Aggregate effects doctrine
This article may be confusing or unclear to readers. (November 2024) |
The Aggregate effects doctrine is an idea about how laws work in the United States of America. The Aggregate effects doctrine is also named the Cumulative effects doctrine. The Aggregate effects doctrine is also named the Substantial effects doctrine.
The Aggregate effects doctrine allows a power of the United States of America's Congress to go further than that power could go before. That power is the power to decide about trade between states of the United States of America. The Aggregate effects doctrine is the belief that that power also allows the United States of America's Congress to decide about some trade within only 1 state of the United States of America. That some trade is that trade which changes something about trade between states of the United States of America.[1][2][3][4][5][6]
Related pages
changeReferences
change- ↑ Jaikumar, Arjun K. (2014). "Red flags in federal quarantine: The questionable constitutionality of federal quarantine after 'NFIB v. Sebelius'". Columbia Law Review. 114 (3). Columbia Law School: 677–714. ISSN 0010-1958. JSTOR 00101958. LCCN 29-10105. OCLC 01564231. Retrieved 2022-12-28.
- ↑ https://academic.oup.com/book/2692/chapter-abstract/143144481#Page=126
- ↑ Chen, James (2003). "Filburn's Legacy". Emory Law Journal. 52: 101–151. S2CID 155553669. Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-24.
- ↑ Svatek, Marlow (2017). "Seeing of the Forest for the Trees: Why Courts Should Consider Cumulative Effects in the Undue Burden Analysis". N.Y.U. Review of Law & Social Change. 41 (121).
- ↑ Solum, Lawrence B. (2013). "How NFIB v. Sebelius Affects the Constitutional Gestalt". Washington University Law Review. 91: 1–58.
- ↑ Thimmesch, Adam B. (2020). "The Unified Dormant Commerce Clause". 92 (2): 331–381.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help)
