The Sino-Tibetan or Trans-Himalayan languages, form a language family. This includes Chinese and the Tibeto-Burman languages and some 250 languages of East Asia. Kra-Dai languages and Hmong–Mien languages are also sometimes included.
|South Asia, East Asia, North Asia, Southeast Asia|
|Linguistic classification:||One of the world's primary language families|
Some 40 well-known subgroups, of which those with the most speakers are:
|ISO 639-2 and 639-5:||sit|
The largest language within this family are the Chinese languages by far with over 1.3 billion native speakers. It is also the one with the oldest writing (hanzi) going back to the Jiahu symbols in 6600 BC.
All these languages descend from a single proto-language. People are still working on what this sounded like.
Where did it come from?Edit
Some researchers think the Sino-Tibetan languages very likely came from the Huanghe in North-Central China (Zhongyuan). Others think they came from much further west, in southwest China or even Northeast India.
Zhang et al. (2019) did a study of 109 Sino-Tibetan languages to suggest a Sino-Tibetan homeland in northern China near the Huanghe basin. He found there was a split between Sinitic languages and the Tibeto-Burman languages approximately 4,200-7,800 years ago (with an average of 5,900 years ago). This is connected with the expansion of the Yangshao culture and Majiayao culture. Others agree by using different data; they say it came from around 7,200 years ago, around the Cishan and early Yangshao culture.
Evolution of languageEdit
Proto-Chinese and Proto-Tibeto-Burman had many different prefixes and suffixes. Proto-Chinese changed to Old Chinese around the Shang Dynasty. This is shown in the Book of songs. Nouns, verbs, and modifiers were all dependent on affixes (beginning of words) such as *s-, *p-, *-k. After the Warring State Period in China, Old Chinese started using tones. The suffix (end of words) *-s was also used.
SOV is likely the original word order. Over time Chinese became subject–verb–object. However, Chinese differs from almost all other VO languages in the world in placing relative clauses before the nouns they modify.
Relation to other language familiesEdit
Sino-Tibetan may be related to the Altaic languages. Mang Mulin, a Mongolian linguistics professor at the Inner Mongolia Normal University, began studying the origin of Mongolian words in the late 1970s.
- Zhang, Meng-han (张梦翰); Yan, Shi (严实); Pan, Wuyun (潘悟云); & Jin, Li (金力). (2019). Phylogenetic evidence for Sino-Tibetan origin in northern China in the Late Neolithic. Nature, 569, 112–115. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1153-z
- Sagart, Laurent, Guillaume Jacques, Yunfan Lai, Robin Ryder, Valentin Thouzeau, Simon J. Greenhill, and Johann-Mattis List (2019): Dated language phylogenies shed light on the history of Sino-Tibetan. PNAS. doi:10.1073/pnas.1817972116
- Wu (1987). harv error: no target: CITEREFWu1987 (help)
- 吴, 安其. "汉藏语使动和完成体前缀的残存与同源的动词词根".
- Wang (1980), p. 221. harv error: no target: CITEREFWang1980 (help)
- Dryer (2003), pp. 43–45. harv error: no target: CITEREFDryer2003 (help)
- DeLancey, Scott. "On the origins of Sinitic". citeseerx.ist.psu.edu. Retrieved 2019-07-24.
- Dryer (2003), pp. 50. harv error: no target: CITEREFDryer2003 (help)
- "Han-Tibetan, Altaic Languages "Close Relatives"". www.china.org.cn. Retrieved 2019-07-24.