BZPN

BZPN is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia at the beginning of May.

Why did you revert my vote?

I'm just curious did I do something wrong? @BZPN:. BigKrow (talk) 22:35, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

@BigKrow: because this RfA has not started yet - the candidate has not accepted the nomination. BZPN (talk) 22:51, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Oops, ok makes sense to me now, thank you. @BZPN: BigKrow (talk) 22:52, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi BZPN, for the future, rollback must not be used to remove good-faith changes by other users. As stated in the rollback guideline, the undo option should be used instead. This allows for the use of an edit summary, which can then explain your action so you don't have a confused editor asking on your talk page:) In general, it is also a good practice to not revert other members of the community, but instead use undo or talk to them on their talk page and explain why they should undo their change.

Thank you for all your hard work on anti-vandalism patrol and have a good night! Griff (talk) 23:13, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

@Griffinofwales, thank you, I'll keep this in my mind :). I used rollback only because it was the fastest way to return to the state before this change, and I hoped that the user would realize that RfA had not started yet. But you're right, I shouldn't do that. Thank you for your advice! Good night to you too! Best regards, BZPN (talk) 23:39, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Nominations

Hi, BZPN. I saw that BRPever stated that the nomination was a surprise. Just for future reference, it's best to get the nominee's agreement before making the nomination. If BZPN meant that you asked before making the nomination and that that was the surprise, then that's fine! -- Auntof6 (talk) 05:00, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Yeah, I only found out about it once the page was up which surprised me a bit. I was just thinking we might need another crat since Ferien is going on a break and he was one of the most active ones around. BRP ^ever 18:55, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

No worries though, I don't have anything major going on this week. Thanks for nominating me. BRP ^ever 18:57, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/TDKR Chicago 101 5

Per WP:CFA, "If the candidate is nominated by another editor, the one week period is calculated from when the nominated person accepts the nomination." Can you please change the closing date at this RfA? 2601:644:907E:A70:6102:D339:5958:92DB (talk) 18:11, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Unfortunately not, dear anonymous user. This is not in my control - the bureaucrat will close the RfA based on his own judgement, and I have nothing to do with it. The date on the counter is only indicative, because bureaucrats make the decision. So, changing the date on the counter won't change anything, because the bureaucrat still has to look at the page's edit history. Best regards, BZPN (talk) 18:43, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

I don't believe that's true, but I will ask an admin. 2601:644:907E:A70:6102:D339:5958:92DB (talk) 18:48, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

I actually asked this question and it's a crat job, I believe. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:22, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks

thanks in regard to Roland. 2001:2020:347:EF43:642A:F90A:72D6:E5BF (talk) 21:52, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Np :). Best regards, BZPN (talk) 22:47, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Announcement that i created a account

hello i am the same anonymous editor that contribuited and also i created a account in January 5 and created many articles (mainly about cars) and decent edits and also i hope you understand that good luck with your contribuitions best regards! Automobile enthusiast (talk) 20:24, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

@Automobile enthusiast: I'm glad you created an account! I saw some of your articles on RC recently. When I have time, I will try to look through them. Happy editing and best regards, BZPN (talk) 07:27, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Also i got welcome messages in arabic wiki in January 12 and from the ukrainian wiki today i replied the two messages using the translator that i am more involved on simple english Wikipedia but i thanked they for the message and i blanked my talk page on the ukrainian wiki because i am scared of a vandalism the same here on simple english Wikipedia in the arabic wiki on january 13 i was checking the Genesis GV80 article and in the ukrainian wiki today i was checking the Emgrand EC8 article anyways good luck with your contribuitions best regards! Automobile enthusiast (talk) 22:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Category:Italy men's international footballers

Hi BZPN, Just a heads up Category:Italy men's international footballers is showing as uncategorised on WPCleaner, I did paste the cats from Enwiki but those don't exist, Could you kindly add cats :), Many thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 21:24, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

@Davey2010 I only found one matching and reasonably accurate category (Category:Footballers). If I find anything else, I will add it. Thank you for letting me know! Best regards, BZPN (talk) 21:39, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Brilliant thanks so much, You're welcome, Happy editing, Many thanks, Warm Regards –Davey2010^Talk 21:47, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Opnion on extremely short articles

hello again i am here to tell my opnion on simple english wiki extremely short articles (mainly about cars) the objective of this wiki is to have acessible and simple language to people that have a basic level of english and to use short words.

but in my opnion some editors take the simple word a little bit too far (even though one of the rules is to not simplifiy too much a article many dont respect the rule) because they simplify the articles mainly about cars so much that they leave a extremely short article with no infobox and sources.

The Hyundai i20 article is a example because it is extremely short with useless information to the reader my articles are short but they atleast have infoboxes sources and etc anyways good luck with your contribuitions best regards! Automobile enthusiast (talk) 15:48, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

@Automobile enthusiast: thank you for your message and sharing your opinion. The length of an article does not always have to do with its simplicity. Sometimes users create stubs as an incentive for others to continue the topic. Personally, however, I am against creating almost empty stubs with one sentence and leaving them, because it is not helpful and only gives work to others. If you want, you can focus on expanding stubs :). You can also bring up a discussion on this topic on ST and share your opinion with others. Best regards, BZPN (talk) 20:47, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

also one more thing i expanded the Hyundai i20 article but i am a bit scared of someone reverting it anyways good luck with your contribuitions best regards! Automobile enthusiast (talk) 23:31, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for being a medical contributors!

The 2024 Cure Award

In 2024 you were one of the top medical editors in your language. Thank you from Wiki Project Med for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a thematic organization whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining for 2025, there are no associated costs. Additionally one of our primary efforts revolves around translating health content. We invite you to try our new workflow if you have not already. Our dashboard automatically collects statistics of your efforts and we are working on tools to automatically improve formating.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 06:22, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Announcement

Hello again if you dont know i am the user automobile enthusiast but after i made the Ford Bronco Sport article i suddenly lost the access of my account and i became an ip editor once again i am a bit disappointed for that i dont remember the password its sad that i made so many articles and good things only to me lost my account and became a ip editor once again ( i think i will take a small break of making articles due to that) i hope you understand that anyways good luck with your contribuitions best regards 179.109.143.107 (talk) 21:15, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello. I understand this is a difficult situation. If you want to recover your account and you had an email address assigned to it, you can try resetting it via Special:PasswordReset. Thank you for your contributions to the project. Best regards, BZPN (talk) 23:02, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Another announcement

hello again i literaly tried i put my real email in my automobile enthusiast account but it was literaly refused i tried 3 times it just dont accepted (because when i was making the account i didint add the email) i am a bit sad i literaly lost the acsess of my account Forever... i did so many articles and good things with that account i dont know if i edit as a ip editor or i make another account but i am scared of being accused of sockpuppeting anyways good luck with your contribuitions best regards. 179.109.143.107 (talk) 16:38, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

I see. You won't be charged with anything if you use the second account according to the rules. You can own and edit from multiple accounts legally; sockpuppetry has a negative meaning and constitutes abuse. Best regards, BZPN (talk) 19:29, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia system keeps stopping me from making article

Hello i made the VinFast article and i am making car articles for VinFast but when i always try to make the VinFast Lux SA2.0 article Wikipedia system keeps stopping me from making the article saying that my article is vandalism and is harmful when its not i did nothing wrong just making car articles for VinFast but Wikipedia's system keeps saying that its harmful.

I am a bit disapointed since sometimes Wikipedia system thinks that a article made by a ip editor (even a good faith one like me) is vandalism even though its not it looks like its stopping me from making articles again but i will keep making good Wikipedia edits and articles and i am not a vandal anyways good luck with your contribuitions best regards. 179.109.143.137 (talk) 20:53, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your message. Abuse filter appears to be blocking this action because the content of the page you want to create contains links to blocked shopping websites (tag: online shopping spam; Special:AbuseLog/179.109.143.137). Could you double check whether your content contains such links? They should be removed, then there will be no problem. You can also check if any of your links are in this list and then remove them. I hope this helps. Best regards, BZPN (talk) 21:08, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

why u revert me 2 mins ago

sad Reatom2 (talk) 15:46, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello. I did it because your message was off topic and seemed to sound incomprehensible. Best regards, BZPN (talk) 17:24, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

how off topic it a question about wkipedia Reatom2 (talk) 18:14, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

About DimlightBot

Hi so sorry to bother you but I have a concern regarding User:DimlightBot I do think that it is not a bot at all, I think we are being trolled... There is no such thing as DimlightBot, and was never created in a script (if it was a bot). 𝓐𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓲𝓭𝓮 ^{(𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓴 ♡ 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓼)} 17:30, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) - Reported at VIP as it's a troll, Thanks. –Davey2010^Talk 17:32, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

@Davey2010 Okay thank you, I knew that it was clear that we are being trolled. 𝓐𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓲𝓭𝓮 ^{(𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓴 ♡ 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓼)} 17:33, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

No worries :), Just a heads up they've also been using an IP pretending to be the bot too (this is listed at VIP too), I could be wrong but I suspect this is AmogusBOT, Have a great day Adelaide and BZPN, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 17:37, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

"Your" following stub, approved

I have reviewed "your" 'AI generated text'.

1. If you use edit remark "This text was AI-generated. No source has been reviewed yet by a TWO wikipedia-users. Two lines/sentences have now been reviewed and approved by at least one 'extra wikipedia-user'. From, simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:BZPN/AI_article&oldid=10083077"

2. And if, you do not add any source/link (in that article), if you have not 'readd the link';

then go ahead and start the stub, with only the following text:

"Tatrzański National Park (Polish: *Tatrzański Park Narodowy*) is a national park located in the Tatra Mountains in southern Poland. The park covers an area of 211.64 square kilometers and was established in 1954."

Note: the infobox is approved, if you lose the word "scenic". 2001:2020:325:D0A7:D563:BAFC:438C:2950 (talk) 17:41, 17 February 2025 (UTC) 2001:2020:325:D0A7:D563:BAFC:438C:2950 (talk) 17:41, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello. I'm generally not interested in how this AI works and I'm not going to improve it, I just presented it as a curiosity. I don't really intend for anyone to use it regularly, and I don't really understand what you're trying to tell me :). And the article itself was not and will not be intended for publication - it is only used for testing. Best regards, BZPN (talk) 19:08, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

A announcement

Hello look i am not stopping making articles but i wil take a small break from making articles because:a ip editor is being authoritarian with me just because some parts of my articles are copied from en wiki and yes i know that and i know my articles are not perfect but he even asked for a 12 hour block of me on Wikipedia admnistrators noticeboard just because of this even though i did nothing wrong.

Also he said my articles are not ready to stay published and etc and due to this i will take a small break from making articles remebering i am not doing personal attack aganist him just saying of educated form that i am taking a small break from making articles due to this that happened anyways good luck with your contribuitions best regards. 179.109.143.218 (talk) 20:54, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Hidden category

Hi, hope you're having a nice day 😊 I was wondering, was Category:Articles with AI-generated content meant to be a hidden category? ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 16:53, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, @Asteralee. Thank you for your message. Yes, it was meant to be a hidden category. I've fixed that now. Thanks again, and have a nice day :). BZPN (talk) 17:24, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

PGA closure

Hi, while closing it can we just write the conclusion at the bottom and mark the section as resolved for bot to archive. Also, the bot only archives the resolved section in a week so there should be no problem with removing recently closed section. Our requests aren't very frequent and I think the archival can keep up even if we do that. BRP ^ever 15:49, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

I have changed the one you recently closed. Lemme know if you have a different opinion or think it should be done differently. Thanks, BRP ^ever 15:52, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi, @BRPever. It's fine, thanks for the message :). I just haven't been here in a while, and I didn't know about it. I'll keep this in my mind. Thank you and best regards, BZPN (talk) 16:07, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

That's alright, this is the first request this year anyway haha. BRP ^ever 16:10, 26 March 2025 (UTC)