Talk:Pazyryk rug
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Wiki-Cleaner-C in topic Reversion 06:12, 26 June 2020
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pazyryk rug article. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Reversion 06:12, 26 June 2020 change
From the recent reversion of 06:12, 26 June 2020, what are the issues and components. My edit was made in good faith, as I assume Djasso's was. Maidyouneed (talk) 07:14, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- Please don't delete sourced content again. Thank you. Wiki-Cleaner-C (talk) 21:34, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- And don't add pro-Armenian (biased) fringe sources again. Thank you. Wiki-Cleaner-C (talk) 21:38, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Can you please point out which sourced content has been removed and which source is pro-Armenian fringe. You have mass reverted many changes. Please identify which changes you have issue with rather than blanket reverting. Maidyouneed (talk) 22:48, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- This source Antike Orientteppiche p429 has had the quotation ""Die Annahme, daß aus dem ostturkestanischen Raum der Einfluß der Kunst den Weg nach Westen nahm, wird durch die Völkerwanderungen untermauert. " place up on it. However the immediately prefacing quote is in referenced to a 12th century AD. Is this relevant to the Pazyryk rug? Quote with context: "Ob die im Tarim - Becken geſundenen Teppichfragmente des 12. Jahrhunderts n.Chr . turkmenischen Einfluß hatten , ist fraglich . Die Annahme , daß aus dem ostturkestanischen .... " Maidyouneed (talk) 23:46, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- I fixed the reference. If you remove basic sourced content again, I will have to report you because of non-good-faith editing and disruptive edit warring. This is your last warning. Wiki-Cleaner-C (talk) 21:59, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for fixing the reference. I've added back in the reference quotation you had added. I hope this is acceptable. If you still have an issue with particular edits please raise them, rather than mass reverting many changes again. Maidyouneed (talk) 03:29, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- Better than before, but I have to reword many things. Wiki-Cleaner-C (talk) 12:58, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- I'm glad you both ended edit warring and decided to agree. You should both be aware of the edit warring policy for the future, though. IWI (chat) 13:05, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- I fixed the reference. If you remove basic sourced content again, I will have to report you because of non-good-faith editing and disruptive edit warring. This is your last warning. Wiki-Cleaner-C (talk) 21:59, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- This source Antike Orientteppiche p429 has had the quotation ""Die Annahme, daß aus dem ostturkestanischen Raum der Einfluß der Kunst den Weg nach Westen nahm, wird durch die Völkerwanderungen untermauert. " place up on it. However the immediately prefacing quote is in referenced to a 12th century AD. Is this relevant to the Pazyryk rug? Quote with context: "Ob die im Tarim - Becken geſundenen Teppichfragmente des 12. Jahrhunderts n.Chr . turkmenischen Einfluß hatten , ist fraglich . Die Annahme , daß aus dem ostturkestanischen .... " Maidyouneed (talk) 23:46, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
@IWI Thanks for joining our discussion. @Maidyouneed I split the origins into two main sections. I also split Schurmann from Gantzhorn, because they do not refer to each other. Wiki-Cleaner-C (talk) 14:53, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
@Maidyouneed: Why did you split the source for "Sakic funeral accessory"? If people want to know the source for this, they won't find it. Please fix it again. Thanks. Wiki-Cleaner-C (talk) 13:41, 21 July 2020 (UTC)