Wikipedia:Oversight candidates/NonvocalScream
NonvocalScream change
NonvocalScream (talk • changes • e-mail • blocks • protections • deletions • moves • right changes)
Statement change
Candidate Statement: I would like to volunteer with Simple Wikipedia in this way. I believe that I am trustworthy enough to not reveal any nonpublic information, as evidenced by my membership with the foundation otrs. I am also a member of the administrators group here on Simple Wikipedia, thus evidenced my local trust here. I am above the age of 18, and am listed on the foundation identity noticeboard. I understand the oversight policy and will not act outside that policy. I am available mostly for the answering of oversight requests, so I am active in that regard. NonvocalScream (talk) 17:52, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Questions change
Q: What experience do you have in identification-restricted roles? How would you decide whether something should be oversighted, as supposed to deleted? —MC8 (b · t) 17:55, Sunday July 26 2009 (UTC)
- A:I currently approve comments for the Wikimedia Blog as an identification restricted role. IP addresses of posters are logged there, so these can not be disclosed. Also, information can be oversighted when:
- Non public personal info has been posted, where the subject did not make that info available;
- Potential libel, where the WMF attorney requested there removal, or when the subject asks, and the case is clear... and there is no editorial reason to keep;
- When the WMF attorney asks us to remove copyright violations.
- The rest can be deleted in accordance with local policy and practice.
Q In light of your recent declaration of a wikibreak, do you still intend to pursue this role? –Juliancolton | Talk 04:13, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- A Work has me for about 48 hours... Hopefully shorter. This won't be a long break, but I won't be available for that time. NonvocalScream (talk) 04:16, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Alright, thanks for the explanation. –Juliancolton | Talk 04:58, 30 July 2009 (UTC)