This page has been removed from search engines' indexes.

Jiroemon KimuraEdit

Re: "Jiroemon Kimura" page edits on 30 December 2016

I wasn't quite sure what you were trying to do here, but if it was the case that you deleted the information in order for the article to correspond to the general biographical standards on Wikipedia, that's quite acceptable. It's just that I was the one who initially created the Longevity Records section on this page and submitted all the records in it, and I was trying to be quite specific with the list in order to emphasise the cumulative amount of longevity records of the person who is the subject of the article (Jiroemon Kimura). Just for future reference, if ever you're deleting information off an article, it would be greatly appreciated if you could specifically explain the reason for doing so in the "Change summary" section, just so that other users are aware of what it is you're doing. Thanks.

--Tomcollett (talk) 07:27, 30 December 2016 (UTC)Tomcollett

February 2018Edit

  Please do not make unhelpful changes to Wikipedia. The changes you made seem to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you want to try changing Wikipedia to learn more about how it works, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DJ Perez ( - ) 12:02, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

The closs-wiki vandalism, User:Dylan Cerbone 2018 has been blocked as "Not here to build an encyclopedia; misuse of talk and user pages". I will vanish this page with reasonable reason.Ayuta Tonomura (talk) 12:04, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

User:Dylan CerborneEdit

Hi Tonomura,stop making unconstructive and irrelevant edits to Dylan's userpage,he is a sockpuppet]] and therefore he is banned from editing and therefore by adding info. that obviously seems destructive I will without any hesitation revert the edits . Please refrain.Regards --DJ Perez ( - ) 12:12, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Dylan's userpage is uncomfortable and useless. And, the user page contains illegal copies from en-wiki. Also, if do not delete it, may be misused by users/socks. Delete is needed.Ayuta Tonomura (talk) 12:16, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
It is not a copyvio. The userpage is useless and if it makes you uncomfortable, don't view it. If the blocking admin wanted it gone they would have temoved it. A delete is *not* needed. Vermont | reply here 12:28, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Actually, a very small part is a copyvio. Delete is not needed, just remove the copyrighted cotnent and request revdel. Vermont | reply here 12:34, 26 February 2018 (UTC)