Wikipedia

Religious experience

experience which has a strong, mystical character and a lasting impact on the subject

Sometimes people make experiences which they see in the context of a belief system. They call these experiences religious experiences, spiritual experiences, sacred experiences, or mystical experiences. William James made the concept popular, in the 19th century.[1] He did this to fight the growing rationalism of Western society.[1]

Meditation
Sufi whirling

In many religions, such experieces are called revelations. This also applies to the knowledge that comes from them. These religions say that a god or gods caused these revelations, and that they are not a result of a natural cause. They are considered real encounters with God or gods, or real contact with higher-order realities of which humans are not ordinarily aware.[2]


Skeptics say that these religious experiences are a normal feature of the human brain. As such, they can be studied in the same way other features of the brain are studied.[note 1] To better be able to study them, scholars have classified such experiences in different ways.[3]

Definitions

change

Psychologist and philosopher William James described four characteristics of mystical experience in The Varieties of Religious Experience. According to James, such an experience is:

  • Temporary- the person will soon return to a "normal" state. The experience may feel like it was outside time or space.
  • Diffiult to describe
  • Insightful - usually people think they have learned something valuable. Very often, they also think that this kind of knowledge is usually hidden from human understanding. (called noetic)
  • Passive - usually people cannot control the experience, it just happens to them.
  • Ecstasy – The believer has a soul or spirit which can leave the body. In ecstasy, the focus is on the soul leaving the body. It will then make experiences that are different (called transcendental). This type of religious experience is characteristic for the shaman.
  • Enthusiasm - The believer is not able to understand God. A sacred power enters the body of the believer and possesses it. A person who is able to handle this situation is often called a medium. The god or power will use the medium to give a message to the world. According to Lewis, this is the same as ecstasy, which is only one form of possesion.
  • Mystical experience – Mystical experiences are in many ways the opposite of numinous experiences. In the mystical experience, all 'otherness' disappear and the believer becomes one with the transcendent. The believer discovers that he or she is not distinct from the cosmos, the deity or the other reality, but one with it. Zaehner has identified two distinctively different mystical experiences: natural and religious mystical experiences (Charlesworth: 1988). Natural mystical experiences are, for example, experiences of the 'deeper self' or experiences of oneness with nature. Zaehner argues that the experiences typical of 'natural mysticism' are quite different from the experiences typical of religious mysticism (Charlesworth: 1988). Natural mystical experiences are not considered to be religious experiences because they are not linked to a particular tradition, but natural mystical experiences are spiritual experiences that can have a profound effect on the individual.
  • Spiritual awakening – A spiritual awakening usually involves a realization or opening to a sacred dimension of reality and may or may not be a religious experience. Often a spiritual awakening has lasting effects upon one's life. It may refer to any of a wide range of experiences including being born again, near-death experiences, and mystical experiences such as liberation and enlightenment.

History

change

Origins

change

The notion of "religious experience" can be traced back to William James. He used the term "religious experience" in his book, The Varieties of Religious Experience.[4] It is considered to be the classic work in the field. At professional conferences, people often cite this book. James makes a difference between institutional religion and personal religion. Institutional religion refers to the religious group or organization, and plays an important part in a society's culture. Personal religion, in which the individual has mystical experience, can be experienced regardless of the culture.

The term has been used before James, though.[1] In the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries, several historical figures said that religion and its beliefs can be grounded in experience itself. Many of these views had a lot of influence. Kant said that moral experience justified religious beliefs. John Wesley also thought that the religious experiences in the Methodist movement (paralleling the Romantic Movement) were a basis to religious commitment as a way of life.

Criticism

change

The notion of "experience" has been criticised.[5][6][7]

The term "Religious empiricism" is seen as highly problematic. Karl Barth saidf that the term was wrong altogether. Some influential modern scholars holding this liberal theological view are Charles Raven and the Oxford physicist/theologian Charles Coulson.

Robert Sharf points out that "experience" is a typical Western term, which has found its way into Asian religiosity via western influences.[5][9] The notion of "experience" introduces a false idea of duality between "experiencer" and "experienced". In kensho there is no duality of observer and observed.[10][11] "Pure experience" does not exist; all experience is mediated by intellectual and cognitive activity.[6][11] The specific teachings and practices of a given tradition may even determine what "experience" someone has; this means that this "experience" is not the proof of the teaching, but a result of the teaching.[11] A pure consciousness without concepts, reached by "cleansing the doors of perception",[13] would be an overwhelming chaos of sensory input without coherence.[6]

Notes

change
  1. ↑ Such study may be said to have begun with the American psychologist and philosopher William James in his 1901/02 Gifford Lectures later published as The Varieties of Religious Experience.

References

change
  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Sharf 2000.
  2. ↑ "philosophyofreligion.info". www.philosophyofreligion.info.
  3. ↑ Batson, C. D., Schoenrade, P., & Ventis, W. L. (1993). Religion and the individual: A social psychological perspective. Oxford University Press.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  4. ↑ Hori 1999.
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 Sharf 1995a.
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 Mohr 2000.
  7. ↑ Low 2006.
  8. ↑ Sharf 1995b, p. 1.
  9. ↑ Robert Sharf: "[T]he role of experience in the history of Buddhism has been greatly exaggerated in contemporary scholarship. Both historical and ethnographic evidence suggests that the privileging of experience may well be traced to certain twentieth-century reform movements, notably those that urge a return to zazen or vipassana meditation, and these reforms were profoundly influenced by religious developments in the west [...] While some adepts may indeed experience "altered states" in the course of their training, critical analysis shows that such states do not constitute the reference point for the elaborate Buddhist discourse pertaining to the "path".[8]
  10. ↑ Hori 1994.
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 Samy 1998.
  12. ↑ "If the doors of perception were cleansed every thing would appear to man as it is, infinite. For man has closed himself up, till he sees all things thru' narrow chinks of his cavern. by William Blake". www.quotedb.com.
  13. ↑ William Blake: "If the doors of perception were cleansed every thing would appear to man as it is, infinite. For man has closed himself up, till he sees all things thru' narrow chinks of his cavern."[12]

Other websites

change
Retrieved from "https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Religious_experience&oldid=7980943"