Talk:Zinc

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 64.4.104.2 in topic A few comments

Untitled

change

This article was nominated for Very Good Article review. Feel free to comment there and/or list some helpful corrections here. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 15:14, 15 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

This is how the article was before I started expanding it [1]. FYI Chemicalinterest (talk) 15:44, 16 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Since this article failed VGA, I have nominated it for GA. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 14:57, 30 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

This was nominated for GA and the result was complete silence comments like normal a promotion! --Chemicalinterest (talk) 14:25, 15 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

A few comments

change
  • Deficiency needs an article on the Simple English Witktionary.   Not done I do not have Internet access to wiktionary.   Done received temporary access and created it
  • Flotation should have an article here.   Done creating the article
  • Galvanizing is linked to this wiki in the lead, but is linked to the Wiktionary in the Uses section.   Done
  • Most of the sentences in the lead could be combined together.   Not done I don't want this to be too complicated. People might have a hard time grasping two thoughts in one sentence.   Done merged sentences whether complicated or not
  • It is also used in motorboats[20] and pipelines to slow rusting. Reference link should be at the end of the sentence.   Done
  • The preparation section could be expanded.   Done expanded a little and removed disambig link
  • The second reference, Some sources do not consider 70Zn to be radioactive. Who?   Done removed reference added by Eptalon
  • Reference thirty-four needs to be in {{citation}} or {{cite web}} format.  Done

Albacore (talk) 20:37, 25 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

what are you trying to say @Albacore? 64.4.104.2 (talk) 18:10, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Reference problem

change

For the statement on the half life of the 64Zn isotope, the ref is listed as CEC 2006 pgs.. Problem is, there is no listing for a CRC anywhere in the article. I tried finding a ref to back up the claim but all I could find was >=7x10^20.. kind of vague and doesnt support 4.3x10^18. Other than that, repaired 2 refs. rest seem fine in form cant say anything about if the are still live though. Didnt check. --Creol(talk) 02:58, 9 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Return to "Zinc" page.