SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 3 days.

Current requests for rollback

I've been reverting loads of vandalism with WP:TWINKLE and I've been editing a while so I think I am ready for rollbacker perms Ieditrandomarticles (talk | contribs) 01:11, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Ieditrandomarticles: Like to see more reverts, per this. But we will see what an admin says. --Cactus🌵 spiky 12:32, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'll leave this for another admin to decide, but I will note your first edit here was about 2 months ago, although I haven't found any issues with your edits (minus the "Orange cat funny" incident) I still feel like rollbackers should be around for a bit longer.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 09:39, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
My first edit here was in January 20th, which was 5 months ago (see here). Ieditrandomarticles (talk | contribs) 01:18, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Huh, still not sure if I'd give the flag but I'm certainly more satisfied with your time spent editing here.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 09:50, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I currently use Twinkle and the Undo option to revert destructive edits. I would be better able to continue doing this if rollback was enabled for me. Qeox(Talk) 21:36, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You have exactly 18 reverts here? Would like to see more reverts. --Cactus🌵 spiky 07:50, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I feel that fighting vandalism is also beneficial for Wikipedia, in addition to writing articles. I have recently found more free time and can work more focused on the topic of fighting vandalism. This access makes it faster for me to do this work. Qeox(Talk) 09:02, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]