The European polecat (Mustela putorius) is a species of mustelid native to western Eurasia and north Morocco. It is also known as common ferret, black or forest polecat, foumart, or fitch. It is dark brown , with a pale underbelly and a dark mask across the face. Occasionally, there are other color variations, such as albinos. The family it is in also contains minks and other weasels. Compared to them, the polecat has a shorter, more compact body; a more powerfully built skull and teeth; and is less agile. It is well known for its ability to secrete a particularly foul-smelling liquid to mark its territory.
Temporal range: Middle Pleistocene – Recent
|Welsh polecat (M. p. anglia) at the British Wildlife Centre, Newchapel, Surrey|
It is much less territorial than other mustelid. Animals of the same sex frequently share home ranges. Like other mustelids, the European polecat is polygamous, with pregnancy occurring after mating, with no induced ovulation. It usually gives birth in early summer to litters consisting of five to ten kits, which become independent at the age of two to three months. The European polecat feeds on small rodents, birds, amphibians and reptiles. It occasionally cripples its prey by piercing its brain with its teeth and stores it, still living, in its burrow for future consumption.
The European polecat originated in Western Europe during the Middle Pleistocene. its closest living relatives are the steppe polecat, the black-footed ferret and the European mink. It can produce fertile offspring with the steppe polecat and the black-footed ferret. Hybrids of polecat and mink tend to be sterile, and are distinguished from their parent species by their larger size and more valuable pelts.
The European polecat is the only ancestor of the ferret, which was domesticated more than 2000 years ago for hunting vermin. The species has otherwise been historically viewed negatively by humans. In the British Isles especially, the polecat was persecuted by gamekeepers, and became synonymous with promiscuity in early English literature. During modern times, the polecat is still scantly represented in popular culture when compared to other rare British mammals, and misunderstandings of its behaviour still persist in some rural areas. As of 2008[update], it is classed by the IUCN as Least Concern due to its wide range and large numbers.
Dialectal English namesEdit
Probably no other animal on the British list has had as many colloquial names as the polecat. In southern England it was generally referred to as 'fitchou' whereas in the north it was 'foumat or foumard... However there were a host of others including endless spelling variations: philbert, fulmer, fishock, filibart, poulcat, poll cat, etc. Charles Oldham identified at least 20 different versions of the name in the Hertfordshire/Bedfordshire area alone.— Roger Lovegrove (2007)
|Linguistic group or area||Dialectal name|
As well as the several indigenous names referring to smell (see above), the scientific name Mustela putorius is also derived from this species' foul smell. The Latin putorius translates to "stench" or "stink" and is the origin of the English word putrid.
- Skumatov, D.; Abramov, A.V.; Herrero, J.; Kitchener, A.; Maran, T.; Kranz, A.; Sándor, A.; Stubbe, M.; Saveljev, A.; Savour-Soubelet, A.; Guinot-Ghestem, M.; Zuberogoitia, I.; Birks, J.D.S.; Weber, A.; Melisch, R. & Ruette, S. (2016). "Mustela putorius". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN. 2016: e.T41658A45214384.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
- Davison, A., et al. (1999) Hybridization and the phylogenetic relationship between polecats and domestic ferrets in Britain Archived 2011-07-27 at the Wayback Machine, Biological Conservation 87 :155-161
- "Khonorik: Hybrids between Mustelidae". Russian Ferret Society. Retrieved 9 May 2011.
- Lovegrove 2007, p. 198
- Cobham, Alan (n.d.) Dialect – A Glossary of Lancashire Words as Spoken in Mawdesley. Mawdesley Village Web Site. [online].Archived 2013-05-10 at the Wayback Machine
- Bachrach, Max (1953). Fur: A Practical Treatise (3rd ed.). New York: Prentice-Hall. OCLC 498697660.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
- Batten, Harry Mortimer (1920). Habits and characters of British wild animals. London [etc.]: W. & R. Chambers, Limited.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
- Brehm, Alfred Edmund (1895). "Brehm's Life of Animals". Chicago: A. N. Marquis & Company. Cite journal requires
|journal=(help)CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
- Harris, Stephen; Yalden, Derek (2008). Mammals of the British Isles (4th Revised ed.). Mammal Society. ISBN 0-906282-65-9.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
- Johnston, Harry Hamilton (1903), British mammals; an attempt to describe and illustrate the mammalian fauna of the British islands from the commencement of the Pleistocene period down to the present day, London: Hutchinson
- Hemmer, Helmut (1990). Domestication: the decline of environmental appreciation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-34178-7.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
- Heptner, V. G.; Sludskii, A. A. (2002). Mammals of the Soviet Union. Vol. II, part 1b, Carnivores (Mustelidae and Procyonidae). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Libraries and National Science Foundation. ISBN 90-04-08876-8.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
- Kurtén, Björn (1968). Pleistocene mammals of Europe. Weidenfeld and Nicolson.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
- Lewington, John (2000). Ferret husbandry, medicine, and surgery. Elsevier Health Sciences. ISBN 0-7506-4251-3.
- Lovegrove, Roger (2007). Silent fields: the long decline of a nation's wildlife. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-852071-9.
- Lydekker, Richard (1896). The hand-book to the British Mammalia. London: Edward Lloyd.
- Miller, Gerrit Smith (1912). Catalogue of the Mammals of Western Europe (Europe Exclusive of Russia) in the Collection of the British Museum. London: Printed by order of the Trustees.
- Ritchie, James (1920). The Influence of Man on Animal Life in Scotland; Study in Faunal Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.