We don't allow image uploads here. Thanks, Razorflame 06:30, 18 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your new changes are vandalism and this is not acceptable on any Wikipedia. Please stop. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from changing Wikipedia. Razorflame 06:32, 18 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your recent changes are vandalism, and this shows that you want to harm Wikipedia. This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from changing Wikipedia. Razorflame 06:35, 18 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mr._Kruzkin~simplewiki (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)


Request reason:

Once again, I have been blocked for absolutely no reason. After the liberal hacks on regular Wikipedia blocked me for giving facts, I thought that these people would have more brains to understand the truth. But, alas, they don't. This website has also been infiltrated by liberal hacks. My images were reasonable and real, and my edits were entirely truthful. There is no reason for this unjust block whatsoever. Please unblock me at once. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Your edits are vandalism, and calling us liberal hacks is not helping your case. -- Either way (talk) 21:44, 18 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mr._Kruzkin~simplewiki (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)


Request reason:

Another liberal hack screws me over again. Every time a liberal adds information, it's valid and true, even when it's uncited. Every time a conservative adds information, it is always "vandalism," even if there is a citation. I am adding the truth to these articles. The guy with Anderson Cooper is confirmed to be Julio Cesar Recio, who has been verified to be in a romantic relationship with Cooper. For crying out loud, they live in the same apartment. The picture of Al Gore is more up to date and thus more accurate, especially since it shows him doing something and not just standing there. Thus, my edits were not vandalism, but were done to improve Simple English Wikipedia. Sadly, though, it has been just as infiltrated as regular Wikipedia with political agendas. I pray that some reasonable, legitimate editor would review my request and unblock me, and indefinitely block any liberal hacks who are trying to screw up this website. Thank you, may God bless you, and may God bless America!

Decline reason:

Your edits are vandalism, and this is an encyclopedia; official portraits should be used whenever available, thank you. --Chenzw  Talk  06:45, 19 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mr._Kruzkin~simplewiki (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)


Request reason:

Please see above reason. I am also requesting an indefinite block be placed on User:Razorflame. Thank you, may God bless you, and may God bless America!

Decline reason:

No, see the reasons above. Razorflame will not be indefinitely blocked. Unblock declined, and talk page editing disabled. -- Fairfield Deleted? 01:46, 21 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your account will be renamed change

08:42, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed change

10:51, 19 April 2015 (UTC)