This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

If you find this page on a site that is not Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. The page may be old and the owner of this page may not have a relationship with sites that are not Wikipedia. The original page is located at

Wikimedia Foundation
This is the User talk page for Chenzw, where you can send messages and comments to Chenzw.
User talk

Shahzadpur Maps CorrectionEdit

Dear Chenzw Pls Review My Edits On Simple Wiki . I have corrected wiki infobox but your bot reverts this Edit. Pls Check english Wikipedia,_Haryana for More information. Can You help to Provide Correct information. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2401:4900:1743:d99f:0:69:d94:7001 (talkcontribs) 06:40, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Kindly provide feedback on my workEdit

Mufti Mujeeb Ashraf Sahab Qibla

Hi, please consider asking this on Wikipedia:Simple talk. Chenzw  Talk  10:42, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Vicious user QuakewoodyEdit

Greetings to the esteemed administrator of Wikipedia. This user has ignored your edit in Ebrahim Darvish and has left a comment for him.This spare user Is closed to several wikis Please close it.Thankful

The editor is free to nominate an article at RFD even if a previous quick deletion has been declined. Chenzw  Talk  10:42, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

@Quakewoody:--Trade (talk) 15:39, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

  • those Iranian IP addresses usually means it is a Mh6ti sockpuppet, which makes total sense considering who created that article. Quakewoody (talk) 17:27, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Quakewoody, who is Mh6ti? Vermont (talk) 12:28, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Mh6ti is the name I remember his as, but his globally blocked sockpuppet vandalism goes back long before that. Quakewoody (talk) 12:44, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
This wiki does not have enwiki's equivalent of CSD G5. You will need more than "created by banned user" as a reason for deletion. Chenzw  Talk  01:24, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
He is a self-professed hacker. Nothing he edits is reliable. With a history of, what appear to be legitimate, page creations on one site to use as a source on another. Even many of his photo uploads, they are often photoshopped or CGI type of creations. here is his IMDB and every wiki. Quakewoody (talk) 12:53, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Tech News: 2020-31Edit

13:52, 27 July 2020 (UTC)


Oh well, NGC is famous for having items which cannot be found or are misdescribed. By allowing an unsourced claim to stand we are saying something like: "if it's a number, it must mean something". I'm saying we should not have it because there is no evidence it exists, and there is no source for it. Is there a better reason? Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:12, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

This galaxy appears to have been imaged by the Hubble Space Telescope already, and there are published papers mentioning this: [6] [7] [8]. In my view, lack of sources does not automatically mean something is a spoof, and even if the article is a hoax, I personally don't think it meets the standard required by QD A6 ("obvious" hoax). Chenzw  Talk  15:58, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 August 2020Edit

Tech News: 2020-32Edit

15:43, 3 August 2020 (UTC)