RacoonyRE
| ||||||||||
|
Dear visitors, I attach importance to a friendly tone (Etiquette).
|
Welcome change
Hello! I noticed that you may have come here from another Wikipedia, so you know a little about how things work here. I hope you like it here and decide to stay! Here are some links to help you adjust:
- An English Wikipedian's guide
- Writing in Simple English
- Where to ask questions and discuss things
- How to copy from another Wikipedia
There is a lot to do here. Most of it is writing articles that do not exist yet, which you can do by translating from other Wikipedias, but have a look around and see what you want to do. Thanks for joining us, and you know how to contact me if you need any help. Belwine (talk) 16:27, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Belwine, thank you very much for your warm welcome. As you can see, my home wiki is the German Wikipedia and I try to support a little in the English Wikipedia as well as here. I personally find it very good that there is this "Simple" version, this certainly helps especially students who do not yet speak English so well to understand the content better. --RacoonyRE (talk) 16:31, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, I think the Simple English Wikipedia is a brilliant idea too. I think it's very helpful for people learning English.
Happy editing :D --Belwine (talk) 18:41, 21 March 2021 (UTC)- Absolutely. --RacoonyRE (talk) 18:50, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, I think the Simple English Wikipedia is a brilliant idea too. I think it's very helpful for people learning English.
sneed and chuck same person change
It is a dastardly theory that I propose, and one that may defy convention. I would not be surprised if I were to face humiliation and severe legal consequences for what I am about to say. But, one must always remain true to oneself, and one must allow for one's voice to be voiced, regardless of whether or not it is heard. And so, I propose the following: Chuck and Sneed are actually the same person, and there was never any change in ownership in the first place. As I'm sure you are aware, dear reader, "to fuck" means to engage in sexual intercourse. Similarly, "to seed" can be construed as "to impregnate", and impregnation, naturally, requires sexual intercourse under usual circumstances. "Seed" and "Fuck", in this case, mean the exact same thing. Similarly, "to feed" can be defined as "to give nourishment to", and in particular can have oral connotations, as well as colloquial sexual meanings. "To suck", in this case, is not meant to be taken literally- it is a colloquialism for performing fellatio on male genitalia. Again, we see extreme congruency between the colloquial meanings of "to feed" (in this case, the nourishment that is being provided is implied to be semen) and "to suck".
Hopefully I have adequately demonstrated, dear reader, that both Sneed's Feed and Seed and Chuck's Fuck and Suck have the exact same meaning, and that no change in functionality of the establishment in question has ever occurred. Perhaps it is a metaphor for how despite apparent change, conservation of energy demands that the universe remain constant and finite in its composition, doomed forever to repeat the same patterns of old in a cold, uncaring danse macabre. Or perhaps a more concrete explanation can be had. Chuck/Sneed could be a modern Jekyll and Hyde, perhaps even alters of a single entity named "Snuck" or "Cheed". One can only ever speculate, however, there is one certainty: nothing is ever as it seems in Sneed's Feed and Seed.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 191.99.3.42 (talk • contribs) 21:29, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
- I would not like to comment on this in the approach content. Nevertheless, have a nice evening! RacoonyRE Message meContributions 21:55, 2 April 2021 (UTC)