Hello friends! Welcome to my user talk page!

The Writer's Barnstar
While going through the list of pages, I saw many pages that you created. This star is for creating pages on unique topics that were never covered on Wikipedia before.-BRP ever 01:30, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
Great Contributor
Thank you for your great works here on this wiki, we really appreciate your works here.

🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ) ꯱꯸:꯳꯹, ꯲꯶ ꯅꯣꯚꯦꯝꯕꯔ ꯲꯰꯲꯱ (IST)

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Nice work on the new polo articles you've created. They're quite an interesting read, so thank you for making them :) SHB2000 (talk) 22:24, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Women South Asia 2021 Barnstar
Hello Haoreima,
Thank you for your participation in 'Wiki Loves Women South Asia 2021'. One or more of your submitted articles have been accepted in the contest. This barnstar is given to you as a reminder of appreciation for contributing to the acceleration of Wikipedia through writing articles at this event. We hope that your cooperation will continue in the future.

Stay wholesome and safe.
Local Organizer, Wiki Loves Women South Asia 2021
20:28, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

The India Barnstar
Thanks for your contributions to topics related to Manipur. Guides and topics related to North-east India are really lagging behind. Your hard work is seen and appreciated.

2006nishan178713t@lk 13:49, 8 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! change

Some cookies to welcome you!  

Welcome to Wikipedia, Haoreima! I'm ImprovedWikiImprovment and an active editor here. Thank you for your changes. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out Wikipedia:Questions, or send me a message on my talk page. I like to help new people, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! --IWI (talk) 12:37, 22 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Barnstar for You! change

  The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Your great work editing geographic articles. Thank you for your work. Please keep going! George (Kirkburn) (talk) 19:29, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for motivation! Haoreima (talk) 19:42, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Help with Wikidata and categories change

Regarding guidance I can give you: my special focus is on making information accessible within and between WP projects. This includes:
  • Wikidata items for pages, including connecting to equivalent pages in other WP language projects ("interwiki" links)
  • Creating and populating categories for pages, maintaining hierarchies (subcategories) and interwiki links at the category level

This will involve my studying your edits till I get the scope of what exists. You can expect this will be somewhat systematic, with activity every day or so. If this seems suitable to you, I suggest we give it a trial. As the Users @Belwine: and @Auntof6: have already been helpful with your queries, and they're also highly active in the Simple English WP, here's my shout-out to them that I'm agreeable to picking up the task of upgrading Meitei pages with you here. NB: remember to indent your reply with a colon mark at the start of the line. -- Deborahjay (talk) 10:46, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Examine others' edits in Compare selected versions (View history) change

Are you familiar with the "Compare selected revisions" feature of the "View history" tab? It shows you exactly what each next edit does.

  • Select a pair of edits by clicking on two "radio buttons" at the start of those lines.
  • This displays a pair of texts: pre- and post-edit with the changes highlighted (on the right). Below is the more recent page version.
  • (Note: Be sure not to edit there in an old version!)
  • If there are more edits after the pair you compare, you can view them by clicking on the right-facing arrows ("Newer diff").

I highly suggest you view these regularly if another editor (especially a more experienced one) is editing pages you've created and developed. -- Deborahjay (talk) 12:02, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sure, thanks. I will try to follow your instructions as much as possible. Haoreima (talk) 17:27, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Learning Wikidata change

Per our recent discussion on my Talk page: I consider learning the basics of Wikidata a valuable skill set for an active contributor as you are. Here are some suggestions to start:
1. View the edit history of d:User:Awangba Mangang. To do this:

  • In Wikidata, go to your own Contributions.
  • Open the downward-pointing arrow to the left of Search for contributions.
  • Where your User name appears (as "IP address or username:"), substitute Awangba Mangang
  • That name will appear with a gray background under where you entered it. Click on the gray-background name to confirm.
  • Below, select Search (blue box with white letters). This allows you to study Wikidata items edited by User:Awangba Mangang

2. See that you have the ability to add interwiki links:

  • Open the Wikidata item for Nongthang Leima (Q85789406).
  • Underneath the sections titled "Statements" and "Identifiers" - do you have the section "Wikipedia" with links to three WP language projects (en, mni, simple)? If so, try each link.
    • Write your reply here: Yes / No

Once you've had some time to explore the first topic and have answered the second, we'll discuss further activities for you. -- Deborahjay (talk) 22:18, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Deborahjay: Well, thanks for your help. I will ping you as soon as possible when I set my work to wiki data. I am replying you right now so that you may not get mind with me that I am not responding. I will always accompany the helps you render. Haoreima (talk) 14:51, 25 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

A present for you change

I have given a 24 inch iMac to you. The iMac features a M1 processor, 16 GB of RAM and 1 terabyte of storage. Alcatel 144895534 (talk) 16:15, 16 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Alcatel 144895534: Thanks for the present. It's a super brand, I am happy using it. Lol. Haoreima (talk) 11:37, 17 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2021-29 change

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2021-30 change

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2021-31 change

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2021-32 change

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2021-33 change

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2021-34 change

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2021-35 change

References change

Hi there! So I fixed [[Haosi Namoinu]] to look right. You can take a look at all of the changes I made. I also would ask you read WP:Cite, particularly WP:Cite#Template with a focus on the WP:Cite#Common Templates and WP:Cite#Using refToolbar. Using bare references is not good and on this article all of the books were typed over and over, except the last one. To help prevent you from doing all of that, once you make the first citation, before you save it, give it a Ref name and then click on the preview to make sure there are no errors. Typically if you paste the URL into it, most of the information should be filled in for you. If you have any questions, please tag me on this page and I will help you. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 18:57, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

PotsdamLamb Things I generally do in wikipedia is to create articles and to put appropriate references so that these aren't deleted or merged (things I don't want) by other editors. But what you are asking me to do is very difficult for me because I seldom use desktop, I keep myself attached to mobile usages generally! So, I only expect edits for such decorations of links by others, because decorations or no decorations don't affect the existence of the article I created. In fact, what really matters is the presence of the appropriate reference links. So, help me for decorations! Haoreima (talk) 19:06, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hi so these are not decorations as you state. The references are required and have to be in a certain format to be picked around the world and to provide more links to access the resources. Websites change all the time so if you only list a website it will more than likely be gone in a couple of years or so. You also need to provide access dates because all I can do on that is use the date I fixed it and not the actual date it was accessed.
When you create an article you have to include the references and not depend on others to do it for you. That is something you need to do. If you eliminate the m on the url (force desktop mode on your device) you will have access to the tool bar to do this appropriately. Having others do it for all of the articles you have created causes us to focus on those articles and fixing them instead of other things I need to do on other articles. Thanks! PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 19:20, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Inline source citations use tags in the form of <ref> reference information here </ref> . I, at least, perform this general norm from WP:Cite. Other than this, I don't know about usage of templates. So, it's better to do upto what I know well rather than to create errors in doing things I don't have knowledge. Haoreima (talk) 19:35, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
(talk page stalker) A feature that may be helpful is the "Cite" option in Visual Editor that is available also on mobile. Most citations will just work if you put the URL in the "Automatic" section, and the citation will be created for you. Sometimes, you do have to go through the manual option, which is slower. --Ferien (talk) 19:41, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Ferien I have been explaining that but as he said he only uses mobile and he is only using a bare ref as he stated above. The problem is the references are all the same and a copy paste so it appears like 5-8 sources used, but when fixed, it drops down to 1 or 2 sources. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 20:24, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
That is why I pointed you to the correct way to do it. The in-line citation is also on that link. If you do just what you have been doing it becomes a mess and errors are prone to happen when you just list them like you did instead of a correct citation and giving it a name. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 20:12, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Reverted change

Hi I just reverted your edit to the reference as that is not the correct title of the work. We cannot add words into a title. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 20:09, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

(talk page stalker) @PotsdamLamb: I don't think rollback was appropriate for that edit, though. --Ferien (talk) 20:17, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
I didn't use rollback @Ferien. I undid it. The title of the work is A Human turning Harinongnang not A Human turning into Harinongnang. The word into does not fit into this statement of the title as they are not physically turning into something or any other definition of the word. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 20:22, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
PotsdamLamb, the tag here shows you rollbacked it. Also, the title of the page (the one that shows when you hover over the tab in a browser) is A Human turning into Harinongnang whilst on the actual page it says A Human turning Harinongnang, and if I recall correctly, those browser titles are used in the citations. Also, the link is a folk tale, I've read it and it seems that the human was "turning into Harinongnang". --Ferien (talk) 20:42, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
The tag shows that for all of them. I did not use the rights I have though. As far as the title of the work. If you look at the work title, it is without the "into" so we cannot change the title of something we did not create. See The work. The html in the page is different from the title of the work. The full title of the page is A Human turning into Harinongnang Taibang Meena Harinongnang Onba that is through the source coding. So it is either an error on webmaster or an error on the work creator. Typically in these kinds of situations I take the title of the source over the title of the webpage, as the work is what we are citing, not the title of the page through the code. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 20:52, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
PotsdamLamb One thing I really don't appreciate you to do is not to merge links because they are just from a single book. For example, see this one and this one are both from a single website. But Google Books website is really unique from other websites. That means with the mentioning of certain words in the links like "Haosi-Namoinu-only-daughter", links will appear like this one and when searching for "Haosi-Namoinu-cicada", results will appear like this one. And if you merged all those unique search results into one link, just because they are from the same web, then other reviewers will say that the latter links provided are not reliable. Haoreima (talk) 06:24, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
The URLs all point to the same book. If there is a certain page it’s on you need to cite the page or pages. You cannot list the same book numerous times as it doesn’t work like that. This is why I’m telling you to use the citation tool. There are certain things that have to be present in a citation. Again all you are doing is using bare references which again you should not be doing. If you can provide the page or pages that these are on I can update the citation to reflect that and it will go to that. By providing the page numbers it will divide them out but you did not do that on the originals. This will prove as reliable and handle everything. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 06:58, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
I understand what you mean! But the search results are totally different though they belong to the same book. But I don't know how to put the page no. in the citation styling. So, do that for me. I will learn that from how you did. Haoreima (talk) 07:01, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
No worries. Put the links on this conversation and the page or page numbers and I’ll update them. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 07:54, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bare_URLs#What_is_wrong_with_bare_URLs? PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 07:01, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
PotsdamLamb See! there's no bare URL in that page. Haoreima (talk) 07:03, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Because I fixed them already. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 07:55, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
PotsdamLamb I don't know where is the page number located! Help me in finding out the page numbers. Haoreima (talk) 08:07, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
So typically they will be located on the page you are looking at or you may have to count them. Typically the first few pages are in Roman language so you will see I, II, IV, etc. The numeric format most times will be centered on the bottom of the page or in the top corner (either right or left side based on what side of the book it is on for a physical book). If you can provide me a link I can look for you. I’m on my way to fire an officer right now so I’ll get to it shortly. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 09:25, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
PotsdamLamb Take care Jerry, don't let your aim missed! Lol! Haoreima (talk) 09:50, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Huh? PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 14:18, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

WLW South Asia 2021 change

I observe you are joining Wikiprojects. If you're looking for a place to apply that diligence that I see so praised, may I invite you to Wiki Loves Women South Asia 2021 on the Simple English Wikipedia? There is a small cash prize for the person who writes the best articles about gender gap, women's empowerment, feminism and related subjects. Darkfrog24 (talk) 03:47, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Darkfrog24 I have participated there. But what is meant by "per language", as described there. Can this project exist in any languages of wikipedia? If so, what about Meitei Wikipedia? Haoreima (talk) 03:56, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Here is the list of Wikipedias in the contest. The rule is that any Wikipedia for a language spoken in South Asia may hold part of the contest. (The organizers say English counts, and Simple English Wikipedia writes for people who are not native speakers of English.) Meitei is spoken in India, so I think they will say yes if you want to start a contest on the Meitei Wikipedia. It's only one day in and might not be too late. The contest runs from September 1 to September 30. Darkfrog24 (talk) 04:40, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to WikiProject Animals change

  Welcome to WikiProject Animals!
Welcome to WikiProject Animals! Welcome new members. I hope you have a delightful time here and improve lots of articles on animals!. Also thank you for joining us and all ideas that can be used to develop this project further is welcome

Hello Haoreima, I would like to welcome you to WikiProject Animals and also thank you for joining because you can be of great help in creating articles about animals because if you look at simple wikipedia it doesn't have a significant number of articles about animals. But if you check the number of animals on Earth there are hundreds of thousands of them. If we create all of them we can contribute greatly to simple wikipedia. Also we have tasks at User:AJona1992/Wikiproject Animals and at the talk page you can make suggestions about how we can improve to achieve our goals. Thanks for reading and joining. Space chinedu (talk) 06:15, 3 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about the red link I spelt the article wrong but you get the idea Space chinedu (talk) 06:16, 3 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikiproject Agriculture change

  Welcome to WikiProject Agriculture!
Welcome to WikiProject Agriculture! I hope you have a delightful time here and improve lots of articles on agriculture! and all comments and thoughts on how to improve the Wikiproject is welcome in talk page. Once again thank you for joining.

Sorry I didn't respond sooner Space chinedu (talk) 12:20, 3 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Space chinedu It's ok. And thanks for your warm words. Haoreima (talk) 15:26, 3 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2021-36 change

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2021-37 change

Calling people "dear" change

You might not know this, but calling someone "dear" is considered rude unless they are a relative or a close friend. I'm not telling you to stop, but you should be aware that people might have a negative opinion of you when you do that. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:11, 23 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Auntof6: So, how should I address people? Haoreima (talk) 04:36, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Just by their user name would be fine. The reason using "dear" isn't good is that it can seem condescending or belittling. Probably no one has felt that way so far, but it's good to know that they might. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:12, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Auntof6: And what about you, ma'am? Is "ma'am" ok, or "aunt" for you? Haoreima (talk) 08:24, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
"Auntof6" is fine. Using terms like "ma'am" or "sir" can imply that the person using them is inferior to the person they're talking to—at least in American usage, which is what I use—and I prefer to think of everyone here as equals. --Auntof6 (talk) 09:11, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Auntof6: If possible, allow me to use "bro" or "sis" if I know the gender, because I think this will bring people in the wiki, closer among one another! Allow me please! Haoreima (talk) 09:16, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
You can call people whatever you want; I'm not telling you not to. I just wanted you to understand how people might take it. I don't think calling people bro or sis will make them feel closer. It would make me feel uncomfortable, and I'm sure there are others who wouldn't like it, either. --Auntof6 (talk) 11:04, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Auntof6: Why so uncomfortable on calling "sis"? Haoreima (talk) 11:49, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
I just wouldn't care to be called bro or sis. It implies a level of familiarity that I don't want here. Some people see their interactions here as working with friends. I see it more as working with colleagues. --Auntof6 (talk) 18:22, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Auntof6: Sorry to butt in here, but in some cultures calling someone "dear" is considered to be respectful. I have many foreign friends who call me "dear" all the time and they mean it to be respectful. They also call me "sir" and "boss" in a similarly affectionate way. Blissyu2 (talk) 15:53, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Blissyu2: I suggest people only use such words if an editor accepts, many of us do not live in such cultures, and dear is taken... differently in most places. 💠Ely - Talk💠 15:56, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Elytrian I am guessing that you are following this user talk page. I butted in and you double-butted in right back, and then butted in on something else below. Perhaps I should be careful not to butt in or else I will be double-butted in! Anyway, where was I? So anyway, I don't think that there is a policy banning the use of the word "dear" and I am a great believer that if the intention is good then we should treat it that way. Otherwise we are assuming bad faith, and I think that there is a policy on Wikipedia somewhere saying that we should not do that. Blissyu2 (talk) 16:12, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
There is not, but its just uncomfortable and creepy to most people here on the wiki (people here are mostly American and European due to their fluent English that is valued in writing pages). If the intention is good, let it be good. But a notice should be given. 💠Ely - Talk💠 16:26, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
I find it creepy that people watch other people's talk pages. I remember a time when that was banned, but it seems to be okay now. Blissyu2 (talk) 17:05, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
I'm not watching his talk page. I'm just checking new changes, and I saw this. Also the (talk page stalker) template is a joke relating to en wiki-jaguars (as part of their wiki fauna nonsense). 💠Ely - Talk💠 17:35, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Fair enough. Anyway, I think this is something from India, which is predominantly English-speaking, though other parts of South-East Asia also seem to have this kind of idea, from English-speaking countries. It's a culture thing, not a language thing. I am always wary to tell people to adopt our culture in preference to their own. As long as they mean well, I think they are good to go. Blissyu2 (talk) 04:03, 27 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Elytrian: not everyone. We have numerous editors from Canada as well, and I'm neither American, Canadian nor European. SHB2000 (talk) 00:17, 27 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
I'm giving a general overview. Most of our editors speak English as their native language, generally. 💠Ely - Talk💠 03:42, 27 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
True, including myself even though I come from the Anglo-sphere. SHB2000 (talk) 05:11, 27 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
No one, including me, said there was any kind of policy about this. I also know that it's different in some cultures. I wanted to make sure that Haoreima knew that, too, so that he'd know he might be offending people or making them uncomfortable. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:42, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Edit horror film decade sections on English Wikipedia change

Dear friend I have a request can you edit horror film on English Wikipedia create a 1896-1919 section, a 1920-1959 section, 1960-1969 section, and a 1970-present section just like you have them on here. Horrorfan1000000 (talk) 14:57, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

The decade sections for Horror movie on here on Simple-English Wikipedia say 1896-1919, 1920-1959, 1960-1969, and 1970-present can you do the same for horror film on English Wikipedia create the exact decade sections 1896-1919, 1920-1959, 1960-1969, and 1970-present but on the horror film on English Wikipedia. Horrorfan1000000 (talk) 15:05, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

I know you were blocked from Wikipedia but what if you can create a whole new different account a different username and a different password. Horrorfan1000000 (talk) 15:24, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Horrorfan1000000 Hello I know you want me to develop the article but I am sorry for I can't help you till now. Only when I am able to edit en wikipedia, I might try. But I have seen someone had discussed about the similar topic at the talk page of Sakura emad with @Sakura emad, SHB2000, and Elytrian: Hope these guys might help you. Haoreima (talk) 16:21, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Haoreima i suggest you should not offer a single help until he/she decides to listen to us. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 16:25, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Haoreima: I agree with Sakura. Please see the comment I made on @Horrorfan1000000's talk page, and @Sakura emad's talk page, and @Djsasso's talk page on this same topic. 💠Ely - Talk💠 16:28, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Haoreima: i already told this user numerous of times

@Friday3jason.webp i will try my best to teach you the basics, the way you can get the best practices on wikipedia is that enough for you? right?
— User:Sakura emad

@Friday3jason.webp if you listen to me everything can be smooth and normal, i am not going to repeating myself Please listen otherwise i can't, if you're going to listen write "i will listen" so i can know you're showing improvement sign
— User:Sakura emad

the case was sockpuppetry and it was verified by a check user Please refrain from using multiple accounts unless you follow the rules
— User:Sakura emad

🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 16:29, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
i really don't know and would like to know what makes it so hard @Horrorfan1000000 to listen to us, for what we have to say, i told the user that what i am going to say is important for your future career on the entire wikimedia projects and the way you contribute, but idk why @Horrorfan1000000 choose to speak to different users on wikipedia while the results will be the same. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 16:33, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Sakura emad and Elytrian: Now, what shall we do? Haoreima (talk) 16:32, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Wait for block, J991 has already started a Vandalism In Progress report. 💠Ely - Talk💠 16:35, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Haoreima: as i suggested Please do not offer a single help because the user is not listen to us, for them to get help, the very first step they should do is create a single and real account that solely belongs to them not anyone else, then secondly they should use {{User alternative account banner}} to link all other alternative accounts to the real account, that's a critical Point shouldn't be ignored in order to participate, third they should not engage in sockpuppetry never again in the future, if they wish to create another account they should use {{User alternative account banner}} again and explain the purpose of using alternative accounts in accordance with wikipedia's Policy WP:SOCKLEGIT. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 16:40, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Sakura emad Yes, you are right! I used to suspect the editing habits. But since it's not confirmed, I can't say that with full confidence. So, I pinged you, Ely and SHB! Haoreima (talk) 16:47, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
  hope everything gets back to normal. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 16:55, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Sakura emad Yeah! Haoreima (talk) 16:57, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your agree that there should be a 1896-1919 section, 1920-1959 section, 1960-1969 section, and a 1970-present section on horror film on English Wikipedia? Horrorfan1000000 (talk) 17:26, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Perhaps. Perhaps not. But first stop socking. 💠Ely - Talk💠 17:29, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ok then just go to English Wikipedia and edit horror film and I'll stop. Horrorfan1000000 (talk) 17:33, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Horrorfan1000000 Stop evading your global lock and socking. SHB2000 (talk) 04:06, 27 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello change

Hi. I noticed you on the RfD comments as someone who seems to create a lot of articles that are then nominated for deletion. Why not just contribute to existing articles? It's a lot less stressful! I note in particular that you are getting into conflict with one user, SHB2000, who has been writing "delete per nom" and not explaining why he thinks that an article should be deleted. You should note that RfD is not a vote and someone who writes "delete per nom" is usually ignored by the closing admin. If the article is notable and can prove it, then it is kept, otherwise it is not. As a note, for the most part the Simple Wikipedia is meant to reflect existing Wikipedia entries but is made simpler. Thus the articles should generally be more notable here than the requirements in other Wikis. Our aim is to simplify existing topics for non-native English speakers, not to create new topics that don't exist anywhere else. Blissyu2 (talk) 15:50, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Blissyu2: SHB2000 explains it very clearly, not notable means not notable, and bad sourcing means bad sourcing. SHB is quite experienced, and until recently I have suspected you are part of a sockfarm. I've explained on some of his deletion requests as well. Simple wiki does not have higher notability standards too. You are quite confused. See Wikipedia:Notability. 💠Ely - Talk💠 15:59, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Elytrian okay. I thought it did have higher standards. I will delete my comment then. My apologies. Why are you accusing me of being a sockpuppet? I had those accusations on En-wiki years ago. Quite untrue I'm afraid. Some people were playing politics. I'm not sure who the other people were. I worked out who some were but most were a mystery. It all got quite silly really. Just because I criticised Wikipedia and highlighted some of their mistakes they decided to make up claims that I had created multiple accounts and been a vandal and all of these other silly things. What happened was that I had an alternating IP that was shared by thousands of people on different days. It was a case of mistaken identity and a presumption that we were all one person when there were actually many people doing very different things to each other. Blissyu2 (talk) 16:05, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Not that. It was just your early behaviour relating to Dc Themmie. 💠Ely - Talk💠 16:18, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
I'm not sure what you mean. I don't think I've edited Dc Themmie at all and the only thing I can find is my comment on the Deletion Review for that article, in which I opposed it being recreated [1]. Is that bad behaviour? Blissyu2 (talk) 13:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Elytrian: Not notable means not notable indeed, but you really need to explain why. RfD is not RfA; !votes should never be "per nom" and people are discouraged from just saying "not notable". --Ferien (talk) 16:12, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
SHB has explained, but I'm stating a fact that 'not notable' clearly shows annoyance to why it wasn't a QD. As for @Haoreima's topics, he uses Google books as a source, which is not reliable, (even though policies say its recommended, I suggest we change that) and the book from it shows no case of a distinguished expert or trying to persuade notability. His topics aren't notable from even a regional point of view (from my point of view on the regional point of view). Votes are never per nom, but I'm leaning towards the deletionist's side in my behaviour. 💠Ely - Talk💠 16:22, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Ferien: Hello pal! I have something I forgot to ask you for many times back. In the last edit of yours here in this section, once you reverted someone's edit, and at the very same reverting edit, you write your reply (your own wordings were added). How were such actions done? I only know just reverting in one edit and saying subsequent words in later edits! Please explain me the steps! I am talking about this! :) Haoreima (talk) 02:31, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hello Haoreima. I just pressed undo like normal but then added my reply in the text box, just like a normal edit. Thanks, --Ferien (talk) 16:33, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
Elytrian, not really. "Not notable" doesn't show annoyance as to why it wasn't a QD. It just says that: "Not notable". No-one is going to read anyone else's mind or think of what someone usually puts on an RfD, they are just looking at that one comment. "Not notable" does not translate to "QD should have been used". In most cases, QD A4 is used when it shouldn't be and RfD is used too little for non-notable topic, in my opinion.
About Google Books not being reliable, we can't just judge millions of books in an instant. Sometimes a book shows notability about a topic, sometimes it doesn't.
Of course, you can identify as a deletionist or an inclusionist – I am somewhere between the two – but lots of "per nom" or "not notable" comments aren't really useful comments to add to an RfD and when I was closing RfDs at that time, just made it more difficult to close RfDs. --Ferien (talk) 16:42, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2021-39 change

Images change

Haoreima, all your articles have images that are too large and placed incorrectly. As per the manual of style, most images should be the default size (in the visual editor, idk about source) and aligned to the right. Most of your articles have these issues. I went ahead and fixed Meitei festivals as an example. 💠Ely - Talk💠 10:44, 27 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Elytrian Thanks for help. And sorry for those. It's because I generally use mobile version view instead of desktop version view while using wikipedia. So, in mobile views, every images appear normal to me. Haoreima (talk) 11:21, 27 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
We do have some examples where it would be better off at the centre, like Walls of Jerusalem National Park but that's an odd exception SHB2000 (talk) 11:44, 27 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sorry I don't speak Meitei and Google isn't offering me a translation change

Hi Haoreima. Thank you for your welcome message for me on the Meitei Wikipedia. Sadly, I only speak very limited amounts of about 10 languages and that does not include Meitei. The closest language I speak even a little bit of to that is probably Japanese or Indonesian, and they are not very close at all! I do not know what you said! It just shows as little boxes on my screen! Thank you for your welcome message, though, but I don't think I will contribute to that wiki, as I do not want to make things worse. I will leave the contributions to native speakers. Blissyu2 (talk) 11:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blissyu2 No worries! I always try to give a welcome message to everybody who created their user accounts there in the mni wikipedia automatically after logging in there. In fact, I am acting like a bot, when there's no bot working in the mni wikipedia. Btw, if you are worrying about machine translation, don't worry. Google Translate has already put Meitei language (aka. Manipuri language) in the beta translation service. So, within a few months or at least one year, Meitei (aka. Manipuri) will appear in the Google Translate public usage facility. Thanks! Haoreima (talk) 11:13, 28 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Haoreima I registered Blissyu2 on the meta wiki some years ago so I didn't have to personally create a Meitei Wikipedia account as this is my global account. I did this to prevent those silly claims of sockpuppeting. It automatically logs me in whenever I view a new wiki's page. It does have the unfortunate side effect of sometimes automatically logging me out sometimes too but that's just how it goes. I must have looked at a Meitei wiki article at one stage and it automatically created an account for me. Blissyu2 (talk) 13:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, there's no harm in that being done. Looking at Special:CentralAuth/SHB2000, I must've visited 570 different wikis, although most were probably me using SWViewer. SHB2000 (talk) 13:10, 28 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Blissyu2 and SHB2000: Actually, I feel something like loneliness when I visit other languages' wikis, when no one welcomes me or put anything on my talk page. Even when I was very active in some wikis, my talk page remains always blank. This upsets me. So, I don't want other people to have such feelings. That is why I put welcome message to everyone, whether they know Meitei language or not. This case is exceptional to those guys who put redirect to other wikis on their mni talk page, like that of SHB2000. Regards! Haoreima (talk) 17:38, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Blissyu2 and SHB2000: Friends! Yesterday, Google Translate has approved Meitei language (Manipuri language). So, you guys can come at Meitei wikipedia & Meitei wiktionary. 😃 After a long time of hard work in Google Translate community translation platform, the result is sweet. But some of the translations aren't accurate, but most of them are correct! I will try to fix the inaccurate ones with my friends there! :-) :-) --Haoreima (talk) 10:56, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Are you using translate.google.com? I'm still not getting an option for Manipuri. Could it be a regional feature only available in India? SHB2000 (talk) 10:59, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
No, it's global feature. GT authority approved it. In the link, I had posted citing sources from the news sites. And in USA & Canada, it's almost ok. My friends told me. A few hours back, there was some problem in India. But now, the problem is almost nullified little by little. And as you are in Australia, I think the problem will be nullified either before or after or simultaneously, but I don't think the speed will be exactly similar to India or any other nations. When I went to Meitei language websites, and press the translate section in the website, it's automatically detecting the passages and translating them into English language! --Haoreima (talk) 11:05, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Strange. I tried using a VPN to access it from a Canadian IP address, and it seemed to work, while it didn't from a French IP address. It could be that Google features usually take a few days to be implemented in Australia and NZ (and this would be no exception), but I'm quite surprised that Assamese, a major language of 25m speakers didn't have a Google Translate option until now. SHB2000 (talk) 11:21, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
SHB2000 Assamese (a language with speakers of big population) & Sanskrit (Latin of the East) are also announced to be approved simultaneously with Meitei language. Regarding the irregularities among the countries in the world about the accessibility of the Translate tool, I asked to the GT team. They replied to me here, that it will take some time. --Haoreima (talk) 11:28, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

google translate change

Don't know why it thinks it's Shanghai... Once google translate gave a translation of 17h30 in Portuguese to 17:30pm in English. Strange algorithm. SHB2000 (talk) 13:30, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

SHB2000 I am active in Espanol and Fracais Quoras, besides English. There, people use "3,8 k" instead of "3.8 k" for 3800. I think this is due to different cultures of different places. And coming back to Sangai and Shanghai, Bengali, Hindi and other Indian languages' GT machine translations as well as transliterations wrongly interpret "Meitei" as "Meity" or "Meeti". In fact, these two "Meity" and "Meeti" literally means "Peter" in Meitei language. Lol! It's very odd to us, seriously. Haoreima (talk) 13:41, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
That was one of the few things I found unusual when I was learning French. So 1.5 in English is 1,5. Probably something with southern European languages? And GT giving "Peter"? Much more unusual than 17:30pm (I've once seen 23:30PM in Thailand once before so it's not completely unusual) SHB2000 (talk) 13:44, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
SHB2000 Though I don't know much about Europe, I think those languages evolved from Latin, for example, Spanish, French, Italian, Portuguese, Romanian, etc. might have different cultures from those of English-German party. And again, Celtic/Gaelic party might have different culture. That might be the reason! And are you asking me something by using 2 question marks "?" in your last talk? I can't understand your 2nd "?"! Can you please elaborate it? Haoreima (talk) 17:33, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

You've got new messages! change

Hello, Haoreima. You have new messages at Prajjwal3959's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

💠Ely - Talk💠 18:15, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Welcoming change

Hi Haoreima, thanks for welcoming new users. Remember to substitute the welcome template by putting subst: before welcome, so it appears like {{subst:welcome}}. Thanks! --Ferien (talk) 20:59, 5 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ferien Yeah, but I still have a confusion. That's what is the difference between {{subst:welcome}} and {{welcome}} in their purposes? Haoreima (talk) 04:24, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Using {{welcome}} will transclude Template:welcome to the user talk page you're posting to, but if you substitute it will put the wikitext from the template on the user talk page. --Ferien (talk) 06:20, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
The main reason is that it somewhat hides the fact that it's a template and it looks more like the welcomer actually wrote that entire message. SHB2000 (talk) 07:07, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
SHB2000 Then, it's a good trick. Lol Haoreima (talk) 07:28, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
It sure is (-: Also the same reason why we substitute warnings and notices which are actually templates. The only place I think where substituting isn't done is Commons because it needs to be autotranslated. SHB2000 (talk) 07:31, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
SHB2000 Unlike other wikis, in Hindi Wikipedia, they use direct template, like I did here before. So, imitating their way, I used welcome template directly in more than 700 user talk pages in Manipuri/Meitei Wikipedia. Lol! See hi:User talk:Haoreima Haoreima (talk) 07:37, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
I think they do something like that on the Italian Wikipedia as well, but I'm not sure because my only activity there is reverting vandalism on my own talk page SHB2000 (talk) 07:40, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
SHB2000 Hey SHB2000! I have a question! Do you have any knowledge about which is the fastest growing wikipedia in the WMF? Regarding the number of articles. I don't know which one it is exactly. But for mni wiki, it's created in February, 2021, and now it exceeded 5000+ articles. So, I was thinking about this! :) :-) Haoreima (talk) 07:53, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
I'm not too sure what it is, but I think it's the English Wikipedia. They get about a hundred new articles every day. But if you look at all WMF sites, including sister projects, that would probably be the English Wiktionary. SHB2000 (talk) 07:56, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
SHB2000 I think Cebuano Wikipedia might soon become the largest wiki. Now, it's 2nd. And, once I have heard that there's a man who used bot to create 10,000 articles everyday for the Cebuano Wikipedia. Most of the articles are stubs. Haoreima (talk) 07:59, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
The bot issue has been a long issue on both the Cebuano and the Waray Wikipedias where 90% of the articles are written by bots. To be fair, I'm not even sure if the bot's articles even grammatically make sense or not though. SHB2000 (talk) 08:01, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
SHB2000 Yeah, but to have such fame for being big, sometimes, I wish to use bots for mni. But the only problem is that I don't have any knowledge about the operation of bot. :) :-) Haoreima (talk) 08:04, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
The bot path however, is very risky, unless there's a similar large regional language (something like Bengali or Nepali but it can be dead languages too like Sanskrit or Pali) that uses the same formatting and language conventions as Meitei. Even if that was the case, we also don't want another Scots Wikipedia incident where Scots is very similar to English SHB2000 (talk) 08:10, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
SHB2000 I have the native level knowledge in Hindi, Manipuri & near native in Urdu, Bengali & basic in Assamese & Arabic (probably MSA) too! And, currently trying to learn Iraqi Arabic! Will this make me ok for using bots? And I don't know how that boy gains the admin rights when he doesn't know Scots! It's also the faults of those who voted him in the RFA! Haoreima (talk) 08:30, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
It's not really an issue with your knowledge, but I'm concerned if the bot makes grammatical errors and all that (even google translate does this, and it's much easier to translate things with Google Translate). And re the Scots Wikipedia incident, the issue there was that there were no native Scots speakers over there so all the admins there don't know how to speak Scots. But I think after the incident, while several articles were deleted, it did bring the attention of numerous native Scots speakers to fix those issues up. SHB2000 (talk) 08:37, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
SHB2000 Wow! Then, I wish to become admin for Scots. :) :-) :-) As far as I know, google translate offers only Scots Gaelic language, and not for Scots language and Scottish language. So, I don't know how they manage to edit Scots language Wikipedia. Haoreima (talk) 08:41, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
And then there's Bot-Jagwar, a bot that has basically created so many entries on the Malagasy Wiktionary + a lot of other wikis as well with large amounts of factual errors. Oh and did I forget, there's Bot-Jagwar II as well. And you know what, there's a third bot as well, run by the same person Ikotobaity. I think there's a fourth one, but I'm not too sure. There's a discussion going on about this on m:Requests for comment/Large-scale errors at Malagasy Wiktionary about these few bots. SHB2000 (talk) 12:31, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
SHB2000 Wow, the meta page you show me is recommended for translation. It's the first time I am experiencing such RfC like stuffs for translations. :) :-) So, I did it for mni too like this m:Requests for comment/Large-scale errors at Malagasy Wiktionary/mni (m:ꯑꯅꯤꯡꯕ ꯐꯣꯡꯗꯣꯛꯂꯛꯅꯕ ꯍꯥꯢꯖꯕ/ꯆꯥꯡ ꯌꯥꯝꯅ ꯁꯣꯢꯕꯁꯤꯡ ꯃꯦꯂꯦꯒꯦꯁꯤ ꯋꯤꯛꯁꯟꯅꯔꯤꯗ) just now. And another thing, yes, whatever you are saying about the bots might be true. It's due to some bad bots that defame people's view towards bots. However, not all the bots are improper. Many are also doing good. So, I am planning about one such after some time. Can you tell me from where shall I request for such privilege? Haoreima (talk) 14:50, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Most bots out there are good, but there's some bad ones as well. But yet the worst one I have seen is Babel AutoCreate, much worse than Jagwar's bots. SHB2000 (talk) 01:07, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2021-41 change

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2021-42 change

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2021-43 change

Wiki Loves Women 2021 change

After careful consideration, it seems that third prize is a tie. Congratulations on your win and thank you for bringing such fine articles to the Simple English Wikipedia! Darkfrog24 (talk) 19:50, 30 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Darkfrog24 Thanks! :) Haoreima (talk) 03:11, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2021-44 change

Image removed change

Hi there - please forgive me, I was working on a large number of pages at the same time and deleted the image from the page as it was blocking most of the article text. I was going to restore it when I had finished the pages I was working on but I will restore it now - thank you for letting me know. Bobo. 11:56, 4 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2021-45 change

A barnstar for you! change

  The Writer's Barnstar
While going through the list of pages, I saw many pages that you created. This star is for creating pages on unique topics that were never covered on Wikipedia before.-BRP ever 01:30, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
@BRPever: Thank you so much, Sir! Have a good day! :) Haoreima (talk) 02:25, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2021-46 change

WLWSA-2021 Newsletter #6 (Request to provide information) change

Wiki Loves Women South Asia 2021
September 1 - September 30, 2021 view details!

Thank you for participating in the Wiki Loves Women South Asia 2021 contest. Please fill out this form and help us to complete the next steps including awarding prizes and certificates.

If you have any questions, feel free to reach out the organizing team via emailing @here or discuss on the Meta-wiki talk page

Wiki Loves Women Team
07:22, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2021-47 change

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2021-48 change

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2021-50 change

articles change

Hi, I am on the fountain tool and I don't see your article up for judging, can you double check to see if it's been judged already or if you have resubmitted it? Tsugaru let's talk! :) 23:11, 17 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

@つがる: I saw it. It's judged already as not accepted. The article is Four Beauties. I saw it like this:

Four Beauties 6 Dec 6:30 AM 0 つがる: 0 not accepted please see talk page of the article. thanks!

I just want you to please review it again as I improved it again according to your suggestions in the article's talk page. :) Haoreima (talk) 04:26, 18 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Yep, I can totally do that. What I just need is for your to resubmit to the fountain, otherwise I can't judge it. Thanks, --Tsugaru let's talk! :) 01:58, 19 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
@つがる: Articles once submitted (no matter if rejected or accepted once) can't be resubmitted again. Whenever tried to resubmit, the fountain mechanism automatically shows a "red cross❌" sign not to do that! Besides, the submission timing is already over, no one can submit any article now! So, please review the article, and if you found it eligible to be accepted, please accept it like you did before to other articles. :) Regards! Haoreima (talk) 02:57, 19 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
You and User:Camouflaged Mirage used to reaccept declined articles before! Please do the same this time too! Haoreima (talk) 02:59, 19 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
I can't remember how we did it last year, I am not too fimilar with how the articles work on the fountain tool, besides that I can either, comment, accept, or decline them. That being said, I will take a look once again and see what I can do. --Tsugaru let's talk! :) 20:42, 19 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, I can't find it in the Queue... I will keep trying. Please hold tight --Tsugaru let's talk! :) 20:43, 19 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Haoreima, I promise I am not playing any tricks on you here, I would never do such a thing, but I am really sorry, I cannot find that article in the Queue when I press "Judge". So unfortunately, I can't re-judge the article for now. Camouflaged Mirage does it work on your end? (Camouflaged Mirage - Also so sorry I was unable to do more judging this year, I was busy with school at the time when the articles were up for judging. I thank you so much for your role!) --Tsugaru let's talk! :) 20:52, 19 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Four Beauties change

Hi, Haoreima, I do appreciate the efforts you put into the article, however if I were to judge it now (I got the issue fixed) I still can't accept it due to the language still not being simple enough. I know it can be hard to write in Simple English, but you are doing such a great job. Would you like an example of where I see some complex language? Thanks ;) Tsugaru let's talk! :) 01:40, 20 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for spamming you talkpage, but I went through the article again, and after the linking, I think it is enough to be accepted. Good work and thanks for putting up with my slowness and confusion. --Tsugaru let's talk! :) 01:56, 20 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
@つがる: Thanks for your understanding! Sometimes, to err is human. And to forgive is divine! :) Haoreima (talk) 02:42, 20 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
:) --Tsugaru let's talk! :) 03:21, 20 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2021-51 change

Polo articles change

  The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Nice work on the new polo articles you've created. They're quite an interesting read, so thank you for making them :) SHB2000 (talk) 22:24, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
@SHB2000: Thank you for the barnstar! Have a good day! :) Haoreima (talk) 04:08, 23 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Same to you :) SHB2000 (talk) 04:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Happy holidays change

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Happy Holidays to you too change

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Returning the favor from meta :) Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:05, 24 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

New categories change

Thank you for creating Category:Christmas WikiLove templates and Category:Happy holidays and seasonal greetings WikiLove templates. When you create a category, please be sure to categorize it appropriately. Neither of these categories is categorized. Thanks!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Auntof6 (talkcontribs) 01:15, 25 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Auntof6: Oh, sorry for late response! Actually, I don't know what to categorize. Sometimes, some categories need not any category further. I thought those categories I created might be like that. Well, if found appropriate to further categorize, I will certainly did it. One is done by someone, another is still not categorized. I am still searching for a suitable one. You can also help me!:-) Haoreima (talk) 08:52, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
I'll look at it later. Just be aware that all categories need to be categorized. Sometimes that's done by a template, such as with Category:2004 births, and on those you won't see the categories when you edit the page. -- Auntof6 (talk) 11:35, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

You've got mail! change

Hello, Haoreima. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience.
Message added 12:17, 26 December 2021 (UTC). You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

--Ferien (talk) 12:17, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Done Haoreima (talk) 12:19, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2021-52 change

Congratulations, WINNER! change

Haoreima, among what I hope were many happy accomplishments this year, you also tied for third in the Wiki Loves Women Edit-a-Thon!


Wiki Loves Women South Asia 2021 Barnstar
Hello Haoreima,
Thank you for your participation in 'Wiki Loves Women South Asia 2021'. One or more of your submitted articles have been accepted in the contest. This barnstar is given to you as a reminder of appreciation for contributing to the acceleration of Wikipedia through writing articles at this event. We hope that your cooperation will continue in the future.

Stay wholesome and safe.
Local Organizer, Wiki Loves Women South Asia 2021
20:28, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Gracias Darkfrog24 ! :-) Haoreima (talk) 01:27, 30 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations! change

  Wikipedia Asian Month 2021
Hello, thank you for participating in Wikipedia Asian Month 2021. We are grateful for your contributions! All the pages you created help the world know more about Asia and Asian cultures. You have created four or more pages that were accepted so you will receive a postcard for Wikipedia Asian Month 2021. Happy New Year and wishing you a good 2022! -Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 08:31, 1 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Haoreima, I would also like to extend my congrats for you creating four or more articles at WAM this year, I hope you will join us again next year! Sincerely, --Tsugaru let's talk! :) 03:34, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2022-01 change

Harry Potter vandal change

Hello Haoreima, it's good to be back! I'm currently in an edit war with a vandal who is removing information about Hermione Granger from Harry Potter articles, but it seems that there are no admins online to block them. What can we do? Cheers, Hockeycatcat (talk) 06:07, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello @Hockeycatcat:! If you don't find any local admins available, it's best to contact any one of the active admins of metawiki because they have access to both their own local as well as global (including this very wiki)! Haoreima (talk) 06:12, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the suggestion, I'll see if I can get one of them to come over here :) Cheers, Hockeycatcat (talk) 06:15, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hockeycatcat and Haoreima, in the future please use WP:VIP for these reports, or if it's urgent you can ask in #wikipedia-simple on IRC. Global sysops do not have admin rights on here, and though Stewards technically do they should generally not use them here. I hope this helps, and if you have any questions please ask. Happy editing! Vermont (talk) 01:21, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Horror film on English Wikipedia change

Dear friend I have a request for you for the article Horror film on English Wikipedia underneath the 1970s section can you write down The 1970s began a new age for horror films with the transition from "classic" to modern horror underneath the George A. Remero image? (talk) 01:54, 8 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2022-02 change

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2022-03 change

19:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2022-04 change

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2022-04 change

This Month in Education: January 2022 change

21:38, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

17:42, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2022-06 change

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2022-06 change

21:16, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Womens' markets change

Hi Haoreima, I'm Griff! I was during my regular review of new changes and a change you made was marked as possibly a problem. I don't think it is, but I am a little confused by it and was hoping you could help me understand. In this change you made, I don't see the connection between the Ima Market and Leimarel Sidabi or her incarnations. Can you clarify? Thanks Griff (talk) 13:44, 9 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Griffinofwales: The Leimarel Sidabi Ima Keithel (Complex Number 1), the Imoinu Ima Keithel (Complex Number 2) and the Phouoibi Ima Keithel (Complex Number 3) are the three main building complexes of the Ima Keithel. Imoinu and Phouoibi are also incarnations of goddess Leimarel Sidabi. In Meitei religion, markets are not only for commerce but also for sacredness and holiness. Markets in Meitei populated areas always houses at least a shrine in the middle of the complex in honor of the goddess of wealth. This is compulsory as well as mandatory. If not, the agony of the goddess of wealth might bring instability to the state's economy. Haoreima (talk) 13:55, 9 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
I'm not an expert on this, but just so I understand, markets in Meitei areas all have shrines to Leimarel Sidabi? If that is the case, would it perhaps be better to include this information in the main article to the goddess and discuss not just this specific market, but all markets, and maybe use the Ima Market as an example? Griff (talk) 13:59, 9 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Griffinofwales: Good idea! But I mean goddess of wealth. Wealth is an attribute possessed by many goddesses. Some use in the name of Leimarel Sidabi. Some use other names of other goddesses (her incarnations, not Leimarel directly). How shall we proceed in this condition? Haoreima (talk) 14:05, 9 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps we could make a Worship section in the main article that talks about how the Meitei people worship the goddess or her incarnations through shrines in their markets, using the Ima Market as an example? I might be wrong about this, but I feel like we should make it clear that the Ima Market is not the only example of these shrines? Griff (talk) 14:11, 9 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Griffinofwales: If you want to add this in the article about Leimarel Sidabi, then I have already added it at Leimarel Sidabi#Namesakes. If you want any improvements, you are welcome to do so! Haoreima (talk) 14:14, 9 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2022-07 change

19:18, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2022-08 change

19:12, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia Asian Month 2021 Postcard change

Dear Participants,


It's Wikipedia Asian Month's honor to have you all participated in Wikipedia Asian Month 2021, the seventh Wikipedia Asian Month. Your achievements were fabulous, and all the articles you created make the world can know more about Asia in different languages! Here we, the Wikipedia Asian Month International team, would like to say thank you for your contribution also cheer for you that you are eligible for the postcard of Wikipedia Asian Month 2021. Please kindly fill the form, let the postcard can send to you asap!

This form will be closed at March 15.


Thank you and best regards,

Wikipedia Asian Month International Team, 2022.02

Spelling of an Indian phrase change

Hi! May I ask, what is exact Indian (or Hindi language or regional Indian language), phrase for "floating lake".--I expect to propose that the exact Indian phrase, should maybe be mentioned in the article about that one famous lake. Regards! (talk) 12:37, 23 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

This is an English language wikipedia, not any Indian language like Hindi, Manipuri wikipedias. No need to mention any terms of non English languages unless necessary. Haoreima (talk) 12:40, 23 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sandbox change

Just letting you know that I edited your sandbox and why. The page had several instances of using the parameter "issue" 2 times in the same Infobox royalty template. This caused the page to be listed in an error category. As the page ignores all but the last use when displaying the template and the first uses were all empty, I cleared the early uses and left the ones being displayed. Overall, it will have no affect on the outcome of the paga other than to remove it from the error category. --Creol(talk) 15:33, 23 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Creol: Thanks for doing that. You are free to do so in future too. Actually, when not in use, I usually kept my sandbox empty. I have forgotten to empty my sandbox after my last edit. Now, I have removed most of the contents like I do as usual. Please don't mind. It's not because you did something. Haoreima (talk) 15:39, 23 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2022-09 change

This Month in Education: February 2022 change

23:00, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2022-10 change

21:16, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2022-11 change

22:08, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Question change

When you reverted my bot's edit on Khoriphaba, your edit summary said "It alters everything." Would you please explain what you meant by that? The change I made shouldn't have done anything except combine duplicate, identical references. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:59, 15 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Auntof6 I want to fix some edits that were done before your bot edited the page. To revert their edits, I need your bot's edit to be reverted. Sorry for my wrong edit summary. Btw, I am currently fixing some contents. Once I complete doing so, I will inform you. Haoreima (talk) 09:14, 15 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Auntof6   Done Haoreima (talk) 09:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Archiving discussions change

Can you archive discussions up to Dec 2021 to /Archive/1 as this talk page is getting bigger at 174 kB? BP001002004008 (talk) 10:33, 15 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

BP001002004008 I want to become a record holder! Haoreima (talk) 10:34, 15 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
See en:WP:CHOKING for more details. BP001002004008 (talk) 11:17, 15 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
BP001002004008 Thanks for your concern! What shall I do now? Haoreima (talk) 11:21, 15 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Can you move the first 53 discussions in this page to /Archive/1 and add:
Archives: 1
to the top of this page. BP001002004008 (talk) 11:37, 15 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Why so 53 in particular? Haoreima (talk) 11:38, 15 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
The first 53 discussions date back to 2021. BP001002004008 (talk) 11:39, 15 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Another option is to use automatic archiving. You can see an example of this at the top of my talk page if you edit the page. Just don't use exactly that code because it has my user name in it. User:MiszaBot/config has documentation on the different options. -- Auntof6 (talk) 11:44, 15 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2022-12 change

16:01, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

This Month in Education: March 2022 change

The Signpost: 27 March 2022 change

News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia
  • Eyewitness Wikimedian – Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2022-13 change

19:55, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Deities/Gods and goddesses categories change

Hi, Haoreima. I meant to leave you some messages about this earlier.

  • I renamed the "deities" categories you created because "gods and goddesses" uses simpler words.
  • You had put some entries in both nature deities and water deities, but water deities is a subset of nature deities so they don't need to be in both. I removed the duplicates from the nature gods/goddesses category.
  • I moved the thunder and water categories under the nature category you created (which was renamed to gods and goddesses of nature). That left only two entries in the nature category, so maybe we can find more entries for that.
  • When you create a category, please categorize the category itself.

Thanks. Feel free to let me know if you have questions about any of this. --Auntof6 (talk) 02:22, 3 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Auntof6 Shall we create "those mentioning deities" as redirects for "those renamed mentioning gods and goddesses"? --Haoreima (talk) 02:31, 3 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
I deleted them as part of the rename because I didn't think they were necessary. We don't have them for any of the other gods/goddesses categories. -- Auntof6 (talk) 02:41, 3 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Auntof6 I have recently created Category:Gods and goddesses of sky to fulfill the three contents of a category. Please check if everything is ok! --Haoreima (talk) 02:43, 3 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
That should work, except for a minor change I'll make so that the grammar is good (of the sky, not just "of sky"). -- Auntof6 (talk) 02:47, 3 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Naming god/goddess categories change

When the thing they're a god or goddess of is a unique, tangible thing, the name of the category should usually include the article "the". That's why I renamed that other category to "of the sky". So the new category you created should be "of the moon". I'll rename it, but please keep this in mind when creating categories. If you're not sure, feel free to ask. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:43, 3 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Auntof6 It was better if we named "Category:Moon gods and goddesses" instead of "Category:Gods and goddesses of the moon". Many might not like strict grammatical rules in category names, just my assumption. --Haoreima (talk) 03:51, 3 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Categorize! change

Please categorize your new categories! --Auntof6 (talk) 03:51, 3 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Auntof6 Which one? Please remind me! I can't recall! I have categorized most of them, but I might have missed one or two. --Haoreima (talk) 03:53, 3 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Look at all the categories you've created. The ones that show as "Created blank page" weren't categorized. This includes one you created after I left you this message. -- Auntof6 (talk) 05:56, 3 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Auntof6 Sorry! I couldn't because I don't know how to see the exclusive list of categories I have created. And to check them through my edit history will be very exhaustive since I did a lot of edits today. If you could, please show me! Haoreima (talk) 06:39, 3 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
(talk page stalker) You can see them here: in your contributions page -- *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 06:45, 3 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

21:01, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

My Japanese Niece change

Does this movie really have an official Japanese title ? I tried to find it with the Japanese title that you gave, but nothing appeared. Machine translation of Japanese is not good as you expect, so please stop using it. In my opinion, repeating の sounds weird. MathXplore (talk) 13:53, 5 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

MathXplore Thanks you came across it. Please transcribe this Japanese kanji writing into text form either at my talk page so that I could rewrite there in the article. Or, please do so directly in the article. --Haoreima (talk) 14:04, 5 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
MathXplore It seems like both Japanese and Meitei translations are found only in picture formats (in some posters, that can't be accessed through search) and not in written text forms (that can be accessed through search). The official poster is also seen in this website too. :-) --Haoreima (talk) 14:20, 5 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the information. The poster did not include kanji title but only katakana title, so I used that one. MathXplore (talk) 14:25, 5 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Darkfrog24's message change

Congratulations on your victory and all your hard work. As always, your choice of subjects was impeccable. Darkfrog24 (talk) 18:57, 6 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Darkfrog24 Thank you for your wonderful contribution to the contest as a jury. --Haoreima (talk) 09:26, 7 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2022-15 change

Tech News: 2022-15 change

19:44, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2022-16 change

Tech News: 2022-16 change

23:12, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

This Month in Education: April 2022 change

The Signpost: 24 April 2022 change

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2022-17 change