Loopy30

QD Criteria

Hi Loopy - Just because an article may have been created by a sockpuppet or master, A6 on simple is "Is an obvious hoax." The references listed do show this person is indeed real and from what I can decipher is who the creator of the article says he is. Therefore, he would be notable. It would be a G5 on English Wikipedia, but we do not have that on Simple Wikipedia. I hope this helps you. PotsdamLamb (talk) 01:59, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi PotsdamLamb, the housekeeping category (G6) has been used before to nominate articles for deletion that were created by an indefinitely banned user. If the reversion of edits by a banned editor practicing block evasion is not "routine", then how should this type of activity best be conducted? The potential merits of the banned user's edits, or the possible notability of the article subject do not make block evasion any more acceptable and it should be quickly reverted when found. If we were to do otherwise, then the sanction of a global block would be rendered meaningless. Could you please re-assess your interpretation of the QD criteria in these circumstances? 'Cheers, Loopy30 (talk) 02:37, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

If the content is okay, then we generally do not delete it regardless of the creator. Vermont (talk) 03:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)