Lateralization of brain function
The human brain has two halves, called the left and right hemispheres. These two halves of the brain are not exactly alike. For most tasks, both sides of the brain work together. But each side of the brain specializes in some things and works harder on those things than the other side. The term brain lateralization, or lateralization of brain function, means that the different halves do things differently.
The brain's hemispheresEdit
A deep groove called the longitudinal fissure separates the brain into its two hemispheres (halves). The two hemispheres are connected by the corpus callosum, a bundle of nerve fibers. The corpus callous allows the right and left hemispheres to communicate with each other, and to work together.
Both the left and right hemispheres look and work in similar ways. The large parts of both hemispheres are exactly the same on both sides. But in the smaller parts, there are some differences.
Sometimes, the brain is different for left-handed and right-handed people. For example, there are two areas in the brain that are very important for speech: Broca's area and Wernicke's area. These two areas are in the left hemisphere for about 95% of right-handed people, but only about 70% of left-handed people.
Popular articles on psychology often say that each side of the brain does things that the other does not. For example, a common mistake is the idea that the left side of the brain does all of a person's "logical thinking" (like solving math problems), while the right brain does all the "creative thinking" (like painting or drawing). It is often said that a person who is creative is "right-brained," while a person who is more logical or "book-smart" is "left-brained."
The truth is that both hemispheres work together on both logical and creative thinking. However, even though the two hemispheres work together, there is some hemispheric specialisation. Usually, the right side of the brain dominates the functions to do with creativity, spatial awareness, appreciation of music etc. whereas the left side of the brain dominates analytical, language-based and logical functions.
Examples of lateralizationEdit
Both hemispheres work together to do most things. However, for certain tasks, one hemisphere may be more "dominant" than the other. For example, in about 95% of right-handed people, the left hemisphere is dominant when it comes to language. For these people, their language abilities are controlled mostly by the left hemisphere. The right hemisphere helps too, but not as much as the left hemisphere.
Specifically, important parts of language like grammar and vocabulary are usually "lateralized" to the left hemisphere. This means that most thinking about grammar and vocabulary happens in the left half of the brain. This is especially true in right-handed people.
Not all parts of language are controlled mostly by the left hemisphere. Other important parts of language, like intonation (how words are said) and accentuation (which words in a sentence are stressed), are often lateralized to the right hemisphere.
Language production – writing or speaking – is an example of how lateralization can be different for right-handed and left-handed people. Language production is lateralized to the left hemisphere in about 90% of right-handed people. But in about half of left-handed people, language production is controlled by both hemispheres, or mostly by the right hemisphere.
- Understanding what we see and hear, recognizing faces, and artistic ability are all controlled by both hemispheres. However, the right hemisphere may be more dominant than the left, and work harder at these tasks.
- Important parts of math, like estimating and comparing numbers, are controlled by both hemispheres. But getting exact answers for math problems is a job done mostly by the left hemisphere. Damage to the left hemisphere can cause dyscalculia - trouble learning math and working with numbers.
- Remembering facts is mostly lateralized to the left hemisphere.
- Some people with depression have a right hemisphere that is too active. This means that:
- The right hemisphere is working too hard at thinking negatively and feeling negative emotions (like sadness); and
- The left hemisphere is not working hard enough at thinking about good feelings and experiences
Sometimes, people have brain injuries that hurt or destroy part of the brain. With very bad injuries, an entire hemisphere may be destroyed. Sometimes that hemisphere's jobs can be done by part of the other hemisphere. However, this is not always possible. It depends on the area that was damaged and the patient's age.
Sometimes, a brain injury damages pathways that carry information from one area to another. In some people, the brain can create other, less direct pathways (like detours). These new 'detours' may help the brain continue to carry information between the areas that were separated by the brain injury.
- Boeree C.G. (2004). "Speech and the brain". Retrieved February 17, 2012.
- Griggs, Richard A. Psychology: a concise introduction. p. 69.
- Nielsen, Jared A. et al. An evaluation of the left-brain vs. right-brain hypothesis with resting state functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging. PLOS ONE 2013.
- Goswami U (2006). "Neuroscience and education: from research to practice?". Nat Rev Neurosci 7 (5): 406–11. doi:10.1038/nrn1907. PMID 16607400.
- Westen et al 2006 Psychology: Australian and New Zealand edition. John Wiley p.107
- Toga A.W. & Thompson P.M (2003). "Mapping brain asymmetry". Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4 (1): 37–48. doi:10.1038/nrn1009. PMID 12511860.
- BBC News: Regarding different languages. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-11181457
- Taylor I. & Taylor M.M. (1990). Psycholinguistics: learning and using language. Pearson. ISBN 978-0-13-733817-7. p. 367
- Ross E.D. & Monnot M (2008). "Neurology of affective prosody and its functional-anatomic organization in right hemisphere". Brain Lang. 104 (1): 51–74. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2007.04.007. PMID 17537499.
- George M.S. et al (1996). "Understanding emotional prosody activates right hemisphere regions". Arch Neurol. 53 (7): 665–670. doi:10.1001/archneur.1996.00550070103017. PMID 8929174.
- Beaumont J.G. (2008). Introduction to neuropsychology. 2nd ed, Guilford Press. ISBN 978-1-59385-068-5. Chapter 7
- Dehaene S. et al (1999). "Sources of mathematical thinking: behavioral and brain-imaging evidence". Science 284 (5416): 970–4. doi:10.1126/science.284.5416.970. PMID 10320379. http://www.unicog.org/publications/DehaeneSpelke_ExactApprox_Science1999.pdf.
- Dehaene S. et al (2003). "Three parietal circuits for number processing". Cognitive Neuropsychology 20 (3–6): 487–506. doi:10.1080/02643290244000239. PMID 20957581. http://www.unicog.org/publications/DehaeneEtAl_3parietalCircuits_CogNeuropsy2003.pdf.
- Levy L.M; Reis I.L. & Grafman J. (1999). "Metabolic abnormalities detected by 1H-MRS in dyscalculia and dysgraphia". Neurology 53 (3): 639–41. doi:10.1212/WNL.53.3.639. PMID 10449137.
- Hecht D (2010). "Depression and the hyperactive right-hemisphere". Neurosci. Res. 68 (2): 77–87. doi:10.1016/j.neures.2010.06.013. PMID 20603163.
- Pulsifer M.B. et al (2004). "The cognitive outcome of hemispherectomy in 71 children". Epilepsia 45 (3): 243–254. doi:10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.15303.x. PMID 15009226.