Wikipedia:Editor review/Da Punk '95 2

Da Punk '95 (talk · contribs) I am requesting another review to see where I can improve myself on here. Da Punk '95 talk 22:07, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

Ohai. Looking at your edit count, I'm impressed of how much you edit in the Wikipedia namespace. But you do have a rather low count in the mainspace. Try boosting that up with quality edits and try touching at least 50%. Now, the articles you say you are pleased with are just stubs. Maybe try getting one of them to WP:GA. They are good starts, but try promoting one. We love seeing good article writers. And if you do promote one to GA, try taking the next step to WP:VGA. And looking through your history here, I don't see you have caused any major disputes, which is generally good. Try commenting more at WP:AN. That will show you want to settle things out. I think you tried an WP:RFA a while ago, correct? Well, if you do decide to try again, make sure you really know our policies, you have been here for a good amount of time, and that you feel the community trusts you. Oh, and do some vandal fighting also, I don't really see much work in that area. Well, that's just about it. If you ever have any questions, I'm always active and willing to answer them. Thanks, RyanCross (talk) 03:41, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Questions

Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
I am pleased with my work to M-Train, M-Tram and EastLink, Melbourne. I am pleased with M>Train/M>Tram because I spent a lot of time researching both companys, and getting image licencing off Flickr. While this time would have been better spent being with my friends, it gives me something to be proud of. It is very hard to get info of defunt companys.
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
N/A