March 2012
changePlease do not call people's edits "vandalism" just because you disagree with them. Also, accusing someone of having a conflict of interest with a subject is a breach of our policies on civility. Without proof, it amounts to a personal attack. Osiris (talk) 13:09, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't actually mean to say vandalism, but editing warring, which is not good as well. And there are good evidences for my stating of CoI = those users wants to use that specific article as an object of their opinion or ideology, which makes me so mad. Sorry. Regards, --195.252.67.184 (talk) 13:16, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- Then I suggest you remove any unsubstantiated accusations. And again, unless you have hard evidence that the authors have a close relationship with the subject, it's a breach of our behavioural guidelines to openly accuse them of such. You're expected to assume good faith. Osiris (talk) 13:30, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I'll try to be more "calmed down" next time. PS: In Simple English: hard evidence, what would that be in normal English? Reliable evidence or what? I'm just curious :). --195.252.67.184 (talk) 13:38, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hard evidence: an object or fact that serves as conclusive evidence of a crime or similar act. Osiris (talk) 13:44, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 | This is the discussion page for a person who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. An IP address can be shared by many people. If you feel that things said here are not about you, you can create an account or log in to stop it happening again. |