Talk:Inverse function

Latest comment: 11 years ago by JayEB

Inverse functions are a neglected topic. They are often disposed of without consequence, except for those who must apply them. As a result, chronic defects in presenting the subject persist, and at least two basic approaches diverge, to the confusion of many. One insists that an "equivalent converse" form of a function is actually an inverse of the function. . The following link is to a collection of snippets on inverse functions, revealing a confusing landscape. https://picasaweb.google.com/112167498780318401154/INVERSEFUNCTIONS# JayEB (talk) 04:25, 7 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Return to "Inverse function" page.