Wikipedia:Editor review/Hazard-SJ

Hazard-SJ

Hazard-SJ (talk · contribs) Hello, fellow wikipedian! How would you describe my contributions up to date? Hazard-SJ^Talk 23:15, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

Your editing seems fairly well until now. I'm glad you didn't have any conflicts, and your work on Wikipedia:Disambiguation was very helpful, I believe. :) I can't find anything especially wrong, and your vandal fighting looks great. I'm sure your changes would be even better, though, if you tried to work just a little more on articles and less on your userspace, user talk, and subpages (not to say that I'm perfect in that part, though, my edit percent is failing these days ;p). You seem pretty active enough, just continue steadily with the good work. Cheers, Belle ^{tête-à-tête} 05:54, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. I'll keep that in mind. Hazard-SJ^Talk 05:57, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hazard, I love your enthusiasm and tireless activity. :) However, may I gently suggest a few things to help you become an even better editor? Firstly, as Belinda said, don't spend too much time on your userspace. We're here to build an encyclopedia, remember! ;) Secondly, try not to think about adminship, which is only a few more tools. :) It's my observation that people who most openly strive to become admins...usually don't succeed in becoming them. :( Confusing. Thirdly, please try making larger, more quality changes to improve or make articles instead of fast, tiny changes. In my opinion, one really good change is better than ten quick, effortless changes. And believe me, it'll be much more appreciated! :) Do try! You'll find that everyone will recognize and appreciate your merits. And remember, dear Hazard, my talk page is open if you ever need help with anything. Kindly, —Clementina talk 02:47, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll be doing so after I complete my colour scheme on my userspace pages (I know some people had a problem with that, and I had it a bit too). Is there a such extension that grants deletion rights to non-admins? Hazard-SJ^Talk 02:55, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I can't really say anything that hasn't been said. You're an eager editor, who has contributed almost 3,000 edits in 1 month here. But, a lot of those edits are userspace edits, so try to tone down on that. All in all, you're a good editor. Simon^KSK 23:04, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Focus more on article space and less on administratorship and userspace edits. We're here to build an encyclopedia, not a soapbox :) Otherwise, keep up the good work. Furthermore, no need to let every user know about things that have been marked for quick deletion, especially those that are established editors. They usually either don't care about pages that they've made that have been nominated for deletion or quick deletion, or if they did, they would contact you directly. Just keep it up, focus more on articles and less on other stuff and you'll be a great editor someday. Razor flame 23:07, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

View this user's edit count using WikiMedia X! Tool

Questions

Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
Yes, Wikipedia:Disambiguation, because I believe that as a project page, it should be in a form that can be understood, and cleaning it up added to my experience using wiki markup.
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
I think I am OK. I currently can't remember any up to date.
I was recently reviewing the requests for bots when I came upon this when you applied for a bot: Not done You are far too soon off of a block for sockpuppetry to be permitted a bot account. fr33kman 05:58, 31 July 2010 (UTC). Care to explain? Battleaxe9872 ^文/ _テ 22:14, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Then, at that block, I didn't new much about Wikipedia, including socking and WP:CHU, and had older accounts. As I am now settled in, I now know a lot more than at first, and won't be seen doing a such action again. The bot was only for many minor edits. I was using the AWB, and didn't know how to use it with the flood flag to prevent the edits from showing up in NC by default. I later learned that the flag should be granted before I login on AWB. Hazard-SJ^Talk 22:39, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]