Talk:António de Oliveira Salazar

Latest comment: 1 month ago by 197.159.176.226 in topic Biased description of Salazar

Untitled

change

Seems to be be very pro Salazar, no other points of view considered, no sources cited Christopher Pritchard (talk) 20:06, 7 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

I recommend two books. "António de Oliveira Salazar: O Outro Retrato", by Jaime Norgueira Pinto, a fairly balanced account, and "Os Meus 35 anos com Salazar" by Maria da Conceiçao de Melo Rita, an adopted (informally) daughter. 2001:569:BE53:F700:4595:4B6F:D123:3120 (talk) 01:47, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Added intro paragraph based on this version of the enwiki article [1]. The page needs major work.--Peterdownunder (talk) 04:59, 17 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

POV material

change

This was removed from the article until it could be rewritten with a neutral point of view:

A little known fact is that Salazar's Portugal was the only European nation at the time to have non white people at all levels of administration and judiciary . Dark skinned people termed "colonial subjects" by other contemporary colonial powers very rarely qualified for rights similar to those enjoyed by the citizens of their colonial masters. Portugal accorded its "subjects" full civil status . It was the only State anywhere in the western world to have non European non white Members of Parliament. This status was however not universally available to the Blacks of the African territories i.e. those who were not "assimilados" (which literately translates to "assimilated") which meant those Africans who had not given up their tribal customs nor reached minimum educational standards.Roughly 4% of the African populace was considered "assimilado" whilst in the overseas colonies of Cape Verde,India and China were considered universally "assimilados" even though in the latter two territories, people were not largely Roman Catholic nor did most speak the Portuguese language.

In the mid sixties Portugal and its colonies found themselves in the front line of the Cold war, with a proxy war which drained Portugal of its resources. Salazar was blamed for a War he had no control over and the consequent impoverishment of his country. Thousands from mainland Portugal fled into neighbouring European countries particularly France to avoid the military draft and the war in Africa. Most took up menial jobs and were a convinient source of low cost labour in Europe. This expatriate segment of society got increasingly empowered after a Military coup overthrew the government of Salazar's successor Marcello Caetano in 1974. Many returned to Portugal to become next generation Politicians.

The term "fascist regime" probably stems from a attempt by this sizable group to demonize the fallen regime and justify their flight from a country at war.

Salazar is still loved by some of the people of Portugal today, and was voted the greatest Portuguese man of all time. Apologists say that it was more as a way of showing frustration with the current political events and politicians in Portugal than actually a true devotion.A great segment of the Portuguese people though may beg to differ.

Other sections still being worked on --Peterdownunder (talk) 13:28, 7 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

It looks as if someone has reinstated this material. I agree that the article is highly skewed. The characterization of Sousa Mendes is particularly outrageous. Beebop211 (talk) 18:05, 13 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Biased description of Salazar

change

This article is very much in favor of Salazar. It does not include the negative effects his decisions had on colonized people as well as its own Portuguese citizens. Portuguese people (including my family members) were forced to go to war in countries they had never even set foot in, just so that Salazar and The Portuguese Kingsom could maintain power over the colonies. Instead of claiming to be the voice for majority of Portuguese people (without any sources) this article should instead present facts about his actions, as well as positive and negative consequences of his actions according to different people affected. Then people can make up their own mind about what they think of him. 197.159.176.226 (talk) 19:33, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Return to "António de Oliveira Salazar" page.