Questions about some of your edits

change

You may have seen that I turned down your request for the rollback right because I have concerns about some of your edits. Here are my concerns:

  • Bootle: you added a {{restructure}} tag to this article, which says the article needs reorganizing. The article is only two sentences long: what do you think needs to be reorganized?
  • Penny Arcade: you asked for quick deletion of this article, using option G1 (nonsense). I don't see any nonsense there. What part of it do you think is nonsense?
  • June Angela: you asked for quick deletion of this article, using option A1 (little or no meaning). We have many stubs with this much information or less. What do you think is missing?

I'd appreciate you responding to these concerns. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:48, 29 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

@Auntof6: Bootle is a sketch, need more structur, with this. Want something like an index card, more link, more references,etc.
Penny Arcade have or this written a mode of advertising. Don't finder the adequate template for add at the page, and June Angela, the same as Bootle, need more information. Such as this, himself by able consider with sketch. Kind regards Leitoxx (talk) 15:53, 1 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
I don't understand everything you said, but here is some information:
  • Bootle: the {{restructure}} tag is not for articles that aren't long enough. It is for articles that need the content rearranged to make sense. For articles that aren't very long, you can put a stub tag on them or add some information yourself.
  • Penny Arcade: this article is not advertising.
  • June Angela: this article may be short, but we don't delete articles just because they are short. You could put a stub tag on this article, or add information yourself.
Let me know if you have any questions about this. --Auntof6 (talk) 23:55, 1 May 2014 (UTC)Reply