Auntof6

If I left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist. Please click here to leave me a new message.

My experience on english Wikipedia

hello again i made 100 edits i will never stop contribuiting here anyways i will tell my experience on english Wikipedia.

In october 2024 I started editing the article official state cars on en wiki as a anonymous user correcting grammar and adding content then i went to articles that list automobile brands adding more brands and still editing the official state cars article like adding more countries and refs but then on October 19 a veteran editor named sable 232 reverted my edits on car articles like for example he removed the info about faw toyota (a joint venture between toyota and faw) being chinese-japanese calling it unnecessary he also removed motorcycle brands on car brands articles saying that they arent automobile brands and etc because of him i took a break from contribuitions and i came back in November editing the official state cars article and adding more car brands in the same month i came to this wiki and i started writing articles that were short (like the Cadillac Lyriq article) then i started making more car articles and on january 5 2025 i created this account and anyways this is my experience on wikipedia but i still read en wiki articles and sometimes i go there to add some content anyways i hope you understand that good luck with your contribuitions best regards stay safe and hope everything good happens to you in this year best regards! Automobile enthusiast (talk) 23:13, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

@Automobile enthusiast: I'm not sure why you're telling me this. Did you need me to do something? -- Auntof6 (talk) 23:15, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

its because i just wanted to say that i made over 100 edits on wikipedia and i said my experience on en wiki Automobile enthusiast (talk) 23:17, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

@Automobile enthusiast: OK. You don't need to tell me about that. Let me know if there's something I can do for you. -- Auntof6 (talk) 23:18, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

no problem and also thank you for your contribuitions best regards stay safe and hope everything good happens to you in this year best regards. Automobile enthusiast (talk) 23:19, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Category:Roller coasters by name

An editor has requested deletion of Category:Roller coasters by name, a page you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the page meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Category:Roller coasters by name and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the page during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 05:59, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Pages

I have tried to simplify and categories the pages I created. Can you look into it and give me feedback? — Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 10:05, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

@Cactusisme: So that I don't have to hunt for the ones you worked on, how about giving me a list of ones you worked on. Include a reasonable number that have a variety of kinds of changes made, plus any you'd particularly like looked at. -- Auntof6 (talk) 12:40, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Monsters in Dungeons & Dragons — Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 00:57, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

@Cactusisme: You only made one change there: you added the monsters category. It's good to have that category, but since it's a subcat of the fictional characters category, that parent cat needed to be removed. (I removed it.)

I also made some other changes to the article. Let me know if you have any questions about them. Are there any others you want me to look at? Or do you want me to find some of the ones I had concerns about and let you know which articles they were? -- Auntof6 (talk) 01:29, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

The ones you had concerns about. — Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 10:49, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

@Cactusisme: OK. Give me a day or two to find some. -- Auntof6 (talk) 13:03, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Please note that Cactusisme created that article. 2601:644:907E:A70:90D6:48CC:297D:A452 (talk) 17:13, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Yes, we're talking about articles they created. When I said they'd made only one change there, I meant since we started this discussion. -- Auntof6 (talk) 00:51, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Take your time!! — Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 08:05, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

@Cactusisme: I'm going to leave a list of some things I found on your talk page. -- Auntof6 (talk) 08:56, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks — Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 09:47, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Love Connection related articles

For those articles, do you want me to do one large RFD for all of them, or individual ones? The reasoning for all of them will be basically exactly the same text. Ravensfire (talk) 02:07, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

@Ravensfire: I usually prefer one large one. It's easier to process. If people have different opinions on some of them, they can note that in the comments. Sorry to make you do this: I don't like to see things added to RFDs after they're created, for the reasons I explained on the RFD. -- Auntof6 (talk) 02:11, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

No worries, I get it. I didn't spot the massive unsourced walled garden until too late. I asked another admin about extending the time after I added the article list but they said just to let it run. I'll get the new one up shortly. Ravensfire (talk) 02:13, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

In regards to this RFD, I started the RFD to include all articles related to Love Connection, it was not a later add-on. As the principal article was deleted for lack of notability, it stands to reason that all related articles are also not notable, which is why I worded the nomination in that way. In my opinion, any editor reviewing the RFD would have seen my nominating statement, which clearly indicated that their !vote would impact all related articles. Thus, I believe that the result of this RFD should include all articles "related to Love Connection broadly construed", but I welcome your thoughts. Griff (talk) 02:26, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

As the admin closing the RFD, I don't want to have to guess what articles you think should be included. Even with that other RFD for everything in a category, the contents of a category can change over time: there's no way to know if the RFD creator would want any added pages to be deleted, or even any removed pages to still be included. Any pages to be included should be listed in the RFD. I know that can be a pain to do. In case anyone is interested, when I do that I build the RFD language in a text file outside of Wikipedia, then paste it into the window that comes up for creating the RFD. -- Auntof6 (talk) 02:36, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

In my opinion (again, just my opinion!), this is where administrator discretion comes into play. For example, if I create an article Love Connection characters, that did not exist at the time of the RFD creation, it would technically be excluded from the RFD that is already ongoing. However, because the nominator has specifically asked for community discussion to delete all articles broadly construed, an administrator could delete Love Connection characters in a year's time with the same G4 reason, referencing back to this RFD. If the user disagreed, they could take it to DRV.

As for the category, I believe that the closing administrator, as they close the RFD, would look at the articles and see if they were in the category at the time of the RFD opening. However, in this case, I also think that one could surmise that the nominator's intent was to RFD all paintings by Francesco, whether those articles exist or are created in the future.

Perhaps I am stretching the deletion policy here, but I feel this is similar to how we handled the Lake Como articles a long time ago. Griff (talk) 02:41, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

I think we're going to have to disagree on this. Other factors in this specific case are that the list of articles wasn't added until 5 days after the RFD was created, and it was added by a user other than the RFD creator. That doesn't give me confidence that the list is what the RFD creator intended. -- Auntof6 (talk) 02:51, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Cool. I'm going through the pain of a manual RFD on all of this. Look for it eventually. Ravensfire (talk) 04:46, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

@Ravensfire: I reverted one of your changes because it added a link to the old RFD. -- Auntof6 (talk) 08:57, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Weird edits

Can you take a look at the edits on Vishnu and Shiva? Some ips are adding weird information into it. — Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 10:09, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Any comments? Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 09:31, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) cactus, can you clarify what you mean by weird? Griff (talk) 11:32, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

@Griffinofwales I meant people adding stuff like that's not necessary but not vandalism either. I reverted some of them. You can page history Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 22:41, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

@Cactusisme: Yes, could you be more specific? Thanks. -- Auntof6 (talk) 12:07, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you!!!

Thank you so so much for your work with the Ndashes, I appreciate it a lot!! As soon as I am on PC I'll put all of the days in my watchlist (in case someone adds them an hyphen in the future). Thanks again! ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 12:13, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

@Dream Indigo: You're welcome. I'll get to them all with time. And then there might be others to do, like pages for years. We'll see.

As for adding all the days to your watchlist, are you familiar with editing the raw watchlist? That's how I added the days to my watchlist. If you want, I can give you a list of all the days to use for that, because I have them in an AWB profile.

And by the way, you don't need to use the thank function to thank me for all the edits! -- Auntof6 (talk) 13:16, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Yes, please, the list would be very useful, thank you! And sorry for all of the notifications, I'll click it fewer times next time. Apologies for that! :) ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 13:31, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

@Dream Indigo: I put the list at User:Auntof6/sandbox. Let me know when you've copied it so I don't wipe out that page before you're done with it. -- Auntof6 (talk) 13:36, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Done! Thank you so much. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 13:39, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

New page

I created this page: Murder of Will Sherod Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 03:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

@Cactusisme: I assume you want some comments on it? Here they are:

• Needs attribution
• Doesn't show notability
• The article is about the murder, not the person, so it doesn't need the death year category. It should, however, have some category for the year
• Would be good to specify that he was lynched (we have an article on that, so the word could be linked, and we have a category for it that could be added)

Hope that helps. -- Auntof6 (talk) 05:17, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

alright Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 05:30, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 07:28, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Moved the page as lynching was more appropriate Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 07:28, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

@Auntof6 Also created 2010 Nagorno-Karabakh clashes. Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 08:51, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

@Cactusisme: I just cleaned up the one about the lynching. Let me know if you have questions about anything I did.

I don't have time right now to look at the other one. -- Auntof6 (talk) 12:37, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

I will check the edits soon. Thanks Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 22:30, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Also another one Karl Asplund Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 10:06, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

@Cactusisme: I'm sorry, but I don't have time to look at any more right now. -- Auntof6 (talk) 10:08, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Alright, when you have time you can take a look. Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 10:09, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Quick deletion of Category:Video game-related lists

The page you wrote, Category:Video game-related lists, has been selected for quick deletion. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. You can find more information about the reason here. –Davey2010^Talk 21:03, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Quick deletion of Category:Paintings by Francesco Filippini

The page you wrote, Category:Paintings by Francesco Filippini, has been selected for quick deletion. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. You can find more information about the reason here. –Davey2010^Talk 21:06, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Announcement of working on expanding articles

hello again i have a question:since i expanded the Hyundai i20 and the Hyundai Getz articles do you think i am doing a great job on expanding the articles? anyways good luck with your contribuitions best regards! Automobile enthusiast (talk) 01:35, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Flowing Wells Unified School District

Hi, can you please explain the deletion of Flowing Wells Unified School District? The article about a middle school was deleted, not the article about the district. Tuscan Ant (talk) 20:27, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

@Tuscan Ant: I'm sorry, you're right. I have restored the page. -- Auntof6 (talk) 20:30, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for being a medical contributors!

The 2024 Cure Award

In 2024 you were one of the top medical editors in your language. Thank you from Wiki Project Med for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a thematic organization whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining for 2025, there are no associated costs. Additionally one of our primary efforts revolves around translating health content. We invite you to try our new workflow if you have not already. Our dashboard automatically collects statistics of your efforts and we are working on tools to automatically improve formating.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 06:22, 26 January 2025 (UTC)