Wikipedia:Editor review/Tharnton345 2

Tharnton345 2

Tharnton345 (talk · contribs) As didn't get any tips on my last one, I am filing a second ER. TurboGolf 17:44, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Reviews

• After going through some of User:Tharnton345/Articles Created, you seem to be an excellent editor and have worked hard. A suggestion, try expanding articles more, and writer longer ones. Not that they need to be Very Good, but in my opinion, 10 stubs isn't as good a 1 good-sized article. Vandalism reverting, such as this, are important, and you seem to know how do that and to use rollback well. You also seem to be very civil and welcoming, all of which are qualities of an excellent user. Keep up the good work! American Eagle (talk) 02:40, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

AE, I write stubs because I don't want them to be too long and for it to take a long time. I just put inportant facts in, and sometimes an image appears. TurboGolf 09:51, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I know, and that is a very good thing. God bless, TheAE talk 20:31, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments

• View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

Questions

1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

   Creating new articles. It sometimes takes a long time, but never mind.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

   My non-Unionist problems on en.