Talk:David Eade

Article based on English Wikipedia

This article or parts of it were created based, in whole or in part, on this version of the English Wikipedia article. The complete history of the article can be found there.

Quick Deletion

I imported this article from the English Wikipedia and think it should stay because why is it on the English Wiki if I can't have it here? Helpthepeople9 - TALK 20:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

I am actually changing the criteria to copy/paste. PotsdamLamb (talk) 21:06, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Note that A3 only applies when the article is complex. IMO, it was not very complex on enwiki, and has been simplified further (note the with instead of partnered). I'm adding attribution now, so I don't think A3 applies at all anymore. Belwine (talk) 21:09, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

 Done - the QD request may need a different reason @PotsdamLamb: --Belwine (talk) 21:10, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

I went with A4; he is not very notable even for his active time years ago. I do not see a reason to include him as he does not meet notability. PotsdamLamb (talk) 21:15, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

I do not agree. It's a BLP and changing one word from en is not a significant change. A3 definition should be changed to match what the definition is and remove the word complex from it. PotsdamLamb (talk) 21:12, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

It may not be a significant change but that is how QD A3 works, at least right now.
As long as the language is simple and there is attribution, the article can be copied directly from enwiki. --Belwine (talk) 22:02, 17 February 2021 (UTC)