Eyestalk ablation

removal by fishery managers of one or both eyestalks from a crustacean

Eyestalk ablation is a common practice in shrimp farming. Ablation is a more technical word for removal. With eyestack ablation, one or both eyestalks are removed from female shrimps. Sometimes the eyestalks are not removed, but they are made unusable. This is done to encourage the crustaceans to develop mature ovaries and lay eggs. In captivity, female shrimps often face challenges in maturing their ovaries. Even when a species can reproduce in captivity, eyestalk ablation boosts egg production and the number of females involved in reproduction. After eyestalk ablation, complete ovarian development can happen in as little as three to ten days, making shrimp farming more reliable.[1][2]

The eyestalks of female shrimp are often removed (ablated) to improve reproduction.
The red dotted line shows where the eye stalk is cut or cauterised during ablation.

The main idea behind eyestalk ablation is to reduce the inhibitory effect of a hormone called gonad inhibitory hormone (GIH).This hormone is produced in the eyestalk. It is usually present in higher levels during non-breeding seasons, inhibiting ovary development. By removing the eyestalk, the level of GIH decreases, allowing mature ovaries to develop. Another theory suggests that eyestalk ablation affects light perception, influencing ovarian maturation.[3][4] The exact way eyestack ablation works is not fully understood.[1]

Critics argue that eyestalk ablation is harmful to shrimps as it is often done without anesthesia, causing stress due to impaired vision.[5][6] In some shrimp species, like the tiger prawn, the eyestalks can fully regenerate in less than six months.[7] There is also a debate about the ways in which crustaceans feel pain.

Eyestalk ablation is currently prohibited in Europe for organic production.[8] In 2016, Seajoy, one of the major producers of premium farmed shrimp in Central America, started to farm only ablation-free shrimp.[9]

Effects change

Eye ablation in female shrimps has various effects, including:[1][10]

  • It makes shrimps lay more eggs but not necessarily larger ones.
  • The time between moulting cycles becomes shorter.
  • The mortality rate of shrimps increases up to three times.
  • The overall health of female shrimps declines.
  • In some cases, it results in a lower hatching rate of eggs.
  • The color of ovaries can change.
  • Shrimps experience higher energy demands.
  • Over time, the quality of eggs decreases.
  • Offsprings born this way may be more prone to diseases like WSSV.

Methods change

There are different ways to do eyestalk ablation, including:[8]

  • Pinching the eyestalk halfway to two-thirds down, which might create an open wound.
  • Slitting one eye with a razor blade, then crushing the eyestalk from halfway to two-thirds down until the eye contents are removed. This method is also known as enucleation and leaves the transparent exoskeleton for quicker healing.
  • Cauterizing through the eyestalk using an electrocautery device or a red-hot wire, which, if done correctly, closes the wound and helps scar tissue form faster. Another way is to use scissors or a sharp blade to cut the eyestalk and then cauterize the wound.
  • Tying off the eyestalk tightly with surgical thread, ensuring immediate wound closure.

Alternatives change

There are viable alternatives. They include:[2][11][12]

  • Giving high-quality, nutritious food in the pre-maturation stage.
  • Changing the sex ratio in breeding tanks from 1:1 to 1:2 (male-to-female).

Non-ablated females have lower mortality rates and produce more robust offspring; this reduces the need for chemicals and antibiotics.[11][12]

References change

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Uawisetwathana, Umaporn; Leelatanawit, Rungnapa; Klanchui, Amornpan; Prommoon, Juthatip; Klinbunga, Sirawut; Karoonuthaisiri, Nitsara (2011-09-07). Agoulnik, Irina (ed.). "Insights into Eyestalk Ablation Mechanism to Induce Ovarian Maturation in the Black Tiger Shrimp". PLoS ONE. 6 (9): e24427. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024427. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 3168472. PMID 21915325.
  2. 2.0 2.1 "Stirling researchers identify viable ablation alternatives for shrimp hatcheries « Global Aquaculture Advocate". Global Aquaculture Alliance. Retrieved 2020-09-23.
  3. Bray, William A.; Lawrence, Addison L. (1992), "REPRODUCTION OF PENAEUS SPECIES IN CAPTIVITY", Marine Shrimp Culture, Elsevier, pp. 93–170, retrieved 2024-01-02
  4. Hoang, Tung; Lee, S.Y; Keenan, Clive P; Marsden, Gay E (2002). "Ovarian maturation of the banana prawn, Penaeus merguiensis de Man under different light intensities". Aquaculture. 208 (1–2): 159–168. doi:10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00713-X.
  5. "The prawn industry is cutting prawns' eyes off to make them breed faster". Animals Australia. Retrieved 2024-01-02.
  6. "Australian prawn farmers blindsided by animal cruelty claims". ABC News. 2017-09-08. Retrieved 2024-01-02.
  7. Desai, U.M.; Achuthankutty, C.T. (2000). "Complete regeneration of ablated eyestalk in penaeid prawn, Penaeus monodon" (PDF). Current Science. 79 (11): 1602–1603.
  8. 8.0 8.1 Expert Group for Technical Advice on Organic Production, Final Report on Aquaculture (Part B) (PDF), pp. 15–16
  9. "Seajoy's ablation-free shrimp answers emerging welfare concern « Global Aquaculture Advocate". Global Aquaculture Alliance. Retrieved 2020-09-23.
  10. Magaña-Gallegos, Eden; Bautista-Bautista, Magali; González-Zuñiga, Linda M; Arevalo, Miguel; Cuzon, Gerard; Gaxiola, Gabriela (2018-08-03). "Does unilateral eyestalk ablation affect the quality of the larvae of the pink shrimp Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis (Letreille, 1817) (Decapoda: Dendrobranchiata: Penaeidae)?". Journal of Crustacean Biology. 38 (4): 401–406. doi:10.1093/jcbiol/ruy043. ISSN 0278-0372.
  11. 11.0 11.1 "Innovation Award 2020 finalist: Simao Zacarias' shrimp eyestalk ablation research « Global Aquaculture Advocate". Global Aquaculture Alliance. Retrieved 2020-09-23.
  12. 12.0 12.1 "The case against eyestalk ablation in shrimp aquaculture". thefishsite.com. Retrieved 2020-09-23.