Talk:Pomosexuality

Delete? Merge? change

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

(English-wiki does not have an article - I checked today.) The sources are (arguably) not saying anything notable. The sources are arguably not notable. 89.8.102.99 (talk) 05:15, 1 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

I'm not against it I'm just surprised there was an article about being pomosexual; I had to check I was on Wikipedia and not Sexuality Wiki or LGBTQIA+ Wiki. I didn't even know it was a word until today. But I found it online,^[1] and Wiktionary and Wikidata:pomosexuality (Q3626860), as well as Wikipedia in Portuguese:Pomosexuality, Spanish:Pomosexuality, Czech:Pomosexuality, and Bulgarian:Pomosexuality.

The sources don't seem too bad but is it a good idea? 134.10.79.28 (talk) 08:29, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

I think, based off the lack of significant coverage, that this should be soft redirected to Wiktionary. Griff (talk) 09:34, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

↑ The University of Connecticut Rainbow Center. "LGBTQIA+ Dictionary" (PDF). Rainbow Center. University of Connecticut. Retrieved 3 March 2022.

Add topic

[LGBTQIAdictionary-1] The University of Connecticut Rainbow Center. "LGBTQIA+ Dictionary" (PDF). Rainbow Center. University of Connecticut. Retrieved 3 March 2022.

[1]