Open main menu

Constitutional republic

Type of republic that operates under a system of separation of powers

A constitutional republic is a form of indirect democracy where the represenatives are elected, and the rules are set down in a written constitution. It is often simply called a "republic".

The head of state and other representatives are elected but they do not have uncontrolled power. What they may do is written in the constitution. If there is dispute about what the constitution means, this is decided by a court which is independent from the politicians.

The constitution describes how the state may be run. The constitution limits the power of each officeholder. Constitutional republics usually have a separation of powers. The separation of powers means that no single officeholder gets unlimited power. John Adams said that a constitutional republic was "a government of laws and not of people".[1]


Diagram of the Federal Government and American Union, the first constitutional republic. This print was published in 1862.

Constitutional governance argue is meant to be a safeguard against tyranny. No office holder can get to a position of absolute power. However, some have argued that a constitution can be written in such a way that it lets tyranny arise, and that a constitution is therefore not a fail proof safeguard against tyranny. [2]

Aristotle was the first to write about the idea in his works on politics.

Constitutional monarchies are a special case: even though the monarch is not elected, the people still elect other governing bodies. The constitution also limits the power of the monarch.

ComparisonsEdit

Comparisons can be made. There are countries which nominally are constitutional republics, but which have become (in effect) dictatorships. There are also countries which have no written constitution, and are monarchies, but which act in a similar way to constitutional republics.

ReferencesEdit

  1. Levinson, Sanford. 1989. Constitutional faith. Princeton University Press.
  2. Delattre, Edwin. 2002. Character and cops: ethics in policing, American Enterprise Institute, p. 16.

Related pagesEdit