User talk:RyanCross/Archives/6
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Greetings!
Runningblader has asked you if you want a cookie |
Hey ryan! Haven't talk recently...have we? :) how has it been?-RNBSIG 04:21, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you!!!
Ryan, thanks for showing up. I was about two minutes away from asking a steward for emergency sysop. We've been dealing with this guy (freddy?) all night. Thanks! fr33kman t - c 05:46, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- No problem. Thank you for helping clean up all the vandalism. If it wasn't for you guys, multiple pages would be filled with vandalism. And I thank Versus22 for contacting me on the English Wikipedia to come here. Luckily, I was around there at the time. — RyanCross (talk) 06:34, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Heads-up
You might want to keep an eye on Phentos (talk · contribs), he tends to be unintentionally be POV pushing.-- † CM16 t c r 07:07, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- I'll keep an eye on him, thanks. Though, I may be leaving soon, so if you think he may be going too far, leave a message on WP:AN. — RyanCross (talk) 07:09, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Will do.-- † CM16 t c r 07:11, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Just a note to say thanks, RyanCross/Archives, for your comments and vote in my RFB which closed as successful with 25 supports and no opposes. It is my second unanimous request, which I find astounding. In my previous thanks (from where I stole the code for this one) I promised you I would do my best as an admin. I promise I will continue to do my best as an editor, admin and 'crat, and I won't let you down! Thanks again, Kennedy (talk) 20:57, 23 February 2009 (UTC) |
From ATW
Hello Ryan, I'm the very user under the name Qweedsa at admintools. As you can see, I'm not anyhow active on w:simple:, but I found it worth greeting you here. Good luck in real adminship! :-) Best regards, =p.s.a.= 10:12, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Requested move
I suggest moving trouser to trousers. This move needs an administrator to do it. Thanks. ☺Coppertwig(talk) 14:13, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Done. — RyanCross (talk) 02:16, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
help
I foregot how to get the sigs to work for this... click here for view of the sig Could you help? :)-RNBSIG 00:30, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- Nevermind :) figured it out.-RNBSIG 00:30, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
My RfA
fr33kman talk 02:21, 1 March 2009 (UTC) |
Simple News Issue Three
Issue 4 - 2th March 2009 50,066 editors, 55,989 articles, 130,886 pages. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
Announcements | ♥ | Administrators | ||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
[Subscribe] [Dates] [Discussion] [The Team] |
|
--GoblinBot3 (talk) 22:13, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
User:Englatar8888
Hi Ryan, this user is creating articles ground-up in mainspace bit-by-bit. Petersymonds has made a sandbox for him but he's not using it. I'm going to suggest that he add {{underconstruction}} to them if he's not willing to sandbox these new creations first. Just FYI cause you deleted (rightly) Egbert See you! :) fr33kman talk 23:35, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- First, it was Peterdownunder who suggested his sandbox. ;) It seems Synergy fixes the problem by cleaning up the article, so I think that needs to be done anymore. — RyanCross (talk) 23:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- I was just heading over to say it was Peterdownunder (X_X) I've suggested the tag anyway. Saves people who don't know about the editor from adding QD to it. fr33kman talk 23:47, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- Sounds fine. Thanks. — RyanCross (talk) 23:49, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- I was just heading over to say it was Peterdownunder (X_X) I've suggested the tag anyway. Saves people who don't know about the editor from adding QD to it. fr33kman talk 23:47, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Please join the Typo Team
So, I would like if you could join the Typo Team. It's your choice. --The New Mikemoral♪♪♫ 03:49, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK
I can't believe that my first five DYKs on any wiki all got through! :) [doing a little dance!] Thanks for adding the pic, I should'da thought about doing that :) fr33kman talk 06:51, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- No problem. I was going to put Zeus as the first hook with the image, but the Toronto Subway hook was more interesting, so I made that one the first hook instead, along with the image of the subway. — RyanCross (talk) 07:25, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Simple News Issue Five
Issue 5 - 16th March 2009 52,806 editors, 56,607 articles, 133,001 pages. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
Announcements | ♥ | Administrators | ||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
[Subscribe] [Archives] [Discussion] [The Team] |
|
--GoblinBot3 (talk) 12:47, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK removal
Ryan: why did you remove this hook and not do anything with it? Either way (talk) 03:35, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- Fixed. Read edit summary. — RyanCross (talk) 04:10, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- Those two were connected; it wasn't a formatting thing really. They were both about the same topic, it was just suggested that another hook was needed instead, so that's why it looks like they're two separate nominations. Either way (talk) 20:03, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Help from an admin!
Hey, I'm going to need help from an admin. Considering you're online right now, could you copy the icon code from User:The Obento Musubi/icons.js to MediaWiki:Common.js? Thanks! obentomusubi 06:54, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
- Well, you actually just missed me. Anyway, I've added the code to the page. I hope I did it right... — RyanCross (talk) 10:06, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
- Ahh!!! Thank you so much! Now I can get started overhauling the icon system (per discussion at Simple Talk). Thanks a million! obentomusubi 19:00, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
- Ay, no problem. :-) — RyanCross (talk) 03:36, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- Ahh!!! Thank you so much! Now I can get started overhauling the icon system (per discussion at Simple Talk). Thanks a million! obentomusubi 19:00, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Admin Tools Wiki on Wikia
Just to let you know, there are 3 Requests for rights on ATW that have not been responded to and Rswfan is trying to adopt the wiki because of your inactivity. Please respond on ATW if you see this message. GT5162 (talk) 17:02, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Happy Ryan's Day!
RyanCross has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, Cheers, Fairfield Deleted? 00:00, 8 April 2009 (UTC) A record of your Day will always be kept here. |
- Thank you. :-) — RyanCross (talk) 06:53, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Simple News Issue 6
Issue 6 - 28th April 2009 60,218 editors, 58,333 articles, 138,873 pages. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
Announcements | ♥ | Administrators | ||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
[Subscribe] [Archives] [Discussion] [The Team] |
|
Spam
Barras (talk) 15:18, 9 May 2009 (UTC) |
Re
If you're online, can you get on Gmail? Meetare Shappy Cunkelfratz! 00:32, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Sorry
I'm very sorry I made you cross, Ryan. Love 203.36.44.16 (talk) 06:21, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- Eh... okay then... just don't vandalize... — RyanCross (talk) 06:23, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Picture caption
The top right-hand picture is composed of four separate images, yet it appears that the caption refers to one of these only. — This unsigned comment was added by 70.127.206.112 (talk • changes).
T:TDYK
Why is my nomination of Google in DYK not being moved to next update with the other DYK nominations you moved? Pmlinediter Talk 07:43, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Another reviewer hasn't verified the reference yet. I looked at the nomination and the comments below it, and it seems the only item that was discussed was the complexity, and nothing about the reference verifying the hook. Don't worry, I'm sure someone will review it more thoroughly soon, and then soon after it'll appear on the Main Page. Keep up the nice work. Thanks. — RyanCross (talk) 09:43, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Also, I'm not sure what you mean by "with the other DYK nominations you moved," as the last person to move hooks to the next update was User:Bluegoblin7... am I missing something here? — RyanCross (talk) 09:44, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, Ryan. Cheers! Pmlinediter Talk 09:46, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- No problem... :-) — RyanCross (talk) 09:48, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Was it Bluegoblin7? I thought it was you. Pmlinediter Talk 10:02, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- If you are referring to these hooks, then yes, it was Bluegoblin7. But I did do some formatting after. That's all. — RyanCross (talk) 10:05, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- I was indeed referring to those. Actually, I mistook your formatting with update of hooks. Happy editing! Cheers, Pmlinediter Talk 10:44, 18 May 2009 (UTC).
- If you are referring to these hooks, then yes, it was Bluegoblin7. But I did do some formatting after. That's all. — RyanCross (talk) 10:05, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, Ryan. Cheers! Pmlinediter Talk 09:46, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
(unindent)Can you move 1 hook from T:TDYK (the bottom one, about India which is the earliest) to the next update. Thanks, Pmlinediter Talk 09:01, 24 May 2009 (UTC).
- Hey, did you update DYK today? The previous hooks haven't even been for one day! Though, if we start updating everyday, soon, we'll near en's 6 hour update. The problem is, as Eptalon said that we have too less editors. Just yesterday, User:Mighty Wodan was inactive and it DYK was almost dead. Well, it is pleasing to see enough hooks to update in 1 day, anyway. Pmlinediter Talk 09:10, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm... I guess I wasn't around to notice that was a new rule... I used to update DYK often. Anyway, I just noticed a problem when I was about to add the credits... two hooks have already been previously used! I'll have to revert it to fix this problem... — RyanCross (talk) 09:13, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- I have already added the credits. And regarding the same article contributing 2 hooks, you might take a look at Bluegoblin7's comments here Pmlinediter Talk 09:19, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- I don't understand... when I read it, it seemed like Bluegoblin was talking about wether it was okay to have three articles of places in one update. I don't see him mentioning anything about having two hooks for one article. Am I missing something? — RyanCross (talk) 09:24, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oh yes, you have. See this:-
- I don't understand... when I read it, it seemed like Bluegoblin was talking about wether it was okay to have three articles of places in one update. I don't see him mentioning anything about having two hooks for one article. Am I missing something? — RyanCross (talk) 09:24, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- I have already added the credits. And regarding the same article contributing 2 hooks, you might take a look at Bluegoblin7's comments here Pmlinediter Talk 09:19, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm... I guess I wasn't around to notice that was a new rule... I used to update DYK often. Anyway, I just noticed a problem when I was about to add the credits... two hooks have already been previously used! I'll have to revert it to fix this problem... — RyanCross (talk) 09:13, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
*...that France is the most visited country in the world, with over 82million tourists visiting each year? Kennedy (talk) 13:34, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Again, good idea. Pmlinediter Talk 14:06, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- France has already appeared on DYK. :-/ Meetare Shappy Cunkelfratz! 20:21, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- So we can't have it twice at all? Kennedy (talk) 20:57, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- But that's fine. We need hooks for DYK and it doesn't matter if it is from an article already used.
Let us keep the limit to two. Three would be overdoing it.Cheers, Pmlinediter Talk 07:43, 21 May 2009 (UTC).
- Comment: There never has been a limit on the number of times a hook can appear, and let's not start now! We're in dire need of hooks! I think personally we should just limit it to the same article cannot be in the same or consecutive updates... thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluegoblin7 (talk • contribs)
- I don't see why we can't have it again. Yotcmdr =talk to the commander= 10:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, Bluegoblin7's idea seems just fine for we need hooks here but that does not mean that the same article will be used in consecutive updates. Pmlinediter Talk 15:04, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Pmlinediter Talk 09:29, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, I was looking at a different comment (silly me). That sounds fine... maybe we should add it to the rules? I'll do that now... — RyanCross (talk) 09:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
(unindent)Yes you might. (I must reduce my overuse of User talk namespace. I have got 34% contribs there and only 28% in the main namespace). Pmlinediter Talk 09:36, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Done. Thanks for your help! (Here's a tip: Don't reply to this message!) — RyanCross (talk) 09:37, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks!
Flower jokes aside, thank you for nominating me. :-) Meetare Shappy Cunkelfratz! 22:32, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- No problemo. I'm very proud of you. :-) Welcome to the admin team! — RyanCross (talk) 22:35, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
DYK
Why is the DYK updated so soon? My article was only on there for less then a day, which otherwise would have been more then a week! Mighty Wodan (talk) 09:44, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- [1] — RyanCross (talk) 09:44, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- I would prefer if you keep cool and not get so excited about everything. It was done basically because we had a backlog of 5 in Next Update and 4 in T:TDYK. I think that it will be good for Simple if DYK is updated frequently and the last thing I wan't is a frequent DYK contributer opposing this. Pmlinediter Talk 09:46, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Was there discussion about this somewhere? Because I'm for whatever the community has decided... — RyanCross (talk) 09:48, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- I would prefer if you keep cool and not get so excited about everything. It was done basically because we had a backlog of 5 in Next Update and 4 in T:TDYK. I think that it will be good for Simple if DYK is updated frequently and the last thing I wan't is a frequent DYK contributer opposing this. Pmlinediter Talk 09:46, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- I just want my article to stay on the main page as long as any other article used to be (which would be a week). I think we are not ready to update very frequently and I think that if the articles stay on the main page so short they will not receive the attention they would otherwise have. If articles are on the main page for a week, people will edit them, expand them, and they can then be brought to GA more easily. My article, aswell as the others, do not have that oppurtunity now. Mighty Wodan (talk) 09:51, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Does anyone of you think that the DYKs get any attention from anyone other than the 28-odd active editors here? Seriously, if a DYK has to go to PGA, one of these editors will do so and I'm sure that all of them have seen the DYKs. Besides, at Simple, the system is quite different for here even GAs can become DYK candidates. And I really have my doubts whether the community wants the dYK to get real slow like 10 days, In fact, Bluegoblin7 who suggested the ten day update said something about a 3 day update just yesterday here. Pmlinediter Talk 10:03, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Soon, yes, we will be able to decrease the 7 - 10 day update to maybe 3, and eventually everyday updates if we gain more active participants at DYK. I would like to decrease it, but I'm fine with whatever the community decides, and it sounds like for now we'll stick to the weekly rule... maybe by next month we can try to decrease it? Let's not go too quickly through things now. Also, does Bluegonlin run DYK alone? No, he doesn't, it's the community's decision whether or not to change the rules, so just because he suggested the three-day update rule, doesn't mean we rush to go with it. For now, just be patient... patience is key. I'd leave it alone at least for a little while longer, and then maybe a proposal can be started to decrease it. Sounds good? Oh, and by the way, a few months ago, the rule was actually to update DYK whenever it was ready to be updated, but after thinking, it's better for updates to be in the spotlight for the same amount of time... to be fair of course. That's why I just reverted the update I did. — RyanCross (talk) 10:46, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Bluegoblin7 does not run Simple. My point is that the same user who said that the time period must be increased to 10 days has said that he wants a 3 day update. And talking of community, can you please provide a link where the community has extended the update period to 10 days. OK ,fine, I'll be patient, but the point is that I think that Simple must be improved. I have no problem whatsoever with 10 day/7 day updates. However, I want everything in Simple to be as good as any other wiki. Pmlinediter Talk 10:53, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Thought I would jump in, good job I stalk most talk pages on this wiki - it would be polite to let me know btw. No, I don't own anything, nor have I ever claimed too. You will note that things that I refer to are generally backed up with discussion, and if not I try and make one. I would like a three-day update - or less - but at this time a 3 day update is not feasible - we need to get a regular "backlog" going (and no, a backlog is not 9 hooks, that's 1 and 4/5ths of an update imho). Do you get what i'm saying? Ok,points made. I shall be around if you need me, but i'm going to steer clear from DYK for a while if i'm causing controversy (as this thread seems). Regards, Goblin 22:15, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Bluegoblin7 does not run Simple. My point is that the same user who said that the time period must be increased to 10 days has said that he wants a 3 day update. And talking of community, can you please provide a link where the community has extended the update period to 10 days. OK ,fine, I'll be patient, but the point is that I think that Simple must be improved. I have no problem whatsoever with 10 day/7 day updates. However, I want everything in Simple to be as good as any other wiki. Pmlinediter Talk 10:53, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Soon, yes, we will be able to decrease the 7 - 10 day update to maybe 3, and eventually everyday updates if we gain more active participants at DYK. I would like to decrease it, but I'm fine with whatever the community decides, and it sounds like for now we'll stick to the weekly rule... maybe by next month we can try to decrease it? Let's not go too quickly through things now. Also, does Bluegonlin run DYK alone? No, he doesn't, it's the community's decision whether or not to change the rules, so just because he suggested the three-day update rule, doesn't mean we rush to go with it. For now, just be patient... patience is key. I'd leave it alone at least for a little while longer, and then maybe a proposal can be started to decrease it. Sounds good? Oh, and by the way, a few months ago, the rule was actually to update DYK whenever it was ready to be updated, but after thinking, it's better for updates to be in the spotlight for the same amount of time... to be fair of course. That's why I just reverted the update I did. — RyanCross (talk) 10:46, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Does anyone of you think that the DYKs get any attention from anyone other than the 28-odd active editors here? Seriously, if a DYK has to go to PGA, one of these editors will do so and I'm sure that all of them have seen the DYKs. Besides, at Simple, the system is quite different for here even GAs can become DYK candidates. And I really have my doubts whether the community wants the dYK to get real slow like 10 days, In fact, Bluegoblin7 who suggested the ten day update said something about a 3 day update just yesterday here. Pmlinediter Talk 10:03, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Simple News Issue 7
Issue 7 - 8th June 2009 67,135 editors, 59,528 articles, 143,118 pages. | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Announcements | ♥ | Administrators | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
[Subscribe] [Archives] [Discussion] [The Team] |
|
Simple News Issue 8
Issue 8 - 22th June 2009 69,053 editors, 59,757 articles, 144,395 pages. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
Announcements | ♥ | Administrators | ||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
[Subscribe] [Issues] [Discussion] [The Team] |
|
Goblin 10:52, 22 June 2009 (UTC) I ♥ Kennedy!
Block templates
You might want to take a look at your message at User talk:62.171.198.10 - your message says you gave an indef block, while the block log shows only a 24 hour block. Perhaps you meant to user {{uw-block2}}, not {{uw-block3}}? --Philosopher Let us reason together. 04:13, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, I guess I haven't issued a block in a while... fixed. — RyanCross (talk) 21:31, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Simple News Edition 9
Issue 9 - 23rd November 2024 1,526,481 editors, 260,322 articles, 852,975 pages. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Announcements | ♥ | Administrators | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
|
[Subscribe] [Archives] [Discussion] [The Team] |
|
Yotcmdr =talk to the commander= 08:13, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Simple News Issue 10
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
Song of the Fortnight |
|
My RfB
I promise to do my best and justify the trust the community has placed in me! fr33kman talk 20:36, 21 July 2009 (UTC) |
Simple News: Issue Eleven
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
Pmlineditor 10:27, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Hey RyRy
I gotta say, I've got a warm feeling in my chest just to see you editing here again!!! :) I've been told I missed you on IRC yesterday. Oh well! :) CU fr33kman talk 06:47, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- Heh, it's good to be back. I basically took the summer off from Wikipedia and wanted to spend more time in real life, so I did, had a great time, and now I think I'll be more active again. Nice to see everyone is still around, and a couple of new faces here and there I see. Anyway, thanks for the the comment. :-) — RyanCross (talk) 06:55, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- NP! I took the last six weeks off for the same reasons! Gotta deal with real-life on occasion! :) CU around! :) fr33kman talk 07:05, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
WP:RULES
Can you show me the rule that says a sub-stub of Dodger Stadium is better than a redirect to Los Angeles Dodgers? That may be what you like better, but I don't think it's a rule. There is a page called WP:OWN which maybe you should read. Thanks. Jokestress (talk) 20:20, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Quick deletion of Dodger Stadium
Just got this from User:Bluegoblin7.
- The page you wrote, Dodger Stadium, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was a page that had no content. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Goblin 20:33, 11 October 2009 (UTC) I ♥ GoblinBots! 20:33, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Maybe you two should talk. Jokestress (talk) 20:37, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Simple News Issue 12
| ||||||||
|
|
Simple News Issue 13
| ||||||||
|
|
Administrator
Hi, how do you become an administrator?
Simple News Issue 14
| ||||||||
|
|
Simple News Issue 15
| ||||||
|
|
Yottie =talk= 20:12, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Simple News Issue 16
| ||||||
|
|
Terrible move on deletion
There are several categories of stub-sorting...bio-stub, tech-stub, us-stub. On that note, please speedily undelete biz-stub. Purplebackpack89 (Notes Taken) (Locker) 06:11, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Done. Sorry for the inconvenience, it's been a while since I've been at this wiki. — RyanCross (talk) 06:16, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, it sure is RyRy, but it is also really nice to see you here! :) fr33kman 06:25, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Gosh, I was actually thinking I would get some type of comment like that from you. ;) But I don't know if I'm coming back 100%... maybe just edits and actions here and there... I have to get used to everything again! — RyanCross (talk) 06:33, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- w/e, it doesn't matter if you stick around or not, it's just nice to see you period! :) fr33kman 07:08, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Hi there, Ryan :) Cheers, Razorflame 07:06, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Ahh, well I'm glad to hear from both of you. ;) — RyanCross (talk) 08:35, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Gosh, I was actually thinking I would get some type of comment like that from you. ;) But I don't know if I'm coming back 100%... maybe just edits and actions here and there... I have to get used to everything again! — RyanCross (talk) 06:33, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Simple News: Issue Seventeen
| ||||||||
|
|
Simple News: Issue Eighteen
| ||||||||||||
|
|
Admin Tools Wiki
Hi, I'm Hamtechperson, with a home wiki of en.wikipedia. I use the username Planeswalker1 over on Wikia. I wanted to ask you if you could look at the RfA I placed on the admin tools wiki. Thanks! Planeswalker1/Hamtechperson (talk) 04:08, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Simple News: Issue Nineteen
| ||||||||||||
|
|
PmlineditorBot (report errors) 11:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Simple News Issue 20
| ||||||||||
|
|
Simple News Issue 21
| ||||||||
|
|
Hi, Ryancross!
Hello, Ryancross! I just wanted to drop in and tell you how nice it is to see you back here again! We really need more people like you. I'm sorry to sully a fresh, clean new talk page with arrant nonsense :P.
Mmm - Milk! | ||
A tall, cool glass of milk just for you! Milk somehow promotes WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a glass of milk, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy! |
Welcome back and God bless, Classical Esther♣ 22:46, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you, and I like milk!.. ;) — RyanCross (talk) 01:19, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Help
If you have time, could you please write Rule 5 Draft? I know it's a very important concept in baseball, but I don't know how to write it in Simple English. Rin tin tin (talk) 11:42, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.