Wikipedia:Editor review/Tharnton345
Tharnton345 (talk · contribs) Hi, I want to have my edits reviewed. Thanks. I haven't been on here for long, but never mind. Tharnton345 (talk) 17:12, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Reviews
- Well, I don't fully know you, but I think your contributions are very good. You have more than 50% of your edits to articles and are generally a positive user to Simple English Wikipedia. God bless, American Eagle (talk) 00:40, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! Tharnton345 17:22, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Like AE, I can see that you have done most of your work in the mainspace recently which is a big plus. From your last RfA, it appears that you need to take things on WP a little more seriously. Another suggestion I have is improving articles to better than stub status. Shoot for a good article or two! Enjoy your editing! Malinaccier (talk) 22:21, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments
- View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool
Questions
- Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- Yes. For example on Edinburgh
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- The cities in England are what I most worry about. These are because it says for example St Albans, England should be St Albans, Hertfordshire etc. That is really annoying. Its everywhere. When I try to fix links I go and see recent changes and see that it is a bad edit. Outrageous.