Talk:Lepidopteran diversity
Latest comment: 2 years ago by MrMeAndMrMe
- This is the kind of page which is completely unsuitable for our readership, but made complete sense on En wiki. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:34, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Macdonald-ross Perhaps it can be merged with Lepidoptera? MrMeAndMrMeLet's talk 19:41, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
- It's got no prose content, is far too detailed, and almost entirely redlinked. It can be used by professional lepidopterists, but quite pointless for our readers. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:58, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Macdonald-ross Good points, but remember that pages can be about complex ideas. It wouldn't necessarily be pointless as lepidopterists new to the language can come over here and learn about it. MrMeAndMrMeLet's talk 15:36, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- I shan't be holding my breath... Macdonald-ross (talk) 16:57, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- I think the point is that we put complex ideas and thoughts into simpler words for people who don't understand en or are new to the language. I think that this is something I am interested in personally and having redlinks and little isn't really a good RfD point standalone. MrMeAndMrMeLet's talk 17:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- I shan't be holding my breath... Macdonald-ross (talk) 16:57, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Macdonald-ross Good points, but remember that pages can be about complex ideas. It wouldn't necessarily be pointless as lepidopterists new to the language can come over here and learn about it. MrMeAndMrMeLet's talk 15:36, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- It's got no prose content, is far too detailed, and almost entirely redlinked. It can be used by professional lepidopterists, but quite pointless for our readers. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:58, 14 March 2022 (UTC)