Wikipedia:Editor review/Runningblader

Reviews

So far, your edits are good. You edit a lot in the mainspace, you create articles and follow other people's advice. The only thing you should change is your spelling. When you write an article, you could write it in Word, then use the spell checker to correct any mistakes, then copy and paste the new, fresh article into the mainspace! --Gwib^-(talk)- 10:42, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:-I'll start using word then paste the articles Running talk 23:55, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been doing a good job so far. I feel that you might need to read over WP:MOS a bit. You have been notified about your spelling a few times. It appears you have fixed your misspelling of vandalism. Other than vandalism, please remember this: article, not artical, remember, not reimber. Keep up the good work.--♠ Lights talk 22:07, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been doing fairly good as of late, and you now have some good edits, but I think you still have some things to improve on before another RfA. Besides, that is, other then the ones stated above. Try to get more edits to articles, revert more vandalism, etc. But overall, I think that you've been doing better, but stay patient. Cheers -- A^pE^t_SIG 03:24, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Questions

Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
Yes creating OGame, Mineral, Mineral (disambiguation)
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
I'm mostly calm but when users tell me to stop or things like that I follow