Wikipedia:Editor review/TerryfaeScotland

TerryfaeScotland (talk · contribs) I'd like a review before I have another RfA. Terry Talk - Changes 08:34, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

  • You are on the right path towards Adminship City, but the road is very rocky and the terrain is very droll and is pretty much lifeless. In other words, I would like to suggest that you take another look at the Vandalism Policy and the deletion policy here on the Simple English Wikipedia, along with doing the followings:
Improve your activity by being on here more. The reason why you need to be active as an administrator is because things can happen on a Wikipedia very quickly, and one must be certain that there is someone there to help take care of the issue before it spirals out of control. Also, an administrator needs to be informed of all the latest sockpuppet creation attemps and of things posted on the WP:AN. If you aren't very active, then you aren't really doing that good of a job helping to keep the Simple English Wikipedia afloat, eh?
Increase the amount of vandalism that you have been fighting. While I admit that you have been doing an excellent job at this as of late, I would like to see more QD tags from you so that I can be certain that you fully understand the deletion policy.
Edit articles more. While a good portion of the articles that you have created in the past have been very well written, the fact of the matter is that you don't edit the mainspace as much. Administrators need to be well-versed in every aspect of a Wikipedia, and good mainspace editing is a must-have for that area of adminship.
  • If you follow these three things that I just pointed out, I can see you becoming an administrator fairly easily in the future. You have the right demeanor and the right attitude, you just don't have the motivation yet, but you are getting there. Cheers, and good luck, Razorflame 23:56, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • You've been doing pretty good lately. And I (as Razorflame stated above) could seeing you become an Admin, but I'd also like to see your mainspace (article creation, expansion, simplification, etc.) rise a bit before that (you only have about 300 right now). But otherwise, so far, you're on the right tract. Cheers -- ApEtSIG 03:19, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    I am pleased with my contributions to the Pokemon articles. I did a lot of work on some of them.
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    There was a user clearing my talk page. I reverted the page and warned him.