71.230.93.11

Nazism

Holocaust is accepted almost by all historians only ones that are not considered reliable no need to add your own personal pov. It is undisputed. --Yegoyan 21:29, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

I think it would perhaps be better if you edited a topic that you do not feel so strongly about. Emotional attachment to a topic can easily lead to edit wars and personal attacks. While it has not reached that point yet, it could, and I don't think anyone wants that. · Tygrrr... 14:48, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

I would agree with Tygrrr on this issue. You definitely need to work on a different topic if you feel so strongly about Nazism. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 20:13, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

See Nuremberg Trials, and the link to Streichers verdict. You will see that Streicher was found guilty of crimes against humanity. His advocacy of hatred against the Jews paved the way for many horrors, and was not merely and exercising of free peace as you claim. If you say the article on Nazism is POV you cannot fix it by appending an opposite point of view.--Bärliner 21:12, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Blocked temp

You have consistently refused to listen to what is being said. You change this page and include incorrect links. This is vandalism. You are being banned temporarily from making changes to wikipedia. Please use the time to check what has been said on this talk page, including the links to the Nuremberg Trials and Julius Streicher and I hope that you we will be able to welcome you back as a better editor.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of your disruptive edits. You are invited to contribute in a constructive manner as soon as the block expires. Bärliner 13:07, 30 December 2007 (UTC)