Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback/Archives/2023/August/Done

If I take into conclusion that Wikipedia is an MMORPG, then I'm gonna say that the thing with using Twinkle vs normal rollback is that Twinkle is like a handgun. Rollback is like a machine gun, rifle, or an explosive weapon such as an artillery (when reverting in mass edits). With rollback, I could be able to use some scripts to mass revert edits. Rollback is also good against attention seeking trolls and vandalism because it leaves no edit summary, just a message "Reverted edits by". It does the most damage to them, which can leave them to the point of giving up. This chance is increased if I per WP:DENY, don't leave anything on their talk page such as warning messages or by trying to communicate with them. To note you, I will only be using this tools for bad faith assumptlion. If I'm assuming good faith there, I'll just undo it or use Twinkle to revert the edit. Anyway, most of my contributions so far here are counter-vandalism works. Kaseng55 (talk) 00:15, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]