The Network Watchdog

RfD nomination of SparkCash

An editor has requested deletion of SparkCash, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2015/SparkCash and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Krett12 (talk) 16:13, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

This

I don't understand what you mean in the summary--could you explain it? However, because I assume good faith I won't revert it. Krett12 (talk) 16:24, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

When the author blanks and Qd's a page that is up for RfD, you don't QD the discussion page. Instead, an admin will close the discussion early as either Speedy delete, consensus not needed or something like that. The watchdog of networks (Woof! Woof!) 16:27, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

I know how rfds work, I just didn't understand the summary. Krett12 (talk) 16:28, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

The summary is basically saying that you don't need to QD the discussion page just because I blanked the article in question. The watchdog of networks (Woof! Woof!) 16:29, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

And please stop socking. We can find you easily just by smelling all the reek. Krett12 (talk) 04:42, 30 November 2015 (UTC)