genus of Late Cretaceous ceratopsids

Triceratops was a huge herbivorous ceratopsid dinosaur from the late Cretaceous. Its name came from having three horns on its head.[1] They were mainly found in North America. As adults, they grew up to 9 m (30 ft) long by 3 m (9.8 ft) tall, and probably weighed around 12 t (26,000 lb). Fully-grown, their skull was enormous (two meters long and nearly a meter wide).[2]

Temporal range: Late Cretaceous,
68–65 Ma
Skeletal mount of a T. prorsus specimen at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Clade: Dinosauria
Order: Ornithischia
Family: Ceratopsidae
Subfamily: Chasmosaurinae
Tribe: Triceratopsini
Genus: Triceratops
Marsh, 1889
Type species
Triceratops horridus
Marsh, 1889
Other species
  • T. prorsus Marsh, 1890
T. horridus skeleton mounted with modern limb-posture, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County
Tyrannosaurus and Triceratops models in an abandoned hotel,1949
Triceratops compared in size with a human

Triceratops was a low browser with a bony beak in front of its jaws. The jaws had close-set grinding teeth. Its defence had to stand up to attacks from taller theropods, hence the bony shield which covered its neck. Holes made by teeth have been found on the bony frill behind the horns, and on the sacrum (the part of the spine above the pelvis).

Many fossils of Triceratops have been collected since the genus was first described in 1889. There is at least one complete individual skeleton.[3] Paleontologist John Scannella observed: "It is hard to walk out into the Hell Creek Formation and not stumble upon a Triceratops weathering out of a hillside". Forty-seven complete or partial skulls were discovered in just that area during the decade 2000–2010.[4] Specimens showing life stages from hatchling to adult have been found.[5]

Body change

Size change

Individual Triceratops were about 7.9 to 9.0 m (26.0–29.5 ft) in length, 2.9 to 3.0 m (9.5–9.8 ft) in height,[6][7] and 6.1–12.0 tonnes (13,000–26,000 lb) in weight.[8]

Skull change

The most distinctive feature is their large skull, among the largest of all land animals. The largest known skull (specimen BYU 12183) is estimated to have been 2.5 metres (8.2 ft) in length when complete, and could reach almost a third of the length of the entire animal. It bore a single horn on the snout, above the nostrils, and a pair of horns approximately 1 m (3 ft) long, with one above each eye. Most other ceratopsids had large holes (fenestrae) in their frills, while those of Triceratops were noticeably solid.

Limbs change

Triceratops species were sturdy, with strong limbs and short three-hoofed hands and four-hoofed feet.[3]

The posture of these dinosaurs has long been the subject of some debate. Originally, it was believed that the front legs of the animal had to be sprawling at angles from the thorax, in order to better bear the weight of the head. This stance can be seen in paintings by Charles Knight and Rudolph Zallinger. However, evidence of trackways, and reconstructions of skeletons show that Triceratops and other ceratopsids had an upright stance during normal locomotion, with the elbows flexed and slightly bowed out. The stance was intermediate between fully upright and fully sprawling, similar the modern rhinoceros.[3][9][10][11]

Paleobiology change

A 1905 chart showing the relatively small brain of a Triceratops (top) and an Edmontosaurus (bottom).

Although Triceratops are commonly portrayed as herd animals, there is little evidence that they lived in herds.

In 2012, a group of three Triceratops in relatively complete condition, each of varying sizes from a full-grown adult to a small juvenile, were found in Wyoming, near Newcastle. The remains are currently under excavation by paleontologist Peter Larson and a team from the Black Hills Institute. It is believed that the animals were traveling as a family unit, but it remains unknown if the group consists of a mated pair and their offspring, or two females and a juvenile they were caring for. The remains also show signs of predation or scavenging from Tyrannosaurus, particularly on the largest specimen, with the bones of the front limbs showing breakage and puncture wounds from Tyrannosaurus teeth.[12]

For many years, Triceratops finds were known only from solitary individuals. These remains are very common: one palaeontologist reported having seen 200 specimens of T. prorsus in the Hell Creek Formation of Montana, U.S.[13] Similarly, Barnum Brown claimed to have seen over 500 skulls in the field.[14]: 79  Triceratops teeth, horn fragments, frill fragments, and other skull fragments are abundant fossils in the latest Upper Cretaceous of western North America. It was the most dominant herbivore of the time. In 1986, Robert Bakker estimated it as making up 5/6ths of the large dinosaur fauna at the end of the Cretaceous.[15]: 438 [16]

Triceratops was one of the last ceratopsian genera to appear before the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event. The related Torosaurus, and the more distantly related diminutive Leptoceratops, were also present, though their remains are rarely found.[14]

Dentition and diet change

Close up of the jaws and teeth

Triceratops were herbivorous, and because of their low head, their primary food was probably low growth, although they may have been able to knock down taller plants with their horns, beak, and bulk.[17] The jaws were tipped with a deep, narrow beak, good for grasping and plucking.[18]

Triceratops teeth were arranged in groups called batteries, of 36 to 40 tooth columns, in each side of each jaw with 3 to 5 stacked teeth per column, depending on the size of the animal.[19] This gives a range of 432 to 800 teeth, of which only a fraction were in use at any given time (tooth replacement was continuous and occurred throughout the life of the animal).[19] The great size and numerous teeth of Triceratops suggests that they ate large volumes of fibrous plant material,[19] such as palms and cycads.

Functions of the horns and frill change

There has been much speculation over the functions of Triceratops' head adornments. The two main theories have revolved around use in combat, or display in courtship, with the latter thought now to be the most likely primary function.[19]

Triceratops were long thought to have used their horns and frills in combat with predators such as Tyrannosaurus. The idea was discussed first in 1917 and again 70 years later by Robert Bakker.[15][20] There is evidence that Tyrannosaurus did have aggressive head-on encounters with Triceratops, based on partially healed tyrannosaur tooth marks on a Triceratops brow horn and squamosal; the bitten horn is also broken, with new bone growth after the break.[21] Since the Triceratops wounds healed, the Triceratops survived the encounter.[14] Tyrannosaurus is also known to have fed on Triceratops. Evidence for this includes a heavily tooth-scored Triceratops ilium and sacrum.

Signs of bone injury and repair in Triceratops

In addition to combat with predators using horns, Triceratops are classically shown engaging each other in combat with horns locked. While studies show that such activity would be feasible, if unlike that of present-day horned animals,[22] there is disagreement about whether they did so.

Juvenile and adult skulls — the juvenile skull is about the size of an adult human head

The large frill also may have helped to increase body area to regulate body temperature.[23] A similar theory has been proposed regarding the plates of Stegosaurus,[24] although this use alone would not account for the bizarre and extravagant variation seen in different members of the Ceratopsidae.[19] This observation is highly suggestive of what is now believed to be the primary function, display.

The theory of their use in sexual display was first proposed by Davitashvili in 1961 and has gained increasing acceptance since.[25] Evidence that visual display was important, either in courtship or in other social behavior, can be seen in the fact that horned dinosaurs differ markedly in their adornments, making each species highly distinctive. Also, modern living creatures with such displays of horns and adornments use them in similar behavior.[26] A 2006 study of the smallest Triceratops skull, ascertained to be a juvenile, shows the frill and horns developed at a very early age, predating sexual development and thus probably important for visual communication and species recognition in general.[27]

Paleopathology change

One skull, assigned to Triceratops, has a hole in the jugal bone. It looks like a puncture wound sustained while the animal was still alive. This is supported by signs of healing that are present in the bone around the supposed wound. When examined closely, the hole in the bone has a diameter that is very similar to diameter of the distal end of a Triceratops horn. This is evidence of competition between individual dinosaurs.[28][29]

References change

  1. Greek tri = three + keratops = horned face
  2. Skull of large Triceratops up for auction. [1]
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Fujiwara, S.-I. (2009). "A re-evaluation of the manus structure in Triceratops (Ceratopsia: Ceratopsidae)". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 29 (4): 1136–1147. doi:10.1671/039.029.0406. S2CID 86519018.
  4. "Morph-osaurs: how shape-shifting dinosaurs deceived us - life - 28 July 2010". New Scientist. doi:10.1080/02724634.2010.483632. S2CID 86767957. Retrieved 2010-08-03. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  5. Lambert D. (1993). The ultimate dinosaur book. Dorling Kindersley, New York. pp. 152–167. ISBN 1-56458-304-X.
  6. "T Dinosaurs Page 2". Archived from the original on 2018-10-07. Retrieved 2010-08-03.
  7. "Triceratops in the Natural History Museum's Dino Directory". Archived from the original on 2009-02-17. Retrieved 2010-08-03.
  8. Alexander, R.M. (1985). "Mechanics of posture and gait of some large dinosaurs". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 83: 1–25. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1985.tb00871.x.
  9. Christiansen, P.; Paul, G.S. (2001). "Limb bone scaling, limb proportions, and bone strength in neoceratopsian dinosaurs" (PDF). Gaia. 16: 13–29.[permanent dead link]
  10. Thompson, S.; and Holmes, R. (2007). "Forelimb stance and step cycle in Chasmosaurus irvinensis (Dinosauria: Neoceratopsia)". Palaeontologia Electronica. 10 (1): 17 p.
  11. New perspectives on horned dinosaurs : the Royal Tyrrell Museum Ceratopsian Symposium. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. 2010. ISBN 978-0-253-00779-7. OCLC 782878359.
  12. Triceratops trio unearthed in Wyoming. Retrieved on 2013-08-25.
  13. Erickson, B.R. (1966). "Mounted skeleton of Triceratops prorsus in the Science Museum". Scientific Publications of the Science Museum. 1: 1–16.
  14. 14.0 14.1 14.2 Dodson, Peter 1996. The horned dinosaurs. Princeton University Press.
  15. 15.0 15.1 Bakker R.T. 1986. The dinosaur heresies: new theories unlocking the mystery of the dinosaurs and their extinction. Morrow, New York. ISBN 0-14-010055-5
  16. Derstler K. (1994). "Dinosaurs of the Lance Formation in eastern Wyoming". In Nelson G.E. (ed.). The dinosaurs of Wyoming. Wyoming Geological Association Guidebook, 44th Annual Field Conference. Wyoming Geological Association. pp. 127–146.
  17. Tait, J.; Brown, B. (1928). "How the Ceratopsia carried and used their head". Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada. 22: 13–23.
  18. Ostrom J.H. 1966. Functional morphology and evolution of the ceratopsian dinosaurs. Evolution 20 (3): 290–308. [2]
  19. 19.0 19.1 19.2 19.3 19.4 Dodson P; Forster C.A. and Sampson S.D. 2004. Ceratopsidae. In: Weishampel D.B; Dodson P. and Osmólska H. (eds) The Dinosauria 2nd ed, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 494–513. ISBN 0-520-24209-2
  20. Sternberg C.H. 1917. Hunting dinosaurs in the badlands of the Red Deer River, Alberta, Canada. San Diego, California.
  21. Happ J. (2008). "An analysis of predator-prey behavior in a head-to-head encounter between Tyrannosaurus rex and Triceratops". Tyrannosaurus rex, the tyrant king. Larson P. & Carpenter K. eds. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. pp. 355–368. ISBN 978-0-253-35087-9.
  22. Farke, A.A. (2004). "Horn use in Triceratops (Dinosauria: Ceratopsidae): testing behavioral hypotheses using scale models" (PDF). Palaeo-electronica. 7 (1): 1–10. Retrieved 20 November 2010.
  23. Wheeler P.E. (1978). "Elaborate CNS cooling structures in large dinosaurs". Nature. 275 (5679): 441–443. Bibcode:1978Natur.275..441W. doi:10.1038/275441a0. PMID 692723. S2CID 4160470.
  24. Farlow, James O.; Thompson, Carl V.; Rosner, Daniel E. (1976-06-11). "Plates of the Dinosaur Stegosaurus : Forced Convection Heat Loss Fins?". Science. 192 (4244): 1123–1125. Bibcode:1976Sci...192.1123F. doi:10.1126/science.192.4244.1123. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 17748675. S2CID 44506996.
  25. Davitashvili L. Sh. (1961). Teoriya Polovogo Otbora (Theory of Sexual Selection). Izdatel'stvo Akademii nauk SSSR. p. 538.
  26. Farlow J.O. and Dodson P. (1975). "The behavioral significance of frill and horn morphology in ceratopsian dinosaurs". Evolution. 29 (2): 353–361. doi:10.2307/2407222. JSTOR 2407222. PMID 28555861.
  27. Goodwin M.B.; et al. (2006). "The smallest known Triceratops skull: new observations on ceratopsid cranial anatomy and ontogeny" (PDF). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 26 (1): 103. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2006)26[103:TSKTSN]2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0272-4634. S2CID 31117040.
  28. Farlow J.O. and Dodson P. 1975. The behavioral significance of frill and horn morphology in ceratopsian dinosaurs. Evolution 29: 353–361.
  29. Martin A.J. 2006. Introduction to the study of dinosaurs. 2nd ed, Oxford, Blackwell. pg. 299-300. ISBN 1-4051-3413-5.

Other websites change