User talk:Razorflame/Archive 15

Walkers Stadium

Hi Razorflame, I'm curious why you think it should be "...where the Leicester City..."? British English would never say that, and it doesn't make it any simpler in my opinion. Just wondered why? The Rambling Man (talk) 15:44, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

If you read the whole sentence, it says, where the Leicester City F.C club play. If you were to take the sentence as a whole, that is the only way that it makes grammatical sense. Cheers, Razorflame 14:55, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Well, it shouldn't. The C of F.C. stands for club. In British English (and please, feel free to check English Wikipedia on this), we would say "...where Leicester City F.C. play...". Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:53, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

I am all right with you removing the the from the article. I just thought that that was how the grammar of the article was, but obviously, I don't know the rules of British English. Cheers, Razorflame 14:55, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Simple Talk

Hey, do you mind leaving a comment about this? Thanks, SwirlBoy39 17:31, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

I can't seem to find the topic about that. What exactly do you want me to comment on? If you are trying to point me to the fact that Theeyes is a Benniguy sock, I am quite aware of that. Thanks for the heads-up nonetheless. Cheers, Razorflame 22:34, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Your bot on cs.wiki

If you want to get bot-flag, please run your bot for more edits, now there are only several edits. JAn Dudík (talk) 19:25, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

How many more edits? Cheers, Razorflame 22:30, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

20 - 30. JAn Dudík (talk) 05:15, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

I was pretty sure that I've already done 20-30 edits...but I will be glad to run the bot as soon as I get home. Thanks for the concern, Razorflame 14:57, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Darkicebot @ BG WP

Hello. Could you please answer to a question about an edit your bot made. And be sure to keep running the bot until at least 100 edits have been done. Thank you. Spiritia (talk) 12:33, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Answered. Thanks for the concern! Cheers, Razorflame 14:56, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the welcome message IANAV (talk) 15:31, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Not a problem! Cheers, Razorflame 15:32, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Rivers

Do you really think List of rivers of Romania (alphabetic)/I-L is an appropriate title? It's not exactly something you'd find when arriving here! The Rambling Man (talk) 16:53, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

I believe that the title is aptly named. I used the simplest word for alphabetic that I could find, so I doubt it could be any simpler than that. Cheers, Razorflame 18:29, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Compare it to the en-wiki list of Latin phrases - this is split into smaller alphabetically ordered lists, using the titles such as "List of Latin phrases (A–E) " - I think the titles would be better off as "List of rivers of Romania (I–L)". What do you think? The Rambling Man (talk) 08:12, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I believe that those titles are better. Cheers, Razorflame 14:55, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

I would have to agree. The layout of the title is a bit awkward. If you are stating the leters used, the term alphabetical is usually commonly accepted and not needed in the title and the "/" can just get confusing unless dealing with sub-folders. Also, some of the groupings could use to be split into smaller sections where multiple letters are combined into articles over 50K. Redoing the layouts of many of them from 4 to 3 columns (4 is terrible on smaller/1024 screens) show a couple of them that could realy do with single lettering or even split groupings such as with the V's. -- Creol(talk) 08:36, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

I know that they could easily be split into smaller sections as I've already done with the letter V, but if you believe that they can be split down even further, be my guest :). One other thing that I don't know how to do is the 3 column thing. If you would like to split them from 4 columns down to 3 for me, that would be great. Cheers, Razorflame 14:55, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

And what about renaming the articles as suggested? The Rambling Man (talk) 15:22, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Will do that now. Can you mark the redirects I make for deletion please? Cheers, Razorflame 15:22, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Not a problem. Done. Have you changed the navigational template to avoid the redirects? The Rambling Man (talk) 15:30, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

 Done cheers, Razorflame 15:36, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Email...

I just added an Email address, just for you :) Cheers -- AmericanEagle 00:11, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Alright. Cheers, Razorflame 14:55, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikiproject Good articles

Hi, Razorflame, Welcome to Wikiproject Good articles! Thank you for your changes. If you need help, check out the Talk page of our Wikiproject, or leave a message on my talk page. Anyway, Welcome! -- AmericanEagle 02:20, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Like it? Just for fun. -- AmericanEagle 02:20, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

). Nice job with the template! Cheers, Razorflame 14:56, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

NPOV

I was just about to post my opinions when you replied. Well, I posted it now, and I hope that the information which I've given is good enough. Sorry for that. I still need to get the hang of wikipedia.

Djb26 (talk) 20:14, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

I wasn't chastising you! Please don't take things all that seriously :)! Thanks to you, I was able to add a notice to the Template:NPOV page about providing rationale when you use the template. You did the right thing, so don't worry about it! Cheers, Razorflame 20:16, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Re:BD

Thanks. It's funny how different things are here. Malinaccier (talk) 23:43, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Not a problem! Enjoy your time here! Cheers, Razorflame 23:44, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Question:What job/task would you say is in highest demand here on Simple? Malinaccier (talk) 23:49, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Article cleanup and creation are among the most pressing of needs currently on the Simple English Wikipedia. I have been doing my best to create pages here, but sometimes, it isn't quite enough..Cheers, Razorflame 23:50, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

RfA

I'm working on a response... -- AmericanEagle 23:50, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Your message is what I was looking for when I posted this message to ChristianMan16 about ER I wanted to know that. The more I learn on here, the more I learn I have so much more to learn. I have learned very much about what policies and such we have, and other rules and such, but some things (especially our html code and such) I just don't understand yet. I was hoping to be able to become an Admin at the wanted time (about three months), so when I saw the message he gave me I didn't want to jump in and hope for the best, I wanted to see what others though of the idea. And like I said, I didn't want to become you :) I thank you for your message and I will ask him that he not nom me right now. Blessings -- AmericanEagle 00:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Hello

Hello reimber me? XD

Runningblader, Proud owner of OGame artical 01:46, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes. Cheers, Razorflame 03:01, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks a lot for your consideration. However this is a bad point of time, as school in Germany will restart on Monday and I'll go through several hot weeks of exams, where I will basically not edit. Then the summer holidays, where I'll be in Italy, France or working. After that might consider it, but thanks anyway. The life of brian (talk) 14:24, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Not a problem! Cheers, Razorflame 14:25, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Response

I will, and really have. Still I thought it was very strange. Maybe I was that way to when I started. On the other hand, another user just said it up front. I thought your comment below it was very humorous :) Cheers -- AmericanEagle 20:10, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Still have no idea what you mean by this after several hours of thinking. Cheers, Razorflame 18:52, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Reviewing blocks

This edit disturbs me. Only administrators should be dealing with accepting or declining unblock requests. Commenting about requests is one thing, but reviewing and deciding what should happen when you do not have access to the tools is something you should not be doing. The {{unblock}} template specifically points out (paraphrased for the most part) Administrator: do this, that and the other thing if you disagree and do this if you agree. As the {{unblock reviewed}} template states that Administrators have reviewed the block, using it is pretty much saying that you are an administrator, you reviewed the block, and you are declining the requests. As you are not one, you should not be saying this to anyone. -- Creol(talk) 06:57, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

I realize that I am not an administrator, but since nobody had replied to the request in several days, I decided to review the block because of the apparent lack of administrator interest. I realize that I should not have done that, and I am sorry if I offended anyone by doing this. I feel very embarrassed about it and I will not do it again. Cheers, Razorflame 13:56, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

doppleganger?

Hi there Razorflame. What's a doppleganger? I looked on the page for it, but it wasn't easy to understand. you know, just wondering. IuseRosary? ^(talk) 14:42, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

A doppleganger is an account that is solely created to prevent impersonation by vandals who love impersonating administrators. They are not meant to be used for editing. Cheers, Razorflame 15:20, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Oh right, have you had impersonation accounts made then recently? And, I thought your last RFA got withdrawn? Are you an admin? IuseRosary? ^(talk) 15:28, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

No, I am not an administrator. Cheers, Razorflame 15:29, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Oh cool. Well thank-you for explaining it to me  : ) IuseRosary? ^(talk) 15:30, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Not a problem. Cheers, Razorflame 18:51, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Thankyou very much

For the lovely greeting! It is nice to be welcomed to this part of the wikiproject. I am also very impressed by your number of changes made! Scanna (talk) 16:21, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Not a problem, cheers, Razorflame 18:51, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

RfA

Sorry I was away. I would have voted for you. Let me know when you have another RfA. - Terry (talk) 17:08, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Not a problem. I would probably not count on an RfA for at least 3-6 months from now. Other than that, cheers, Razorflame 18:50, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

I had just noticed my mistake, I was just reverting it when I saw you had. Thanks -- AmericanEagle 19:02, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Which mistake was that? Cheers, Razorflame 19:02, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Let me see... -- AmericanEagle 19:03, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

According to the move log, you didn't move it, Terry did, so you made no mistake. Cheers, Razorflame 19:04, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

I meant to change ethene to a Redirect but I had the names mixed up. My poor page... -- AmericanEagle 19:10, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

I thought you put the warning as a joke for my first vandalism. -- AmericanEagle 19:19, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Absolutely not! I never joke around here on the Simple English Wikipedia! I would never do something like that to you. Cheers, Razorflame 19:20, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

When I saw the battle of my page I thought you had started it and I kept seeing you put the message on. I was thinking "did someone figure out his password or something?" Cheers -- AmericanEagle 19:23, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Wasn't me putting the message on. Was MDCCIX. I was reverting his changes, so it could have made it seem like I was putting it back on. Cheers, Razorflame 19:31, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

I know. Cheers -- AmericanEagle 19:31, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

hi

whats up. Baseball16 ^{Talk to me My Edits} 21:05, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Why did you insert the {{Romanian rivers}} into your message? And hi! Razorflame 20:58, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Ethene

Ethene - Please go to this page and look at what I've wrote. --Terry (talk) 16:25, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Question

I saw your oppose on TerryfaeScotland's RFA, and was wondering what the loose guidelines are for Adminship on Simple (besides what I could find on Wikipedia:Criteria for Administratorship)? Malinaccier (talk) 20:04, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

I can only answer this for my own things that I look for in a candidate.

I look for the following in a candidate (in question form):

1. Does this candidate understand the policies at Simple?
2. Does this candidate help fight vandalism at Simple?
3. Is the candidate active?
4. Does this candidate actively help build the Wikipedia?
5. Does this candidate know what he/she is doing at Simple?
6. Does the candidate have a need for the tools?

These are the most important questions that I look for in a candidate before I support a nomination. Cheers, Razorflame 20:58, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks a lot (and for the barnstar)! Malinaccier (talk) 21:16, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Not a problem! Cheers, Razorflame 01:14, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

WP:PVGA

Can you take a second look at the discussion there? Thanks, Maxim_(talk) 01:08, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

I've looked over the discussion and have found that nothing has changed since the last time I looked at it earlier this week. I've added a comment that states that I won't change my vote until someone other than you (not intending any offense, I just need another user's opinion outside of yours because you are the person who is wanting that article to be promoted) gives me their opinion on whether or not the article has reached the comprehension needed. Cheers, Razorflame 01:14, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Hmm.

You know, everyone is assuming I'm the same person... ;) · AndonicO ^Engage. 17:33, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Why wouldn't you be the same person as the one over on the English Wikipedia? Cheers, Razorflame 17:34, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Well, I could be an impostor (I'm not, thankfully—err, I think I'm not...). ;) · AndonicO ^Engage. 18:12, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Please make a null edit on your English Wikipedia account to confirm your identity. Thanks, Razorflame 18:16, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

>.< I was going to point you to WP:NOT, but I see the simple English version doesn't say "Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy..." · AndonicO ^Engage. 20:32, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Assuming

Don't mean to chastise, but you shouldn't have. --Gwib ^-(talk)- 17:49, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

If you look back in the archives, you'll see that Eptalon has done the same in the past. Cheers, Razorflame 17:51, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

[1]. --Gwib ^-(talk)- 18:00, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

I saw. Cheers, Razorflame 18:01, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Re:Question

It would be much easier to just do one column...To do three columns I would have to count out each individual river...If you know the number of rivers for each page I could do it......Malinaccier (talk) 19:12, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

The reason why I asked if you would be willing to do this is because all of the other lists are 3 columns, so to keep it in line with the other lists, it would have to be 3 columns. Cheers, Razorflame 19:45, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

I understand that, it's just that I would need the number of rivers in each to split them evently. Malinaccier (talk) 19:48, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Alright, I'll see what I can do. Razorflame 19:53, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

If you weren't happy with 4 columns, all you had to do was ask me to change it.. --Gwib ^-(talk)- 19:52, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

I didn't want to insult you by telling you that 3 columns is what all of the other pages use. Sorry for not being so informative. Cheers, Razorflame 19:53, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

E-mail

U iz haz teh e-meil. Maxim_(talk) 20:26, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Alright, will check now. Thanks for letting me know. Cheers, Razorflame 20:28, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

U iz teh velkom. Maxim_(talk) 20:31, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Hold on. Will get to you shortly. Razorflame 20:44, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Here is what I look for in a potential administrator:

I look for the following in a candidate (in question form):

1. Does this candidate understand the policies at Simple?
2. Does this candidate help fight vandalism at Simple?
3. Is the candidate active?
4. Does this candidate actively help build the Wikipedia?
5. Does this candidate know what he/she is doing at Simple?
6. Does the candidate have a need for the tools?

I can only answer this question for myself, so therefore, you might have to ask others to get what they look for in a candidate. I would also recommend you reread Wikipedia:Criteria for Administratorship again just to make sure you meet all of the requirements. Razorflame 20:45, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar!

		The Barnstar of Romanian National Merit
		For your hard work on Romania-related pages.--♠  Lights  talk  00:14, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Yay! Cheers, Razorflame 00:44, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Question.

I belive you said "Artical copys form en wikipedia is frowned upon here" and i think you made several river articals copys from en?

Runningblader, Proud Maker of OGame artical 00:21, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

P.S Seeing if you reimber as well :)

lol proof--> It is a direct copypaste from the English Wikipedia, and this is frowned upon here. Razorflame 01:55, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Runningblader, Proud Maker of OGame artical 00:22, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

They are not direct copypastes. In fact, most of the river articles that I create are very close to the English Wikipedia articles, however, there is a reason for that. The reason for that is this:

• I have permission from the creators of the articles over on the English Wikipedia to port them over here.
• They can't be simplified any further.

Cheers, Razorflame 00:44, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Ok

Runningblader, Proud Maker of OGame artical 00:53, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Mess.

You sure do leave a lot of redlinks :P well i'll clean them up

Runningblader, Proud Maker of OGame artical 02:16, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

No, you won't. I am taking care of them after I finish the expansion of the article. Cheers, Razorflame 02:20, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Why? There mess ups =\

Runningblader, Proud Maker of OGame artical 02:23, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Because they are not mess-ups. They are there for a reason. Please read the message that I left on your talk page just a moment ago. Thanks, Razorflame 02:24, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Warning.

I am adding somthing to Romania I'm messaging you this so your messed up Runningblader, Proud Maker of OGame artical 02:51, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Feel free to add something to Romania as I am done with the expansion. Razorflame 02:53, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

RE:artical

sorry

Runningblader, Proud Maker of OGame artical 03:15, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Question.

Why don't you try out to become admin? You should have a lot of Main space edits.

Runningblader, Proud Maker of OGame artical 14:38, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Just ran a few weeks ago. Razorflame 15:09, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

So your an admin? Or no? If your not why?

Runningblader,In Anti-Vandlism Project 20:28, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

P.S Please see My reveiw Runningblader,In Anti-Vandlism Project 20:28, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

I am not an administrator. For the reasons why, look in the archives of Wikipedia:Requests for adminship. Razorflame 14:54, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

invite

I was wondering if you wished to join [User:Wikiproject Anti-Vandlism|Wikiproject Anti-Vandlism]].

Wikiproject Anti-Vandlism (talk) 02:44, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: Good job!

Thank you. Glad to be here! TransUtopian (talk) 15:14, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

If you stay here long enough, you will see that I am one of the main contributors to this site, with nearly 1,800 articles under my belt! If you need anything, please let me know here. Cheers, Razorflame 15:16, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

QD

Careful, it was a legitimate page. --Gwib ^-(talk)- 15:33, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

How can you say that it was a mistake QD when it was you yourself that deleted it in the first place? Razorflame 15:35, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Because it was. I decided to check (luckily) in the past edits after deleting it and saw it was a legitimate article. It was only an inattentive moment on my part that got it deleted, but you had originally put the tag on it. --Gwib ^-(talk)- 16:00, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

I put the tag on it because it was created as a vandalism article. There was absolutely no redeeming content to it. I also checked the edit history and found that it was created as such. There was no way that that was a mistake QD. Razorflame 16:02, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

You might have to be an admin to view these, but here were the deleted edits made to the article: [2]. --Gwib ^-(talk)- 16:04, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

You have to be an administrator to view deleted edits. Maybe a copypaste? Cheers, Razorflame 16:06, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

All I saw was that he created a new page so therefore, I automatically marked it as a vandalism article. I guess it could've been a mistake, but since I am not able to see deleted edits, then therefore I should not be punished by having my QD marked as a mistake QD. Razorflame 16:11, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Couldn't you see the "Warning! This title has been deleted by an admin! View or restore 16 deleted edits" at the top? --Gwib ^-(talk)- 16:13, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Ummm..nope? The only thing I saw was a vandal article. Razorflame 16:23, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Then forgive me for chastising you, I thought 'regular' users could see the "View or restore 16 deleted edits" tag. --Gwib ^-(talk)- 16:25, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

I do not believe that anyone but administrators could view deleted edits or restore pages', no? And don't worry, I'm a bit used to it :) Razorflame 16:33, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

re:Welcome back!

Thanks! I hope so too. My internet died for almost a month with no warning, and I still am having trouble with it, so I've got my fingers crossed that I don't vanish again. Again, thanks for the welcome back :)TheWolf 17:59, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Not a problem! Cheers, Razorflame 18:30, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Protection

Here, if you want instances from which to protect pages indefinitely, this would be one. Constant vandalism on one specific page begs a protection until the vandalism is over. --Gwib ^-(talk)- 19:18, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

According to en:Wikipedia:Blocking policy, that would've been a temporary semi-protection. Continuous vandalism to a single article from a variety of users equals a temporary semi-protection. In this case, however, I believe a temporary full protection would have been a better choice because we were dealing with auto-confirmed users. In either situation, I would've only protected it for a few hours, not indefinitely. Cheers, Razorflame 19:28, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Semi-protect would have had no effect on the amount of vandalism to the page, since all users were 'confirmed'. However, they were also being created sporadically, some one after the other, some 10 minutes apart. An indef full protect for indefinite amounts of vandalism was the best choice. --Gwib ^-(talk)- 20:49, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

I realize that a semi-protection in that instance would've been unhelpful because I realized that all of the users were auto-confirmed. However, since you took off the indefinite full protection several hours after you put it on there in the first place, a temporary full protection would've been the best choice in my opinion. Cheers, Razorflame 14:53, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

RE: Charles Spurgeon

I have been working so much even since it became a GA, see Here. I see your on, so what is your opionion on me noming it for a Proposed very good article? What do you think about it? Cheers --  ✰AmericanEagle  19:59, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

I would have to say that since it just became a good article that it would probably be a better idea to wait a while before proposing it as a VGA. Cheers, Razorflame 20:03, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

I think that I get what you mean, but if it was ready (I have expanded and worked on it so much over the last couple of days), shouldn't it be proposed. Even if it will stay there until it is ready? Cheers --  ✰AmericanEagle  20:13, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

To tell you the truth, I don't think it is ready. I believe that it could be more comprehensive. Cheers, Razorflame 20:13, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

That's what I was asking. Thanks --  ✰AmericanEagle  20:17, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Cheers, Razorflame 15:16, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

thanks for the barnstar

Thanks a load. (You'll certainly get one, when you get through with the romanian rivers...). Cheers The life of brian (talk) 20:01, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

I highly doubt that I will be done with the rivers anytime soon (there are 8,324 articles in the category en:Category:Rivers of Romania. Cheers, Razorflame 20:04, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Well who knows with you....^^. Didn't know that Romania had so many rivers...well anyway you'll get it now

Congratulations: You have been given a Barnstar! For taking on the sheer impossible task of completing the romanian river section. The life of brian (talk) 20:13, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Cheers, Razorflame 20:14, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Open Proxy

Yes, thank you for asking. Many of the IP address used are Open Proxies, and in case of blatant vandalism, the WMF Policy, #5 permits to block and further trace the offending IP Address. Ciao, M7 (talk) 15:27, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Good. Cheers, Razorflame 15:29, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Good lord!

Where did your userpage go? mC⁸ 16:21, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Nowhere. According to my page, it still exists. Cheers, Razorflame 16:22, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Rivers...

I see your still working on those rivers. But why? Do you like live near them or something? I bet your just trying to boost up your article totals to say you've created the most. But really, what is your purpose? 8,000+? Cheers --  ✰AmericanEagle  16:22, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Nope. I like Romania as I want to learn Romanian, so I am creating them to help me learn more about Romania. Cheers, Razorflame 16:23, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Alright, cheers --  ✰AmericanEagle  16:32, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Not a problem. Razorflame 16:33, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Re:Articles

I know, I just haven't gotten around to it yet. I was concentrating on just writing articles on all of her books, but I guess it doesn't make sense to leave her article redlinked on so many othe articles! I'll get right to it. Malinaccier (talk) 22:46, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Cheers, Razorflame 22:49, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Userboxes in Template: namespace

If you come across a userbox in the Template: namespace, please move it to the author's userspace rather than tagging it for QD. If the userbox in the Template: namespace is a duplicate of a userbox in the author's or another user's namespace, than tag it for QD. Cheers,--♠  Lights  talk  01:20, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Sorry! That's what I meant to do! Cheers, Razorflame 01:33, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

RE:

It's not really that I need a simpler word than another simple word....the Professional wrestling article calls wrestling pretend while some may see it that way it's not entirely true and can be seen as offensive to Wrestling fans. I'm trying to find a less offensive word.--  † ChristianMan16  03:59, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

The only word that I can think of that is a little less offensive would be unreal...some other words include not real, informal. Cheers, Razorflame 04:05, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

RE: DEFAULTSORT and BD

I can, I just have one question: When putting the BD template onto an article, does it include all of the other categories Crosby, Fanny (e.g. does it appear the same on the Category:Christians page?) If it does, I'll change it. Cheers --  ✰AmericanEagle  23:11, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Let me check. Razorflame 23:13, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

It appears to work. I'll go through them. Cheers --  ✰AmericanEagle  23:19, 31 May 2008 (UTC)