Explained content removal change

At this edit, content was removed per the reason explained in the edit summary, but an editor does not agree. I would like to ask if there is anything to verify this removal. MathXplore (talk) 08:21, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

I made a new topic regarding this, you can reply there. WannurSyafiqah74 (talk) 08:27, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
I added a new summary which hopefully specified things. I did not know. WannurSyafiqah74 (talk) 08:31, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sorry - I wanted to revise the page without copying from the original change

I didn't realize "do not edit with an unexplained content removal" was a rule. I apologize.

However, I do not condone such "fanon" style of editing when it makes the series' page full of false information, such as claims it was made by Jean-Yves Raimbaud (who was deceased in the 90's), that it was a Xilam production (debunked on their site itself, since the page was nonexistent). This seems to be a recurring thing with obscure cartoon articles.

I do not want to copy from the original, but I'll state why I removed things next time. WannurSyafiqah74 (talk) 08:26, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Operator873 Hey, thanks for the rollback! I would've written a shorter premise by scratch myself, but I appreciate the effort to fill the page up back to where it was. WannurSyafiqah74 (talk) 08:43, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Actually it was a restoration. We only use rollback for obvious vandalism. MathXplore (talk) 08:49, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Return to "Numberjacks" page.