Hisham

Welcome to Simple English Wikipedia

Hi, Hisham, welcome to Simple English Wikipedia! Thank you for your changes. If you need help, check out the Help section of Wikipedia, or leave a message on my talk page. Whenever leaving messages on talk pages, please remember to sign your name by typing four 'tildes' (like this: ~~~~); doing this makes your name and the date show up. Also, it helps if you write something in the box that says 'change summary' whenever you change an article. Below are some useful links to make your time here simpler. Happy changing! Peterdownunder (talk) 11:08, 19 June 2012 (UTC) Getting Started How to: change a page • write simple English articles • A guide for users of the English Wikipedia Getting Help Administrators • Ask for help from administrators Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Verifiability Citing sources • What Wikipedia is not Copyrights • Image use policy • How to copy from another Wikipedia Spam • Vandalism • Deletion policy The Community Assume good faith • Be kind Community Portal • Simple talk • TASERING Announcements • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Cleanup Other Useful templates • Stubs

Practical comment

This comment here requires an explicit, in-depth response -- if not from you, then from whom and when? --Horeki (talk) 18:13, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

The analysis of Macdonald-ross here is on-point, timely ... and unaddressed. Why? This begs three two questions: (1) How can we achieve the hortatory goals of a worthwhile project; (2) How can the proposal incorporate this analysis? and (2) Why is it necessary for me to try to highlight the significance of complementary points-of view? --Horeki (talk) 18:40, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Gujranwala

I wonder if you have an opinion about Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2012/Sikh Villages In Gujranwala. What lessons, if any, should we draw from this?

Please consider commenting. --Horeki (talk) 18:52, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

IEP 2.0 proposal

I regret that I couldn't join you by agreeing to the IEP 2.0 proposal. If we re-visit this in future, maybe it will play out differently.

As the IEP 2.0 discussion winds down, it may be timely to contrast and compare an SEWP pilot program in Japan.

I mentioned it here, but two sentences may have been overlooked in the wall of words:

"... a very different kind of strategy has marked the development of a pilot SEWP program at Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU) here and here. Strategic planning and context-building here and here were quite distinct from the IEP 2.0 proposal."

I hope we can find ways to build on things that seem to be going well. --Horeki (talk) 19:52, 28 June 2012 (UTC)