Talk:Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone article. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Please supply full citations when adding information, and consider tagging or removing unciteable information. |
.svg){kind=small} |
Daily article pageviews |
|
Graphs do not work. You can go to the graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org.
|
|
Untitled change
This article needs a complete rework it sounds like a joke. I would like to consider merging it into the George Floyd protests article.
Article needs to be redone change
This article needs a complete rework it sounds like a joke. I would like to consider merging it into the George Floyd protests article. Hollywood43ar (talk) 23:06, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Merge Request change
I would like to merge this article into the George Floyd protests article. Hollywood43ar (talk) 23:06, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Oppose The article has a lot of information. I see no reason to merge it. --IWI (talk) 23:13, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Support The article is a train wreck, looks like it was written by a 5 year old and is totally out of date as obviously the place has been demolished. It is not of enough importance to warrant it's own article.82.12.134.74 (talk) 00:12, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- When you say 'it is written by a 5 year old' you are not being WP:CIVIL, and you are also Attacking other other editors. Please refrain from making such comments moving on. Thanks --つがる Let's Talk! :) 🍁 01:13, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Wow change
This article looks like it was a 7th grader's essay that was given a D. I'd strongly recommend this article be rewritten by someone who knows how to write this in a much more streamlined manner, because as of now, the writing is absurdly clunky. There's a solid amount of unnecessary blanket statements ("Some people liked [Capitol Hill], some people didn't"), then there are statements that are just blatantly ignorant and give nowhere near enough information ("They wanted to destroy expensive buildings next to cheap ones"). Bottom line is: Reading this hurts, especially from the perspective of someone in support of Capitol Hill and anarchism in general. Rework it, PLEASE. Rivers.oak.06 (talk) 05:50, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
I'm much too tired to provide a few more examples of this absurd writing as of now, but if/when needed, I will. You get it. Rivers.oak.06 (talk) 05:54, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Rivers.oak.06: There are not a lot of editors here. You can rewrite it, if you want. Naddruf (talk) 22:22, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
yikes change
As everyone else has said, this article looks like it was written by a 4th grader. "It was in Seattle, which is a large city in Washington. It was 6 city blocks in size. A city block is a group of buildings with a street next to it"!? Seriously? You define the words? Please, somebody who has time, please completely rewrite this article. Gøøse060 (talk) 14:12, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
- As Tsugaru has brought up above, saying "this article looks like it was written by a 4th grader" is not being WP:CIVIL, and is also attacking others. Please do not make these kinds of comments.
- Also, this is the Simple English Wikipedia. Sometimes a definition is needed for a word that is not Basic English. InfernoGaming46 (IG46) (talk / changes) 14:19, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
Merger Request with Capitol Hill Occupied Protest change
There seems to me no reason for this article to exist when we already have the same article here. Either this one gets incinereted or we merge the two. كميراج (talk) 16:05, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
- That's on the English Wikipedia, and this is the Simple English Wikipedia. But we could rename this page to Capitol Hill Occupied Protest. Kk.urban (talk) 18:03, 2 November 2023 (UTC)