wonder Wikipedia has the reputation it does.--Serener (talk) 22:36, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your kind words. fr33kman 22:43, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sub page message change

New message on User talk:Fr33kman/PleaseComeBack Pure Evil (talk) 22:12, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

What is the meaning of this? fr33kman 00:05, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
There are no title and text parameter on {{box}}. Maybe you should change it. ginaan(T/C) 00:22, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Why me? I don't use the template; not that I know of anyways. I'll look into it though. fr33kman 00:34, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Oh, now I understand what you meant:) Sorry for the misunderstanding. --ginaan(T/C) 00:45, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
I've compared it to the enwiki version and there seems to be no difference. I'm not an expert with wiki markup language so I'd ask someone else if I were you; perhaps eptalon, Vermont, or Auntof6. Or else ask someone from another project like dungodung etc... Good luck. :) fr33kman 00:46, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
The page in your user space was using the box template with two depreciated parameters. This caused the template to place the page in an error category and to not display the information at all. Being it is the page of an active user, rather than just fixing the issue, I informed you of what was causing both proplegs on your page as well as what was needed to be done to correct the error and display problem. Pure Evil (talk) 01:12, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Ah, now it makes more sense. I'll look into it. It's odd though how nobody had told me about it until now. I've had the same basic pages since 2008. Thx fr33kman 01:39, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Ok, I'm still not seeing what the problem is. Am I miss using the {{box}} template somewhere? Because I'm not seeing it. Can you please point out the exact problem? fr33kman 01:43, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps you could be so kind as to fix the problem and then show me the diff so I can understand the issue. Thxv:) fr33kman 01:54, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
Ok, I've got it now. Thanks for pointing it out. Old brain just wasn't seeing what you meant. I've deleted the page now. fr33kman 02:04, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hcf hcg uhce change

Can you please do a mass deletion of pages added by this vandal? #prodraxis connect 16:30, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Done Thx for reporting it fr33kman 16:38, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thejo Kumari Amudala change

I left a !vote on the AFD after I went through the sources and did some other digging. Biggest (not at all) shock was that the page was created on EN as well, multiple times, and always deleted as a G5 [2] with the creator being part of the Amansharma111 sock farm. I had also tagged Ujjawal Trivedi here as G11 (which you deleted and thank you!), but got to wondering and to no surprise, it's been created multiple times on EN and deleted as G5 as created by a sock of Amansharma111 - [3]. Think it's worth having a CU check if the two accounts here are related, plus any other accounts or just not worry about it? Ravensfire (talk) 22:58, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, it's probably a good idea. fr33kman 22:59, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Will do this evening. Alas, yard work is calling... Ravensfire (talk) 23:01, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
It's important to alert the CUs even if it's a duck. It let's them check for any other puppets that may be hidden. fr33kman 23:11, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Request for CU created at Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser#Amansharma111. I've got a feeling that over half of the promotional articles I've tagged in the past 2-3 months are all from this sock farm. Would be nice to see them get frustrated and stop. Ravensfire (talk) 02:15, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Very possible fr33kman 19:56, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

You've got mail! change

 
Hello, Fr33kman. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience.
Message added 21:47, 10 October 2023 (UTC). You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

Bobherry Talk My Changes 21:47, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Simple English? change

I'm wondering, do you see any improvement in this change? [4] It seems to have just made the text more complex, but maybe there's some corrections I'm missing? Kk.urban (talk) 23:18, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

No, it makes the text more complex and should be changed back. fr33kman 23:20, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your input. I changed it back. Kk.urban (talk) 23:24, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
No worries :) fr33kman 23:25, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

List of Eastern Caribbean people change

There's no justification to delete this for "A4: The page is about a person, group, company, product or website, and does not claim notability". There was an RFD for it, so can't you delete it for that reason? Kk.urban (talk) 00:45, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

It was a mistake. fr33kman 01:35, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Could you please change the reason for deletion? List of Eastern Caribbean people - Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2023/List of Eastern Caribbean people
Also, there is a talk page and a bunch of redirects to this deleted page. Kk.urban (talk) 03:17, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
I can't alter the reason for a deletion after it's been deleted. Ill fix the talk page. fr33kman 03:41, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
I've seen other administrators undelete the page and then delete it again, to fix the reason. For example, see the deletion logs of Wikipedia:Pools and Vijay Nagar. Kk.urban (talk) 04:53, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Kk.urban: Is that better now? :) fr33kman 21:41, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yes, thanks! Kk.urban (talk) 21:47, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please help me about a page change

Hello, I hope you are well. I have created a page name "Ario Nahavandi" and I used Language check Ai to make sure the context is in "Simple English" Format, but you have deleted the page. Another thing that was mentioned was notability, which I can understand as I carefully followed the "General notability guidelines" page to address the context and biography. Do you mind to tell me which part should to be edit or fixed then I can do it to get the page published?

I appreciate it, In advance.

Best Alanwhite12 (talk) 18:11, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

I took a look at the deleted page and it seems to me that you would need to have more references that support his notability. Right now there aren't enough sources that are independent, well-known, (i.e.:major national or international) , have a neutral point of view and have no conflict of interest. Well known national newspaper would be a good start. Well known magazines like Rolling Stone would also help establish his notability. If he was to be signed to a well-known record label this would make him notable on its own. I hope this helps, fr33kman 18:20, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much, I will try to gather more recourses. Could you please tell me how i can return the page back to edit the references? it has been deleted, or should i just create a new page? thanks Alanwhite12 (talk) 21:57, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
I could undelete it and place it your userspace if you wish, or you can just redo it. fr33kman 22:00, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yes please that would be appreciated if you undelete it then i can work on it. many thanks! 2A02:6B68:3909:0:61E3:6541:37D1:558B (talk) 22:11, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Done it's located User:Alanwhite12/Ario Nahavandi You've got 3 days to show me some improvment fr33kman 22:26, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Revert my mistake change

Hey idk how while doing an edit at Narges Mohammadi i mistakenly removed a whole section, so just revert the edit... i don't get the option to undo previous edits so i can't.🙂 Faraz Sualeh (talk) 21:35, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

It's done. Don't worry to much, we all make mistakes. I just imported a template and broke two others in the processfr33kman 21:37, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Faraz Sualeh (talk) 21:41, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

You've got mail! change

 
Hello, Fr33kman. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience.
Message added 22:00, 11 October 2023 (UTC). You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

Bobherry Talk My Changes 22:00, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Kendra Lust change

Hi fr33kman, I hope you're well, Regarding Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2023/Kendra Lust;
WP:ITSNOTABLE isn't a valid for keeping and whilst the subject does have articles on other projects it was deemed on EN (whom are very stringent) that she wasn't notable and as such was deleted there,
Also Eptalon hasn't provided any evidence of any notability - Pure Evil gave a valid reason for deletion and it's the Keepers job to counteract deletion claims with a valid reason to keep with proof which imho was not done,
Looking at it in a neutral way PureEvil's comment held the most weight and he provided more than just "Delete - Not notable" which is what Eptalon's !vote basically is,

Would you maybe reconsider your closure please ?, If not I'll head over to DRV but thought I'd ask first, Have a pleasant weekend fr33kman :),
Many thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010Talk 23:07, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

No, I did my own research and did not rely on Eptalon's alone. The consensus was 50:50 for "reasons" so I did a tie-break and did the research myself and decided to keep. Please do take it to DRV if you feel otherwise. Thx :) fr33kman 23:25, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
If any other admin wishes to overturn my desicion, I am fine with that. fr33kman 23:33, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Okay brilliant, Could I further ask what research or what sources made you go with !keep?, I'm simply trying to better understand the reasoning behind it as you may have seen or found things I haven't or you may be aware of certain policies that I'm not, Many thanks, –Davey2010Talk 23:46, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Sure, apart from passing NACTOR which can be used to contribute to GNG there was the number of products that have been created using her persona such as a journal, posters, and other such material is not created for nobodies; the fact that ChatGPT knows who she is; articles in reliable sources that mention her[5],[6],Rolling Stone etc...; Being in The UK Sun; Many articles in Sportskeeda; Being charged by the US SEC[7] (that is in the news); and the sheer number of videos she's in, amongst other stuff that are on loads of other websites, and that's she's on other Wikipedia's, led me to believe she meets GNG. It's a straw that broke the camel's back scenario. There is just too much mention of her for her not to be notable. Hope this helps! :) fr33kman 01:29, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi, Many thanks for providing sources and for your analysis on this, I can now understand your closure and I actually partially agree with it, As she's not on EN I don't fully agree with it but you make some valid points and you have done due diligence in researching this and leaving your feedback which I appreciate a lot,
Thank you for taking the time to explain this and for providing sources :), Many thanks, Kind Regards, –Davey2010Talk 00:47, 15 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
No problems, anytime I can help let me know. :) fr33kman 00:54, 15 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Basic English combined wordlist change

Words can't be added to Wikipedia:Basic English combined wordlist, right? Kk.urban (talk) 16:11, 15 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Correct, they are fixed word lists. They can not be added to. fr33kman 16:12, 15 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
I thought so, I just wanted to make sure. I have reverted a change to the list. Kk.urban (talk) 16:15, 15 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Great, good work! :) fr33kman 16:16, 15 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Block please change

There is an active vandal, can you please block them? Kk.urban (talk) 21:47, 15 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Done. Thank you for using my talk page as it pings my phone so I know that there is something I must do. It's often the fastest way of contacting me. Cheer! :) fr33kman 21:51, 15 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Article about Israel-Hamas war change

(24) or 23

If you want to write that, then my plan is to not change that, for now.--Not sure that I will be back to this talk page, anytime soon.--If this post was helpful, then fine. 2001:2020:30B:510C:C8C7:64DE:7270:1A3B (talk) 03:09, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

I didn't write that, I merely copyedited it. fr33kman 03:44, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Request change

Fr33kman, Hello, I'm Aviram7 and I request for rollback features, because I have rollback right on metawiki, enwiki, hiwiki, Currently I working on different wiki to reduce spam and vandalism also,sometimes make difficulties to revert on simple wiki from Swviewer,if you feel comfort about my request, so please grant me rollback right for temporary first. Kind regards Aviram NoSurprisesPlease 12:40, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please ask for rollback on the RfP page. It looks though like you are a new user here. We only normally give rollback to established users. fr33kman 14:50, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Fr33kman, Thanks for reply ; Yep! I was joined simple english wiki last 2 year ago, but I don't active here before, but I currently active in reverting vandalism on this wiki,if I make a second time request on RfP, but i don't think any admin accept my request if i made . Aviram NoSurprisesPlease 18:02, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Probably not. Why don't you keep reverting vandalism with undo and wait for a couple of months. After such time, ask me again and I'll b happy to grant rollback to you. fr33kman 18:06, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Fr33kman, Thanks for reply again, ok I trying to revert more vandalism and spam also and re-applying for this rollback features after couple of months. Aviram NoSurprisesPlease 18:18, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
I've reconsidered and your use of the undo button is causing you extra time and effort. Therefore, I have granted you rollback. Thanks fr33kman 12:51, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Fr33kman, Hello, I really thankful to you, and also thanks for granting me for rollback , I'm always trying to given postive contributions on simple wiki. but I was maded a request on RfP in past, sorry for about that and thanks a lot for that. Kind regards Aviram NoSurprisesPlease 13:04, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

There's an edit war going on the Zoophilia page change

This is the dumbest thing I've seen. People are edit warring over a pointless fact that Steven Crowder drinks dog semen. The source links back to a Reddit page with an obviously photoshopped Youtube screenshot. 174.71.244.91 (talk) 17:47, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Protected for 1 week Thank you for raising this as an issue. fr33kman 17:53, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism in 1984 change

There's frequent Vandalism in page 1984, the IP looks like an american hater since most of names he's removing are Americans ; So either block that IP, or maybe protect the page...

Faraz Sualeh (talk) 15:38, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

and yeah i forgot to mention, revert his last edit
Faraz Sualeh (talk) 15:53, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Done Thanks for reporting this issue. fr33kman 16:10, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
welcome but can you just revert his last edit in 1984 so names he deleted comes back...
Faraz Sualeh (talk) 16:45, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, please help me to block concerning user User:Korail7409 change

This user was blocked by English Wikipedia admin Secretlondon for he is a ja sockpuutery of Genshin Impact Vandalism users (check-user confirmed),

He is active in Simple English Wikipedia!

You can have a look at this user's Central Auth Infomation [8] if you don't trust me. I know it's hard to believe but we have checked this user and results support it!

I don't have an account so I can't report this user, thank you! 37.235.55.64 (talk) 15:42, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Here is Central Auth Information [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/Korail7409] 37.235.55.64 (talk) 15:44, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
I have blocked the user based on the ONESTRIKE policy and their actions on this project. Thank you for raising this as an issue. fr33kman 15:47, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Fr33kman, Korail7409 recently has been the main target of Genshin LTA. This LTA made so many impersonation accounts or similar user name accounts of Korail7409, this is evident mis-block. This 37.235 is also frequent Genshin LTA IP. LR0725 (talk) 15:54, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I was wondering about the situation. I blocked them due to the enwiki block and not because of the request. fr33kman 15:57, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Did this guy make any "one strike"? WP:ONESTRIKE says user blocked indefinitely can be just blocked in Simple English Wikipedia only by one rule-breaking, but I think Korail7409 did not commit any rule breaking here... LR0725 (talk) 16:00, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
A user blocked on another project can be blocked here with or without the onstrike. I found this edit to be unhelpful and the fact that they were blocked on enwiki for sockpupperty made me decide to block. Is there a specific reason you feel they should not be blocked? I'm willing to review. fr33kman 16:05, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Surely. Korail7409 is jawiki extendedconfirmed user, and attacked by that Genshin LTA for long time. You can see that in many sock accounts' edits in many wikimedia projects. Maybe like history of User talk:Korail7409? Korail7409 is just a LTA victim. LR0725 (talk) 16:11, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
I've unblocked the user. I will keep an eye on the situation. fr33kman 16:12, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Secretlondon is not a Checkuser. There is no need to take seriously a request that is clearly based on a falsehood. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 16:08, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
I know they are not a checkuser. Since the block is being queried I'll undo it but I will keep an eye on the situation. fr33kman 16:11, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
It was behavioural but I have unblocked on en now. Secretlondon (talk) 17:03, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Ok, thank you for letting me know. fr33kman 17:04, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
hello, if you find similar name account again(like Korail7406,7405....), this isn't me without User:Korail7408, Genshin LTA (ja:WP:VIP#原神関連を荒らすプロキシ群) impersonated me using This account yesterday.--Korail7409 (talk) 00:43, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notability (academics) change

Can you provide a measure that could help determine whether an academic is notable, particularly in a non-Anglophone country with a different media ecosystem? I've heard people talk about some index related to how often people cite them. Kk.urban (talk) 17:41, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

It's a case-by-case basis. I've read what enwiki has to say about the subject and I suppose that could be used as a guideline. fr33kman 17:44, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
There is an RfD that you could at least have the decency to comment at since you caused it. :| fr33kman 22:25, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
I will comment on it. Kk.urban (talk) 22:29, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

lock account change

Fr33kman, Hello, This user is globally locked, so please remove rollback rights from this user account.Kind regards Aviram NoSurprisesPlease 01:32, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

(Non-administrator observation) This request was already rejected per Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Current_issues_and_requests_archive_67#Remove_permission. Please also read w:WP:INDEFRIGHTS. MathXplore (talk) 04:39, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
@MathXplore: Hello! Thanks for informing me about that topics.Kind regards Aviram NoSurprisesPlease 05:51, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quick Deletion change

Theres a newly created page named 'იაკობ გოგებაშვილი' Since its written in other language then English it needs to be Quick Deleted, so have a look...

Faraz Sualeh (talk) 17:12, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

You've got mail! change

 
Hello, Fr33kman. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience.
Message added 13:59, 25 October 2023 (UTC). You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

Bobherry Talk My Changes 13:59, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

PGA change

I have addressed your comments on the "Made You Look" nomination at PGA. I was hoping you could revisit and consider supporting.--NØ 22:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Done fr33kman 22:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar for you change

  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for stopping all that vandalism. It is greatly appreciated! SIMPLEIST (talk) 19:40, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks a lot!! :) fr33kman 19:41, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism change

Do your like vandalism???? 2A00:23C7:785:3701:9435:F679:C4BB:BB4F (talk) 19:56, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

No, I think vandals are sociopaths. They can't participate in polite society so they lash out. fr33kman 20:01, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Logan Keith Williams change

The devil does not come so fast when we think about him, as you come fast on the page. :-) Dear @Fr33kman I created Logan Keith Williams page two times. First time you delete it immediately, I could only see QD A4. Second time I created talk page first and mentioned that in my opinion how this subject is notable, you deleted also talk page with page. It is my request, please restore page, talk page and initiate an RfD. If community votes for delete. I myself nominate this for delete. Thanks. J.FlanaG (talk) 21:12, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry but the subject is not notable. You must show why and how the person deserves a page on Wikipedia. I read the page and determined that it was not notable. Sorry if this upsets you, it's not personal. :) fr33kman 21:14, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
After reviewing the page I've decided to undelete it and send it to RfD. You did state why the subject should be considered notable so I'm happy to undelete it. Good luck! :) fr33kman 21:19, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. J.FlanaG (talk) 21:23, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
You're welcome :) fr33kman 21:24, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

RfD nomination of Testing rfd change

An editor has requested deletion of Testing rfd, a page you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2023/Testing rfd and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. fr33kman 07:51, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hey change

Can you please keep this page cause this wasn't marketing or advertising themselves Ejaz Rahman Music (talk) 07:45, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

(talk page stalker) @Ejaz Rahman Music: Please use WP:Deletion review to ask for deleted pages to be restored. Thank you. -- Auntof6 (talk) 08:35, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Fuchs' dystrophy change

Hello, just wanted to let you know that I closed it as a keep.So when you have a little time, can you cross-check for accuracy? - If you add/change something, try keeping the language simple... - Cheers. Eptalon (talk) 20:00, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Just saw you close it. I'll get on it tonight. Thanks! BTW: did you suppress that Imgpflip page? If so I'll recreate the article under proterction. Thx! fr33kman 20:14, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
I think I did; if I didn't send me a mail... Eptalon (talk) 20:32, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, I just checked you did it. Thanks buddy, I'll recreate it as a stub and leave it protected. It had some vile vandalism to go with the oversight stuff. Where people get their ideas from I'll never know! Thanks dude! :) fr33kman 20:42, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

You've got mail! change

 
Hello, Fr33kman. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience.
Message added 22:57, 29 October 2023 (UTC). You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

Auntof6 (talk) 22:57, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Replied directly. Thx fr33kman 23:12, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

QD R2 change

Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Redirects says "Redirects to the User: or User talk: space from the main article space and vice versa." Are you sure about your decision? MathXplore (talk) 05:45, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

No, now that I saw it says "vice versa" I'll delete it. Thanks! fr33kman 06:00, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
I don't see what's wrong with redirecting from userspace to mainspace personally, but ok. fr33kman 06:02, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please block User:柏尾菓子 because she is editing dispiritedly and blocked in en wiki indefinitely! change

Hello, I’d like to report a concerning user User:柏尾菓子. SHE WAS BLOCKED by en admin JBW DUE TO VANDALISM IN GENSHIN AND BAD EDITING! Here is the CA [9] This user is currently blocked. The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

09:17, 2 November 2023 JBW talk contribs blocked 柏尾菓子 talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) (Clearly not here to contribute to building the encyclopaedia)

Please block @柏尾菓子 to prevent abusing, thanks, you can click the link to check the info if you don’t believe what I said! 反對日文維基濫用傀儡的人 (talk) 15:06, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

She is related to some LTA, an en wiki admin JBW confirmed that. 反對日文維基濫用傀儡的人 (talk) 15:08, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
@反對日文維基濫用傀儡的人: She hasn't done anything here though? RiggedMint 18:20, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
(Non-administrator observation) I recommend ignoring this request. The user who made the request is globally locked. User:柏尾菓子 is an admin and bureaucrat on Japanese Wikipedia and their block on enwiki seems to be a mistake. Their only edits on enwiki were to tell others to stop discussing Japanese Wikipedia business on enwiki. Kk.urban (talk) 18:25, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Acknowledged :) fr33kman 18:27, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Edit conflict change

Im sitting here trying to make my point when a wild template appears... confused the hell out of me, I tell you. Pure Evil (talk) 07:37, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, edit conflicts suck :) fr33kman 07:39, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
2 added points: the RfD say Apache Wave was QD'd as A7. A3, maybe? there is no A7 after all. (the other was a3 or G7, I said A7 by mistake.. my bad) And you never actually deleted the page. Pure Evil (talk) 07:50, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Because it was "cleaned up" from the copy-paste mess it was. It's now down to cleanup, sigh fr33kman 08:29, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
You still havent actually deleted the page after closing the RfD as QD. Pure Evil (talk) 06:27, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, now done; thx fr33kman 21:59, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

A Question change

Hey bro, why is it that Wikipedia has its own logo and it can't be used here? Also I have tried to copy a few image from Arabic Wikipedia to here but it doesn't work either? What's the matter?--Faraz Sualeh (talk) 11:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Each version of Wikipedia chooses their own logo. The Simple English Wikipedia has chosen the one you see and has had it for almost 17 years. We like it. You are free to start another discussion on WP:ST to see if people want to update it, but we'll likely keep it. Hope this helps! fr33kman 12:28, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Also, the simplewiki does not allow the local upload of images. All images must go on commons. fr33kman 12:29, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hey i was not asking about the official Wikipedia logos, i was asking about local article related logos such as Logo of Abu Ali Mustafa Brigades that's available on En wiki which you can see here; but it can't be uploaded here, though, i learned about it from your second answer. Thanks Faraz Sualeh (talk) 15:40, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
About once a year, I ask the community whether or not we want to allow the local uploading of images here. So far it's a 3-0 lose. I can ask again shortly. Best I can do. If you can see a picture on the Arabic wikipedia but can't use it here, it is because it must be uploaded locally on the Arabic wikipedia and not on commons. fr33kman 17:50, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
The main reason you can only see your logo on arwiki is that nether commons nor simplewiki allows the use of copyrighted images (ie: non-free images). fr33kman 17:59, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Oh, Thanks for explanation, i got it👍🏻 Faraz Sualeh (talk) 18:54, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks change

Regarding a title that included "Shuafat".--Thanks for swiftly having removed it from main space. 2001:2020:319:E5B1:D59:42EA:FFE5:144F (talk) 19:59, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome fr33kman 20:00, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2023/Syed Hassan Jafari (Actor) change

This is showing as closed as Delete, but the article doesn't appear to have been deleted. Would you mind taking a look? Thank ya! Ravensfire (talk) 03:04, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Oops, my bad. Thanks for nudging me. :) fr33kman 03:13, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
I've never, ever, ever done something like that... Appreciate it, it's stuff from a rather obnoxious self-promotional sock farm that's on EN and here. Gems like Special:Contributions/Mirali222 who tags another account as being one of their socks. (See the global accounts - they're CU blocked on EN). Ravensfire (talk) 03:18, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Pinwheel Twist change

Hi, I'd flagged that one as "some or all" being untrue as it was apparently created by a sock of en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Oatsandcream. They've created the same page on enwiki in the past and it's been deleted.

Fair enough if you've checked it out, but this user has also been misrepresenting sources at the Humor Risk article here. They seem to enjoy embellishing stories about lost media. Belbury (talk) 15:09, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your post. Yes, in this instance, the page is true and notable. I will keep an eye out for others. Cheers! :) fr33kman 16:50, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Reintegrating simple English change

Hello. I would like to undergo an unblocking process on simple English. I will not specify my identity right away. All I will say is that you are the user who undertook my blocking, and before I start, I would like to have your consent. Cheers! Oh you guessed it (talk) 18:33, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

If you have access to your talkpage then you can ask for an unblock there. Showing up here with a sockpuppet doesn't look good btw. fr33kman 18:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yeah.. I guess. I dont Remember my old password, And there are a bunch of other problems too. I‘ve created a new account, and I want to integrate using it. Oh you guessed it (talk) 18:41, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Then just start editing with the account you have now. If you want to reveal your past account you can but it may end up with you being blocked straight away depending on which account it was. You can email me the name if you wish but I can't promise it still wouldn't be blocked. If you are after a fresh start just keep the current account and start editing. fr33kman 18:48, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Stephen Ridley change

You closed Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2023/Stephen Ridley as delete, so can you delete the article and the associated talk page please? Kk.urban (talk) 04:53, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I thought I had done so. Thanks for reminding me. fr33kman 19:32, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi, you deleted the redirect under G6, but I disagree with that. Do you mind restoring the page for a full deletion discussion to take place? Thank you. — *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 09:23, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

done fr33kman 18:31, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

RG Qluck Wise change

Hi there @Fr33kman I really don’t understand what you mean by the page I created does not claim notability. If I may ask what makes this page non notable? After been retrieving sources from Google news and you still says this page doesn’t meet notability. I really don’t get you. Please if you want somethings to be changed just undelete it so I can change it thanks. Gudwise (talk) 02:57, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your page does not show what the person has done to be considered as notable (famous) enough to have an article here. What major national/international awards have they been awarded. How many citations in major newspapers, magazines do they have etc. Please read WP:GNG for more information. fr33kman 03:24, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
So do you mean News Ghana[10] is not a reliable/independent source ? Do you mean MENAFN is not a reliable/independent source and what about GhanaWeb[11] too?
He is a up and coming record producer.
so why don’t you consider? Gudwise (talk) 03:43, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
I actually did quite a bit more research on this one than normal. I can't find reliable sources. Those are sources that are available on the Internet, are cited in other reliable sources like other websites (who are themselves RS) and well-known national or international newspapers, journals and magazine. Being mentioned on the national or international news helps establish RS and N. CNN, Al-Jazeera, The Times of India etc., are all reliable sources as long as the subject is the main topic of the piece and not just mentioned as a 2 second side-line. I am, at the moment, researching a page that would list the major RS of India, Pakistan and South-East Asia asI don't think we have good enough coverage for this area of the world. fr33kman 13:55, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

bad link... change

Hello, On a certain article talkpage, there is a possible bad link. I am not sure what to do as I don't want to blank another user's comment. Tsugaru let's talk! :) 03:30, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Can you give me more details please? fr33kman 19:41, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Rollback change

Please grant me rollback rights so that I can remove the vandalism. And my interest is in removing vandalism. →MP1999 (talk) 15:44, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

You only have 42 edits on this project and have only been active since 04/12/2023. Keep editing and work on reverting vandalism and I'll be happy to grant rollback after a month of activity. Welcome to the Simple English Wikipedia and Happy Editing! :) fr33kman 19:40, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Welcome back from oblivion change

The man disappears for the better part from a decade, and just reappears out of no where. And yet, no text, no email. Nothing. I feel disrespected. lol jk. But seriously though. We need to catch up old friend. Either add me on facebook, X, or email me and let’s catch up, bro. TrueCRaysball | #RaysUp 03:09, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

I was told you left .... How's it going Aaron? Good to see you still around! :) fr33kman 03:30, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Honestly, I did retire from simple. I only knew you were back because Gordonrox24 (talk · contribs) told me. TrueCRaysball | #RaysUp 19:02, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Well now you can come back :) fr33kman 19:36, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

70.77.249.86 change

Hey man! Can you revoke the IP's TPA? Thanks Tsugaru let's talk! :) 02:07, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Declined QDs change

Hi, I do know I tend to be more strict on these than many editors, but I thought the recent ones were pretty clear cut. For example, in María Josepha Sophia de Iturbide, every sentence is an exact word-for-word copy paste from EnWP. Not a word was changed. They editor just copied sentences and left others out. Short is not simpler, right? No attribution. What they didn't copy was references, making the article worse than the En version. Would you reconsider the QDs? Or, should I take them to RfD? I'd prefer not to clog up the Discussed Deletion queue any more than it is. Thanks, --Gotanda (talk) 23:44, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

When I reviewed them I thought that your reasoning was that they were an exact word-for-word copy of a copy of sentences. Then I saw that they had been changed a little and felt that perhaps your thinking was that there was no attribution. Copyright law permits an exact word-for-word copy without attribution of one or two sentences without falling foul of the law. I added the attribution and declined the QDs. Since you've explained what your thinking was more clearly I am happy to delete them. FYI, When I see articles created like these were, where fixing them would be quick and easy, I prefer to just quickly fix them them rather than delete them but I support your right to ask for a QD instead. Cheers! :) fr33kman 01:17, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for all of your admin mopping up! -- Gotanda (talk) 06:49, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
No problems, now if I could just figure out how to add my second stint as a CU to the checkuser chart I'd be good. :) fr33kman 06:53, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Talkback change

 
Hello, Fr33kman. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser.
Message added 03:30, 14 December 2023 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

MathXplore (talk) 03:30, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

User:Cyber.Eyes.2005 change

Hello @Fr33kman i am writing this message for a checkuser Request against @Cyber.Eyes.2005 i have created a article today Pradeep Kumaar Yadav and this editor placed a QD template with a reason of blocked user this is not fare. and then a check his account and i found that he is already blocked in English Wikipedia due to horrible Sock Puppetry [[12]] i want your help sir please help me you dont think so why any editor edits pages continuously 10-12 hours daily. i think he is doing all this for Wikipedia Rights of Rollback please consider my request i beg to you. 203.115.91.125 (talk) 18:27, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

You are correct, they are a sockpuppet. Hope this helps you now. fr33kman 20:44, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank You sir it will really helpful but sir @Cyber.Eyes.2005 Still unblocked. i am sure these are socks of @Cyber.Eyes.2005 because after his/her edits suddenly actives and revert all my changes that i have done against him. think about this matter why any random person will arrive and reverts all changes that i have done against him. and with his past records its clear that he may be using multiple accounts also this time again. because in English Wikipedia he is blocked because of horrible sock puppetry. 203.115.91.125 (talk) 20:53, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
CyberEyes.2005 is blocked. I blocked hem myself few minutes ago. fr33kman 20:55, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
yes i have seen now. and thank you respected editor 203.115.91.125 (talk) 21:01, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. :) fr33kman 22:01, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. :) fr33kman 01:59, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Talkback change

 
Hello, Fr33kman. You have new messages at Cyber.Eyes.2005's talk page.
Message added 02:43, 18 December 2023 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

MathXplore (talk) 02:43, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

User:Dotdashmeredith change

Hello Respected editor @Fr33kman i am here to bring your attention on @Dotdashmeredith I think he is doing sock puppetry on Simple English Wikipedia. I have seen he is Doing disruptive edits here and placing Random deletation tags on articles. He Creates a article Poybo Media which is created by a Sock on English Wikipedia [13] he is also Blocked on Wikidata [14] and Cr.wikipedia.org [15] . I Dont think he is here for a good reason. After reviewing his Editing style i am conformed he is here for recreating the deleted and blocked article from English Wikipedia. please Check this User and revert his all bad changes from Wikipedia, i tried to reverts his changes but he always doing Undo so i request you to see this matter Thanks in advance Simonsmichel (talk) 07:26, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

You are clearly targeting my work, and are sockpuppeting with multiple accounts to delete my QD nominations. I have already dealt with my past sockpuppeting with the administrators, and we have resolved that I will only use this account to make constructive edits. dotdashmeredith (talk) 07:28, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
For convenience to Fr33kman:
  • I marked a number of articles for QD that I strongly believe do not meet notability.
  • A brand new user, under an IP came and reverted all my QD nominations without reason. I warned them on their talk page, but they did not stop. Then they QD nominated articles I created without reason.
  • The IP user stopped, and then a new Simonsmichel began repeating the same. Simonsmichel faked a global rollbacker role, likely to appear more authentic. This succession is evident of a sockpuppet.
  • Simonsmichel began threatening on multiple Wikipedia threads.
Fr33kman, just take a glance at the articles I nominated for deletion. They clearly make sense.
This user should also be banned for sockpuppetry, vandalism. dotdashmeredith (talk) 07:34, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
You are using multiple accounts on simplewiki for sockpuppetry. I have blocked them all. fr33kman 16:37, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

What A Miracle change

Hello @Fr33kman i have seen all the discussions and i think these are are playing game in Simple English Wikipedia after unblocking @Cyber.Eyes.2005. immediately user @Dotdashmeredith asking for unblock and along with this another account @OhDear2 brand new account raised voice against you for Requests for de-checkusership/Fr33kman this is not a coincidence. if i am not wrong these accounts are connected to each other. and planning something big on Simple English Wikipedia. Their edit style is also Similar to each other and they are also blocked on English Wikipedia for the same reason because of Sock Puppetry. May be they are using different IP or they are opperating form different locations. Simonsmichel (talk) 18:49, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Are you sure they're related? RiggedMint 18:53, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Because you are targeting specific people (mostly people who have been blocked on enwiki for socking)... Seems like you are attacking them? RiggedMint 18:55, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
no sir i am not targeting them i am not very much experienced like you and other senior editors. i just compare their editing style, way of editing and supporting each other and Recreating same article which is already deleted because of Sock Puppetry and now when @Fr33kman unblocked @Cyber.Eyes.2005 after few minuets @Dotdashmeredith came and request for unblock. and a brand new account Requests for de-checkusership/Fr33kman raised voice against him. is this normal according to you @RiggedMint sir. Simonsmichel (talk) 19:01, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
It seems pretty normal because both were blocked pretty much at the same time, They don't have the same IP, they even have different CU cases back in enwiki. RiggedMint 19:09, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
I am not related to any one of those users mentioned. @Simonsmichel is a sockpuppet, after their VPN IP reverted my QD nominatinos without reason, Simonsmichel began to do the same (faking their global rollback role). The articles I nominated do not meet QD. Then Simonsmichel began to threaten me, and reported me on multiple Wikipedia threads for no reason. dotdashmeredith (talk) 19:31, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Both of the users who nominated me and @Cyber.Eyes.2005 were brand new users/IPs who have made no other contributions. Their first move was nominating us, this is definitely some targeted attack. dotdashmeredith (talk) 19:32, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
I've blocked Simonsmichel. Sorry about this. Vermont (🐿️🏳️‍🌈) 21:07, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
I knew it all along :| fr33kman 22:08, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Fr33kman, would you mind a quick CU check on Simonmichel to see if they are a Amansharma111 sock. Their Simanchal Panda page has all of the hallmarks of an A111 article - over-the-top promotional tone, lots of unsourced awards, junk "world record" from pay-for-play award groups. I think there's a fair number of sleepers out there, unfortunately, as they like to do a new account every other article or so. I'd be glad to put all of this in the RFCU entry if you'd prefer. Ravensfire (talk) 19:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Vermont and Fr33kman, these guys were really annoying! dotdashmeredith (talk) 02:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Bangkok Post change

The article Bangkok Post, has been deleted.--Not sure who started the article, but I simplified it.--If you or anyone else can take a second look at that very short article, or stub, then fine.--Please consider having it republished, as it was at the point when the name of the sports editor was removed from the infobox.--By the way, I did not Q.C. the full address in the infobox. Thanks, ~~~~ 2001:2020:347:C043:B5A3:7C88:31C5:75D7 (talk) 18:49, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Fr33kman the article Bangkok Post which is already deleted was created by @Dotdashmeredith (blocked user) now he is writing with a random Internet Protocol for retrieve the article strange. Now i confirmed that these users are interconnected to each other. Simonsmichel (talk) 18:54, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
I did not ever use an IP. dotdashmeredith (talk) 19:34, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Start the article from scratch. fr33kman 18:54, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, but I am gonna pass on that "offer". 2001:2020:30D:F1E8:E8D2:487A:E522:D45A (talk) 19:57, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
FYI, I created a stub... Eptalon (talk) 21:21, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Need Your Help Sir change

Respected Editor @Fr33kmanOperator873 i am forced to text you here a user a user in Simple English Wikipedia doing mass Quick Delete tags on Indian Wikipedia Articles frequently @‎Dotdashmeredith [16] here i mentioned his username i have raised voice against him but no once cares about this user @Dotdashmeredith already blocked on English Wikipedia because on Sock Puppetry [17] also blocked on cr.wikipedia.org [18] and Also blocked on Wikidata [19] and now doing mass delete on Simple English Wikipedia [20]. He is also Doing Paid edits according to me, He creates Poybo Media on Simple English Wikipedia and this article is also creates on English Wikipedia but now article is deleted on English Wikipedia Because of Sock Puppetry. You can check the references [21] And He tried to create Same article on Every Wikipedia [22] Justin Jin [23] . Two Articles Justin Jin and Poybo Media he tried to create every time. i beg to you thats why i am messaging you on Meta-Wikipedia because no one hereing me on Simple English Wikipedia. i am trusting you and respect you thats why i am here in your talk page please do the needful. Bathew Mads Fomo (talk) 23:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

“Respected editor”, here “Deletetion” there, Clear sock puppet. dotdashmeredith (talk) 23:30, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Blocked :-) Vermont (🐿️🏳️‍🌈) 23:34, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

You've got mail change

 
Hello, Fr33kman. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience.
You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

— JJMC89(T·C) 06:19, 20 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

I see that you have been active without responding to the Commission. Do you intend to respond? If you do not respond promptly, the Commission will decide the case against you without your input. — JJMC89(T·C) 16:51, 28 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Happy holidays change

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Thanks! You too :) fr33kman 08:06, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Merry Christmas change

  Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024!

Hello Fr33kman, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024.
Happy editing,

Davey2010Talk 15:26, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Thanks, you too :) fr33kman 08:06, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

You've got mail! change

 
Hello, Fr33kman. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience.
Message added 03:39, 26 December 2023 (UTC). You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

It's not urgent :) Tsugaru let's talk! :) 03:39, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

From EN Wiki change

Hi Fr33kman. Hope you are doing well. I am from EN wiki [24]. This message is regarding the User:SaneFlint who is blocked for abusivly using multiple accounts(socking) in EN wiki, here is the link to the Sockpuppet investigation. SaneFlint has created the article Pir Ihsanullah Shah Rashdi on EN Wiki, which is currently in the AfD: [25].
I'd like to clarify that User:SaneFlint assumed User:Rathura Jemican was me here on Simple Wiki: [26], even though I don't have any other accounts. This is my first edit on Simple Wiki. You can check my global contributions, I am a new page reviewer in En wiki and have been only editing there majorly.
After SaneFlint's ban on EN Wiki, they seem to have shifted here to create similar articles that were deleted on the EN wiki. I discovered their activity here while checking where this image was being used.
Feel free to disregard this message if Simple Wiki policies differ from those on EN Wiki or if SaneFlint hasn't violated any guidelines here. Cheers. Jeraxmoira (talk) 18:52, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Closing RfDs change

I think you forgot to remove the RfD tag from List of poets from North America. Kk.urban (talk) 06:05, 28 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! I don't know why I keep doing that. fr33kman 06:08, 28 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

J Merlin change

Hi @Fr33kman i noticed that you deleted the page J Merlin. I think this artist has the potential to be notable. I always come across something new about this artist including information from news. He is verified on social media, music platforms and has a knowledge panel. Is there any possibility you can reconsider J Merlin? Maybe you can the deletion of the page and I will gather extra information that you think is required Christoffheaney (talk) 02:03, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

You'll have to take it to deletion review. fr33kman 11:26, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I can’t find it in the deletion review Christoffheaney (talk) 14:47, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
(talk page stalker) To restore an article, you need to request undeletion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. – Cyber.Eyes2005Talk 14:56, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I tried to however i couldn’t see any information to start a topic so I went on the Wikipedia:DRV talk page to start one as it’s a redirect. Christoffheaney (talk) 15:28, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Your request has been moved to Wikipedia:Deletion review by ‎Ferien. Best, – Cyber.Eyes2005Talk 15:56, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi i replied to your message on the deletion review however there was no reply. It was regarding adding extra information to the page Christoffheaney (talk) 19:42, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

your recent block change

Hey, hope your new year is going well so far. Currently on flood so don't want to be adjusting any blocks that might not be seen in RC. Do you think it would be a good idea to have a {{UsernameBlocked}} for Amazemedia? (Amazemedia sounds a bit like a company name) --Ferien (talk) 17:58, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sure, will do. fr33kman 18:00, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Talkback change

 
Hello, Fr33kman. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser.
Message added 06:07, 4 January 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

MathXplore (talk) 06:07, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks change

Palace of Fine Arts. 2001:2020:347:A242:8C5F:CDC9:18C:1CCB (talk) 20:10, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

You've got mail! change

 
Hello, Fr33kman. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience.
Message added 13:02, 6 January 2024 (UTC). You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

*Fehufangą✉ Talk page 13:02, 6 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Replied fr33kman 13:33, 6 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please reopen this RfD. It had not been open for a week yet, so hadn't got the chance to get all the potential comments, but even if it had been, RfDs with no comments are treated as WP:SOFTDELETEs. --Ferien (talk) 20:23, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done,deleted fr33kman 19:13, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Talkback change

 
Hello, Fr33kman. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser.
Message added 20:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cyber.Eyes2005Talk 20:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Dotdashcomma change

Hi! I noticed your block of them was only for a week. They've been globally locked (not by me) at this point, having continued their cross-wiki socking (namely with Tester85) and spam after multiple agreements not to. There's basically no chance they get unblocked, and I'm wondering if you'd be okay if we change the local block to indefinite for procedural purposes. I.e., if they appeal in the future we can treat Dotdashcomma as the "master" and they'd appeal that account's block, as opposed to the block of one of the many socks. Best, Vermont (🐿️🏳️‍🌈) 03:11, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sure, I've no issues with that. fr33kman 05:17, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

question) change

hey admin :)

I have a real quick question.

there was a guy who sent me some abusive messages couple days ago, his name was User:Xegma11|Xegma11]]

I'm not sure If this person is relates to User:Xegma as well? just curious. SaneFlint (talk) 17:03, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

No, they appear to be completely unrelated. fr33kman 17:33, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
thanks for letting me know) SaneFlint (talk) 17:53, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
In the future can you make such requests on theWP:RFCU page for transparency? Thanks :) fr33kman 17:55, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I wasn't sure that's why I asked here
I will do that next time , appreciate it :) SaneFlint (talk) 18:26, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, you deleted Hacktivist Vanguard under G4, however G4 only applies if [the article] includes an identical or similar copy, with any title, of a page that was deleted. The version that was first discussed ([27], Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2023/Hacktivist Vanguard) is very different from the new version [28]. It would be best to let the RfD resume so we can get a new G4 in the future. Could you undelete the article? Thank you. — *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 08:54, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

asking about recent article creation change

Hi :) I noticed my recent newly created article was deleted as I was working on it. Subject is very much notable and I was working on it maybe you can undelete it? I will add resources it will be easier to confirm its notability. Subject was part of Sindh Khilafat Movement and Reshi Rumal Tehrik known as Silk Letter Conspiracy ): SaneFlint (talk) 18:54, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

My advice to you (like it is to everyone) is make it easier on the admins by firstly not publishing an article until it is in a fit state to be on the project by making sure it is at least 50%-75% finished and has a) reliable sources and b) makes an actual claim of notability. This means telling us WHY he subject deserves a page in an encyclopedia. I've created lots of articles myself and have never had one deleted because I follow this advice and don't press "Publish" until it is finished or almost finished. I will undelete this article for you but I expect to see a claim of notability and some citations from reliable secondary or tertiary sources TODAY. Thx, :) fr33kman 20:06, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Perfect I will do that next time :)
appreciate it😇 SaneFlint (talk) 20:10, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

emails from our "friend" change

Hi Fr33kman - you may have received one or more email messages from the deranged stalker that has afflicted this and other projects for many years. (The account I just reported at Meta, spoofing your name, had email enabled; whenever that is the case, he's sending threats.) I encourage you to forward anything you get to Wikimedia Legal. We're working on something to put a permanent end to this. Thanks - Antandrus (talk) 00:55, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Will do. Thx fr33kman 00:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Temporary Page Protection Request change

The article Martin Luther King Jr. has been recently vandalized from numerous unregistered IP addresses. The article should temporarily be protected to prevent vandalism. 84Swagahh (talk) 19:47, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

¿Question? change

Why did you delete the article if you knew that there was a discussion about its permanence on Wikipedia? In addition, you deleted sources. I ask that you restore it again. Your action is arbitrary. https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletion/Requests/2024/Dhruv_Sharma 190.219.223.166 (talk) 21:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

It did not make a claim of notability so was detectable under QDA4. fr33kman 21:13, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
friend there is a request where it is disputed whether the article is kept or deleted where others give their opinion you simply deleted it, without consensus I ask that you restore it until I finished the debate you are violating the policy https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletion/Requests/2024/Dhruv_Sharma 190.219.223.166 (talk) 21:16, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I have restored it. I did not violate policy, as an admin I can decide to use quick deletion if it fits. I decided it was deletable under QDA4. fr33kman 21:20, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
You cannot eliminate articles if they have sources, you must wait and work for the good of articles like this one has References and is notable 190.219.223.166 (talk) 22:23, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sure I can. There needs to be an assertion of notability first. fr33kman 18:16, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Why you're deleting articles? change

huhhhh? 110.54.213.49 (talk) 23:37, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

It's my job fr33kman 15:26, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

question again:) change

how do I make a category page?) SaneFlint (talk) 18:07, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

@SaneFlint The same way you make any page. "Category:New Page". 82.132.229.109 (talk) 18:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
You use Category:PageName in the search box and then press publish. You then add the cat name to pages you want to add to the cat. Hope this helps, if not ask Rathfelder :) fr33kman 18:24, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks again :) let me try SaneFlint (talk) 18:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Buena Vista, Virginia change

Hi, why did you revert my edit on Buena Vista, Virginia? Kk.urban (talk) 18:41, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Did I? Must have been a mistake. I'm using my phone. Sorry! :) fr33kman 18:44, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ok, thanks for your response. Kk.urban (talk) 18:45, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Rollback change

Dear Fr33kman, Can you grant Rollback rights on my alternative account because I have already rollback right on enwiki, Sometimes I edit from our alternate account to revert vandalism, If you feel confortable, so, please grant me this permission:) Kind regards~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 09:21, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Looks like it's already been done. fr33kman 20:49, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Dear Fr33kman, Thanku for reply, I known you granted already rollbacker rights on my main account but I say can you add rollback flag on alternate account ;please see here; if you adding rollback flag on my alternate account, so, I'll feel very happy :) Kind regards~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 03:00, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Dear Fr33kman, Thank you for adding rollback flag on my alternative account. 😊Kind regards~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 18:07, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
You're welcome fr33kman 18:09, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for being a medical contributors! change

  The 2023 Cure Award
In 2023 you were one of the top medical editors in your language. Thank you from Wiki Project Med for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do!

Wiki Project Med Foundation is a thematic organization whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining for 2024, there are no associated costs.

Additionally one of our primary efforts revolves around translation of health content. We invite you to try our new workflow if you have not already. Our dashboard automatically collects statistics of your efforts and we are working on tools to automatically improve formating.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 22:24, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Cancelled Video Game Cross-wiki vandal change

An IP vandal listed in VIP is repeatedly vandalizing Category:Cancelled video games and Category:Cancelled Nintendo GameCube games and their linked articles. Can you block their IPs? There's 2 of them. Derpdart56 (talk) 19:20, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Skibidi toilet change

Can you salt this one too please? Skibidi toilet Thanks - Da LambTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 16:06, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Skibidi Toilet change

Please restore this article. Your reason for deletion on the last one was already invalid, as no RfD had occurred, but deleting it again with no reason once it had already been restored – either not reading the history or choosing to ignore other admins' actions – is worse. --Ferien (talk) 21:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm not the first to delete it. It was deleted multiple times already. fr33kman 21:44, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
That wasn't really the issue - it was deleted numerous times for other issues, and you chose to delete it twice despite it having reasonable content in these latest revisions. Nevertheless, I appreciate you restoring it. --Ferien (talk) 22:43, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Page deletion change

Hey! I saw that earlier you deleted Jebel Sahaba as an A4. It was recreated by the same user again. Just wanted to make you aware. En wiki also has this article so I’m not quite sure why you deleted the first version. Thanks - Da LambTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 10:32, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Salt please change

Can you please semi-protect Zumrud Mirzaeva as it keeps getting created. Thanks. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 22:18, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

(talk page stalker) @PotsdamLamb: This has been done. However, would you please make requests like this on the admins' noticeboard instead of on individual admins' talk pages? -- Auntof6 (talk) 01:16, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Auntof6 It was requested 3x by another user. I posted it here because this editor deleted the page. There are quite a lot of requests on WP:AN in which page protection has been requested and no admin has taken action. Again, please look at things before you post. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 03:54, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
@PotsdamLamb: If you think requests on the admins' noticeboard aren't getting action, consider that fewer admins will see a request on a talk page so it might be even less likely to get action. There may be a reason no action is taken on requests -- you can always ask. -- Auntof6 (talk) 05:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Mortoza Polash change

I'd appreciate it if you could refrain from deleting articles when other admins have already declined QDs, as you have done on Mortoza Polash just now and at #Skibidi Toilet and #Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Hacktivist Vanguard above. As an admin, you are supposed to be checking the history before deleting the article. This is not optional and is mentioned specifically in the QD template. This has already been mentioned to you multiple times on this talk page alone but despite this, it seems you still are either not checking the history or purposefully overriding other admins' actions without explanation – neither is acceptable. I'm going to assume good faith that you just aren't checking the history, but if that is the case, you should be reviewing QD requests closer in future. --Ferien (talk) 17:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Understood, sorry fr33kman 18:51, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Laxman Shende change

Why deleted this page ? Added Source and more information please check. Admin Laxman Shende is a Indian Maharashtra Student consolor motivational speaker Contactsaurabhtamhane (talk) 17:48, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

It didn't meet our criteria for inclusion. fr33kman 17:58, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Laxman Shende is a Indian motivational speaker, corporate trainer, entrepreneur, All Source added but why deleted page sir ? Laxman Shende is a Famouse man in Maharashtra 2405:201:25:8A54:F165:694F:B252:605B (talk) 05:39, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
(talk page stalker) IP editor - the question was already asked and answered. We have very strict criteria to include someone on Wikipedia. We are not a fan site or a database that holds everyone and everything. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 06:05, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion change

You may have to become an interface admin, but can you also delete User:PotsdamLamb/redwarnRules.json please? I cannot tag it since it's a json file. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 21:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done fr33kman 21:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much! Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 21:58, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Anytime fr33kman 00:04, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Dracaena cinnabari‎ change

I take it you forgot to delete Talk:Dracaena cinnabari‎ when you deleted Dracaena cinnabari‎.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 09:04, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

IP editor in recent changes change

Hi, there's an IP editor spamming bad QDs, can you help out here? Derpdart56 (talk) 16:11, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Requesting admin to moderate/ deal with the vandalism problem with the Simple Wikipedia Generation articles change

Hello there. I suggest that the Simple English Wikipedia articles for Generation X, Millennial, Generation Z, and Generation Alpha follow the same guidelines as those from the main English site. Admins there have concluded with only allowing official government citations and certain key institutions such as Pew Research to filter out disruptive editing and vandalism, and to provide a factual reading experience. Much of the edits in these Simple Wikipedia articles have dubious citations, with bad-faith statements (examples include edits stating that Pew ends Gen X at 1979; both citations in the Generation Alpha page state 2013 as the start date, yet editors falsely edit the sentence to state 2012; and the false statement that there are many governmental sources that have 1996-2011 as the Gen Z date range, when this isn't the case). There are multiple citations that come from irrelevant sources (which will allow editors to put any date range they choose,  thus pointing out the bias problem). I have already made edits to remove these, but I believe that it is important to inform to you about this and to allow you to make the decision. I assert that Simple Wikipedia should follow the same guidelines as the main site in order to avoid it becoming chaotic pop-culture articles with bias/disruptive editing and to rid of these editing wars. 2601:940:C180:3DB0:7D8E:995E:B869:AE05 (talk) 02:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

PTED change

Do you have suggestions how to make this Simple English?

"It is defined as a pathological reaction to a [ traumatic or] negative (event or) life event; That event is felt (or was experienced) as a [serious or] grave insult, humiliation, betrayal, or injustice. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]". 2001:2020:347:BE1A:ED6D:126E:6F4A:FEB6 (talk) 02:56, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sources change

  1. Linden, M. (2003). "Posttraumatic embitterment disorder". Psychother Psychosom. 72 (4): 195–202. doi:10.1159/000070783. PMID 12792124. S2CID 19723598.
  2. Linden, Michael (2017). Verbitterung und Posttraumatische Verbitterungsstörung. Hogrefe Verlag (1. Auflage ed.). Göttingen. ISBN 978-3-8017-2822-9. OCLC 971201601.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)Template:Pn
  3. Linden, Michael; Rotter, Max; Lieberei, Barbara; Baumann, Kai (2007). Posttraumatic Embitterment Disorder: Definition, Evidence, Diagnosis, Treatment. MA. ISBN 978-0-88937-344-0.Template:Pn
  4. Linden, M.; Maercker, A. "Embitterment. Societal, psychological, and clinical perspectives". Springer. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  5. Linden, M.; Baumann, K.; Lieberei, B.; Lorenz, C.; Rotter, M. (2011). "Treatment of posttraumatic embitterment disorder with cognitive behaviour therapy based on wisdom psychology and hedonia strategies". Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics. 80 (4): 199–205. doi:10.1159/000321580. PMID 21494061. S2CID 24773913.
  6. Linden, M.; Rutkowsky, K. (2013-01-29). Hurting memories and beneficial forgetting. Posttraumatic stress disorders, biographical developments, and social conflicts. Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-12-398393-0.
  7. Znoj, H.J.; Abegglen, S.; Buchkremer, U.; Linden, M. "The embittered mind: Dimensions of embitterment and validation of the concept". Journal of Individual Differences. 37 (4): 213–222. doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000208.
  8. Sartorius, Norman (2011). "Should embitterment be included among mental disorders?". Embitterment. pp. 248–254. doi:10.1007/978-3-211-99741-3_21. ISBN 978-3-211-99740-6.

2001:2020:347:BE1A:ED6D:126E:6F4A:FEB6 (talk) 02:56, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

New bharat change

Why was Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/New bharat deleted? Can you please undelete this discussion page? Kk.urban (talk) 20:38, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

I deleted it because it was requested under QD fr33kman 21:39, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
The author requested it fr33kman 21:42, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sarah change

I disagree on your deletion. I'm recreating. With sources BigKrow (talk) 17:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

I am not sure what or who you are talking about? I delete over 50 pages a day, I don't remember the name of them all. Please explain. Thx fr33kman 18:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Hegazi BigKrow (talk) 18:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Quick deletion requests change

Were you testing something when you deleted this category? In any case, I've restored it. -- Auntof6 (talk) 10:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

I don't recall deleting it. / fr33kman 18:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC)fr33kman 18:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:LGBT people by variation change

I moved Category:LGBT people by variation and Category:LGBT variations, and you deleted them. I don't know if there's a bot that automatically replaces the category in the subcategories or if we should use c:Cat-a-lot to do that. Can you restore them again? Thanks. MikutoH (talk) 22:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

@MikutoH FYI, there is a bot, RussBot. It logs its actions at User:RussBot/category redirect log. It seems to usually run twice a month, so it hadn't moved the pages to the new category title yet. (I agree that Category:LGBT people by identity and Category:LGBT identities should be restored.) Kk.urban (talk) 22:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Auntof6 Please refer to this discussion. These two categories were moved (and later deleted), but the contents were not yet moved. Kk.urban (talk) 23:43, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Kk.urban: Yes, I saw that the contents hadn't been moved/recategorized, so I was taking care of that. Did I cause a problem? -- Auntof6 (talk) 23:45, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Auntof6: When MikutoH moved Category:LGBT people by variation and Category:LGBT variations to Category:LGBT people by identity and Category:LGBT identities, they meant for the contents to be moved to the new category titles. However, the bot hadn't moved them yet, so the new categories were empty, and Fr33kman deleted them as empty categories. They were not supposed to be empty, they just hadn't been populated yet. Kk.urban (talk) 23:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Kk.urban: OK. So would you like me to restore the identity categories and populate them from the variation categories? -- Auntof6 (talk) 23:51, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Auntof6 I think so, because that's what was intended. Kk.urban (talk) 23:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Kk.urban: OK, I'll do that now. Stand by. -- Auntof6 (talk) 23:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Kk.urban: I think it's right now. Let me know if I need to do anything else. Sorry for the trouble. -- Auntof6 (talk) 00:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! Kk.urban (talk) 00:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Delete change

Can you go to their subpages and delete everything as they have a lot of broken templates and info boxes and such there? Thanks, and be well! - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 19:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sure but it won't be quick, I'm using a phone. Keep nudging me if I miss stuff fr33kman 19:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
No worries. I appreciate it.
 
Hello, Fr33kman. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience.
You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.
Thanks, and be well! - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 19:54, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
You weren’t kidding. 30 min in and I only tagged 1/4 of them. I tagged as G6 and referenced this conversation. I’ll resume tagging when some are cleared out. Need to also see what is under their sock account. Thanks, and be well! - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 08:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Auntof6 This is the conversation I referred to for all of those you just declined. A lot of them have templates and cats on them that are polluting the wanted categories. Thanks, and be well! - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 08:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@PotsdamLamb: Yes, I understand that this is that conversation. I also understand that it's frustrating to have an indeffed user's pages in maintenance categories. However, we can live with that while we do the proper procedures. -- Auntof6 (talk) 08:39, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
(talk page stalker) We do not have a practice of deleting a user's pages just because they are indeffed. I suggest either going to RFD or just blanking the pages. -- Auntof6 (talk) 08:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Auntof6 See my reply above please. Thanks, and be well! - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 08:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
There is really no difference between blanking or deleting them. Blanking them will allow them to come back and re-pollute everything especially with the malformed templates they were making and I’m still fixing some of them they brought over incorrectly and messed up. Thanks, and be well! - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 08:39, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Auntof6 RfD doesn’t work because it’s for articles not user pages. Thanks, and be well! - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 08:40, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@PotsdamLamb: The QDs I just declined were all for user pages. Those are the ones I said could be taken to RFD. -- Auntof6 (talk) 08:41, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@PotsdamLamb: If you meant that RFD is for articles and not user pages, that is not true. We have done RFDs for user pages before. -- Auntof6 (talk) 08:42, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@PotsdamLamb: Be advised that I am not telling you to blank the pages. This should be done by an admin if done at all. -- Auntof6 (talk) 08:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Auntof6 Then I will need to figure out how to do the bulk page deletion for an RfD. Thanks, and be well! - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 08:45, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@PotsdamLamb: One way is to do an RFD for one of them, then do a manual edit to the RFD page to add the others. -- Auntof6 (talk) 08:50, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Auntof6 I can do that. Can I include any pages under their sock account if I find anywhere that are also in line with the issues or do I need to make two discussions because it’s two different user names? Thanks, and be well! - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 08:54, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@PotsdamLamb: IMO, that would depend. How many sock accounts and how many pages? -- Auntof6 (talk) 09:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Auntof6 See Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser#BottleOfSoup. Thanks, and be well! - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 09:01, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@PotsdamLamb: I see one sock listed there, and I don't see any subpages under it, so I think this is a moot question. -- Auntof6 (talk) 09:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
I hadn’t looked yet. So thank you. Thanks, and be well! - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 09:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Auntof6 Also I still feel the QD is justified as all of those are just copied from enwp with no simplification on them. Others are translated (by editors own admission) using google translate and something they marked as MT translated. So I’m not sure they should really go to RfD to be honest. That’s why a lot of them have red link templates and red link cats on them. Thanks, and be well! - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 09:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@PotsdamLamb: The QD option for non-simplified pages applies to article space, not user space. People are allowed to have non-simplified stuff in their user space so they can work on it. -- Auntof6 (talk) 09:11, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Auntof6 However, considering they are indefinitely blocked, would that still apply? Thanks, and be well! - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 09:12, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@PotsdamLamb: Yes. User space pages don't turn into articles when a user gets indeffed. I know it's frustrating, but we don't bypass requirements just because a user is indeffed (or banned). -- Auntof6 (talk) 09:21, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Auntof6 Apologies as I was going directly off of your words People are allowed to have non-simplified stuff in their user space so they can work on it. but if they are indeffed/banned, they can no longer work on them. But anyways, so we aren’t filling up this page, I’ll put them all to RfD tomorrow from a pc. Thanks for explaining. Thanks, and be well! - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 09:27, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

re: one strike change

Hi, with what you said on User talk:SportsOlympic#Unblock request, I probably agree. I noticed it has got stricter over the years. Wikipedia talk:Blocks and bans#Amendment to ONESTRIKE was made as over time, the rule had also changed more from banned users into just indef users. The block itself was probably one of the poorest blocks I've seen in terms of justification and I wasn't a fan at the time, but that's a matter for another day :) Usually we are a bit more generous than onestrike anyway. --Ferien (talk) 21:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, rule creep can be a problem. The thing with one strike was that it was designed to protect the project not punish people who people didn't get along with fr33kman 18:59, 19 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello change

hello I am new here. as I have started to collaborate with the Sindh Adabi Board which is affiliated with the local government to save the Sindhi literature. I hope it would be ok to for me to collborate with them. I am also economics and history student with masters degree.


so I got the question here.


how do article publishing and article undeleting process works here? it seems many sindhi literature subjects are getting vanished due to the poor press or writers support.

any guidance would be great cheers!

Jinglingzone (talk) 14:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Basically subjects must meet WP:GNG, include unbiased references, be of neutral points of view and be able to pass peer review if needed. Conflicts of interest must also be avoided which means people who work for an organisation should avoid writing articles about or concerning that organisation. Articles must be written in simple English using words contained in WP:BE850 and WP:BE1500 and be written in a way that the average student in US grades 6-9 can read and understand. Our mission is to offer articles that exist on the normal English Wikipedia but in simpler English. Feel free to ask members of the community for help on WP:ST. If you need the aid of an admin you can ask for help on WP:AN. If a member of the community contacts you with comments about your work assume that they are trying to help you and are not criticising you. If I can help please ask for help. Good luck and happy editing. fr33kman 15:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

I get it ː)
I won't write about any org. but my focus will be to preserve the Sindhi literature based on a neutral point of view.
I have last question. how do we request for articles undeletion if they're deleted due to not enough attention from writers from various areas
Thanks a lot sir for your response. it means a lot to me. Cheers Jinglingzone (talk) CaptVII̟̠- 15:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Bring it up on WP:DRV. fr33kman 15:59, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
thanks ill check Jinglingzone (talk) CaptVII̟̠- 17:46, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply