Quick deletion of Broad On change

 

The page you wrote, Broad On, has been selected for quick deletion. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. You can find more information about the reason here. DIVINE (talk) 15:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

SO DIY 165.155.138.9 (talk) 23:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Stop Creating Pages And Look At The Issue Your Being Told About change

Look at some of your recently created pages. They violate a whole lot of policies. Please slow down, read those policies, fix your articles, and don't make new ones violating them Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 00:28, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

bruh i dont know how to fix them you help fix them i just wanted to help. :( 165.155.138.9 (talk) 23:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Look at some of them. Theres this things on top of a lot of them saying there are many issues. Take a look at what they are, read the links, and fix them. I'll try to fix some in a bit, but ultimately if you create an article, you should create preferably create it without major problems Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 23:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
how to make it longer? 165.155.138.9 (talk) 23:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
and what to add to the pages like more information or give sources 165.155.138.9 (talk) 23:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
So, first of all, length is actually not that big of an issue (but more good content is always better!). For example, take a look at your article Broad On. Here's some stuff you could easily fix. First, the article doesn't link to anything. That's easy, put in a relevant link. Second, nothing links to the article. That's easy, put a relevant link in another, related, article. It has no sources. Great, add a reliable source. It has original research. Great, put a source to show that it isn't original research, and remove anything that is. If you want to expand the article, simply find relevant information, and add it with reliable sources Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 23:27, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
DIY. 165.155.138.9 (talk) 23:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Do It Yourself (which is what I assume that means), generally applies to the person who wants something done (in this case you, presumably, want the article to exist) or the person who caused issue. That's you Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 23:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
yes 165.155.138.9 (talk) 23:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
so to make it longer add sources or more information? 165.155.138.9 (talk) 23:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
but some of the pages are already short. 165.155.138.9 (talk) 23:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
and some of them i didnt make. 165.155.138.9 (talk) 23:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
You don't need to make every wikipedia article perfect. I just left this notice because you created a bunch of pages with a bunch of problems. Theres no requirement you fix every article Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 23:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
im sorry :( 165.155.138.9 (talk) 23:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
For what? It's okay, we all make mistakes. In fact, I've gotten blocked for some of my mistakes at enwiki. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 23:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
thank you 165.155.138.9 (talk) 23:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Your welcome. Have a nice day! Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 23:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yes, but you need to add sources for every information you add, or is already there. Just adding more unsourced, possibly original research, information isn't that helpful. Also you should probably consider some of my other suggestions Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 23:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
ok. 165.155.138.9 (talk) 23:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply